20200929: Debate, Cleveland, Ohio, POTUS vs. Hiden’ Biden

And with this tweet, it looks like the event is on:

No lid on Biden appearances today, apparently.

That doesn’t mean there hasn’t been plenty of chatter, even from our favorite letter of the alphabet.

4787

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 51569f No.10835804📁
Sep 29 2020 11:38:09 (EST)NEW

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-third-party-inspect-ears-electronic-devices
#3
Q

After that drop appeared, this happened.

You’d expect such a request from a very pregnant woman, but a man bidding to be the most powerful person on the planet?

This is going to be the definition of a [guano] show if there ever was such a thing.

Oh, found this @Jack’s place. For those who play:

Before this is over we’ll all be either lying on the floor due to a drinking game, or just like Joey, the rescued sea otter in Vancouver.

Are we ready?

Live links to be added.

I don’t see a link for OANN.

696 thoughts on “20200929: Debate, Cleveland, Ohio, POTUS vs. Hiden’ Biden

  1. A long time ago, there used to be this late night informercial on TV with a con man claiming to be a “televangelist.” I put that term in quotes because the real point of the informercial was to beg viewers to send him money. And by “beg,” I mean he’d stare into the TV and repeat the same NLP phrases over and over as an attempt to hypnotize his late night viewers who were probably already in an altered mental state from being sleepy, drunk, or high.

    That’s exactly who Biden reminded me of tonight. Even the bizarre choice of wearing a high-contrast, colorless outfit reads (to me, anyways) as an attempt at hypnotizing the viewer. The jail stripe tie is the same type of repeating, black-and-white pattern used in hypnosis. (It also fits right in with the rest of the Left’s use of parallel lines in their messaging). They even made the man’s eyes darker to emphasize the contrast. The colorless outfit, staring into the camera and repeating the same lies over and over…I strongly suspect Joe’s handlers really were attempting psychological tricks here.

    Compare the eye color:

    Liked by 10 people

    1. Were any of you all getting the strong ZAPPING of the television? At several junctures our TV just went nuts – almost blacked out – zapping sound like an electrical short – missed a word or two in some cases – but it also gave me a kind of neural shock, too. Oddly, after one, I had negative thoughts about Trump – that he reminded me of somebody else – a completely different person with black hair, younger. VERY strange. I was wondering if it was a subliminal dropped in, not at the source, but somewhere out in the NETWORK.

      Liked by 3 people

      1. I watched the Fox News livestream on Youtube without issue. I first tried watching it on POTUS’s official Youtube channel, but their livestream was too blurry. I’m assuming Youtube HQ was intentionally degrading the video quality.

        Liked by 2 people

      1. The dark eyes were the second thing I noticed right after the jail stripe tie. I don’t ever remember them being that dark. I don’t think it was a lighting issue, either, because I didn’t notice any difference in POTUS’s eyes or appearance.

        Liked by 2 people

        1. OMG – that’s why he was looking down. They’re polarized contacts. They work like polarized sunglasses. That way he can read polarized projected text invisible to the naked eye. I haven’t worked out the details, but I’m sure a system based on polarized light is possible.

          Liked by 4 people

          1. Hmm, could a high-contrast jail stripe tie somehow aid this process? If he’s looking down, then he’d see the hypnotic pattern of the tie, too, right? Maybe the tie was meant to direct his vision to whatever he was looking down at? Or the hypnotic pattern was meant to trigger something mentally while looking down?

            Liked by 2 people

            1. Great thinking. There may be a way to illuminate the tie with polarized light and see “invisible writing” on it. I do think the tie was used for standard hypnotic effects, but AND LOGIC says maybe other things, too.

              The nice part about writing on the tie is that there’s no evidence left behind.

              Liked by 2 people

          2. That’s the answer! Spherical curved LCD displays in contact lenses were being developed back in 2012. He was READING the answers!

            Belgian researchers are developing a spherical curved LCD display that can fit onto contact lenses. While other attempts have fallen short in the past, this technology could cover an entire lens worth of text, images and other visuals.

            https://mashable.com/2012/12/08/contact-lenses-text-messages/

            Liked by 2 people

  2. RECAP: Beijing Joe Biden’s an EMPTY SUIT.
    • ChYna Joe cannot make tough DECISIONS.
    • ChYna Joe cannot cite personal ACCOMPLISHMENTS.
    • ChYna Joe cannot come up with constructive PLANS.

    But women voters will LOVE his PC TONE and STYLE.
    • “Shut Up”
    • “You’re a Clown”
    • “Stupid Bastards”

    Liked by 12 people

    1. She said the more violence and chaos reign, “the better it is for the very clear choice on who’s best on public safety.”
      He said that she said the more chaos, “the better for us.”
      So he is equating “us” and “the clear choice for public safety.” 🤨

      Liked by 5 people

    1. I heard Joe say that Trump’s own leader of the FBI (or something) has said that Antifa was an idea not an organization. I thought I’d heard that Wray made some such ridiculous statement recently, which is one of many reasons so many of would like to see Wray out & someone like Sydney Powell in to clean up the FIB!

      Liked by 2 people

      1. It could have been Wray – dunno – did not hear his full testimony – however – Biden has no original thoughts of his own – so he grabs onto what others say – and calls it his own – or maybe, his handler does that.

        Liked by 1 person

  3. Liked by 11 people

  4. HOW BIDEN CHEATS

    Big picture for me is that Trump proved he’s fast on his feet and can actually react to things, AND how Biden is cheating.

    Trump was obviously WAY faster on his feet. Biden could only look good with CANNED SPEECH. On his feet, Biden is confused. A few insults was all he had. He kept going back to “he has no plan” – clearly BS – but only for a while. Note that Biden could not hold that theme for even a full hour – more like half an hour.

    Trump’s method of attacking Joe Biden by numerous interruptions was a brilliant way to demo how the cheats work.

    Trump’s method of sparring with Chris Wallace was how he demonstrated that the questions were unfair and designed to hurt Trump and help Biden.

    Trump UPENDED a rigged debate, so that it looked nothing like it was SUPPOSED TO LOOK.

    Here is how the cheats work. This is how they ALL have worked from the beginning.

    Biden relies on VERBAL COACHING to keep on track. Biden has somebody one one or both ears who can remind him of the missing word – who can begin a short pitch to “kick-start” him into a long-term memorized spiel. It ALMOST looks natural, but not quite. They “talk him along. We’ll get to that in a moment.

    Biden has been caught THREE TIMES with earpieces – first the clear thin one over the ear, then the “bugs” that fell off his back standing outside next to the field, then the “flat” flesh-tone jobs. He was probably using the latter this time. Somebody on Q Tree saw something briefly, but you don’t need to see the device itself to tell Biden is relying on verbal cues.

    If Trump leaves Biden alone, then the combination of (1) getting the questions ahead of time, plus (2) his practiced spiels, and most of all (3) the coaching when he hits a rough spot, allows Biden to FAKE a much higher degree of competence than he really has.

    When Trump interrupts, it creates FOUR PEOPLE TALKING – Biden, Wallace, Trump, AND whoever is on the earpiece. This confuses the heck out of Biden, so he just STOPS and waits.

    Trump’s interruptions frequently change things enough that the coaches have to listen as well and re-advise, so Biden has to just sit there and delay his response until he gets fresh coaching. You can see Biden trying to listen – he closes his eyes. and concentrates on the coaching and remembering the correct advised spiel.

    When Trump did NOT interrupt Biden, you can STILL see him react to the coaching, but it’s different. He appears to correct himself without “sentiently” understanding what he’s doing. Biden gets very mildly confused by correcting according to instructions and then trying to resume. You can see the look on his face – he’s “looking in” to the corrections in his earpiece – he’s visualizing the voice of the coaching words.

    When Biden is NOT corrected by the earpiece coach, he loses track – he loses his train of thought. Those are the times he goes into wandering thoughts and sentences that jump track. When he’s getting the coaching, Biden can almost – ALMOST – make it through a canned mini-spiel without derailing.

    Trump really threw off Biden’s canned emotion-grabber mini-speeches. Trump showed us a couple of times that he can do canned spiels, too, but more importantly he only once or twice allowed Biden to gain any phony momentum using these illegitimately pre-rehearsed, illegitimately coached answers to illegitimately leaked questions.

    Basically, Trump SABOTAGED THE CHEATS – not using an electronic jammer on the earpieces – but by forcing Biden out of his phony lane of fake competence with interruptions.

    Liked by 25 people

    1. Yup…there was a lot more going on in that debate than we’ll ever know. Most people will just see the surface stuff…but there was some serious mind tricks going on tonight…a lot will come away saying that the whole thing was silly and meaningless or annoying…but, as the Dilbert creator would say…we are watching a master persuader.

      Biden came away looking extremely weak. Two more debates will bury him.

      Liked by 13 people

    2. Excellent analysis – no wonder this debate was so confusing to watch – there was another person in the room we could not hear – but, Biden heard – and even though he was coached – he kept messing up.

      There were so many times when one scratched his/her head – about what is he talking – does he even know? He has no idea how to create jobs – by putting people out of work – increasing taxes – and waiting for new jobs to be created – what are they to do in the interim?

      The Green New Deal was one area where he slipped up massively – touting its points – and then denying he was for it – what does deforesting in the Amazon have to do with fires in CA?

      Liked by 6 people

      1. Chrissy tried to *CORNER* Trump on the “climate change” fake science question – POTUS did a great dodge that people understand, rather than the horrible truth that most of science is under a ChiCom social delusion.

        Liked by 5 people

        1. Yes, he did – the minute Wallace mentioned ‘climate change’ – I knew there was going to be a fight – Biden picked up defunding the Paris Accord – he would re-instate it – Wallace gave himself away when he began criticizing PT for his actions – with which he did not agree – he was showing his leftist tendencies – neither Biden nor Wallace mentioned the cost – but, PT chimed in with the biggest polluters who would pay little or nothing.

          Liked by 6 people

              1. LOL – no we understand that – but, most people do not – cannot believe the ignorance – who in his/her right mind would want their taxes increased? They start with the rich until they get down to the poor – such liars!!!

                Question: How many jobs do you have to cut to create new jobs for the Green New Deal? What industries would be deleted?

                Liked by 5 people

    3. Sadie Slays pointed out a few things Biden’s little memorized spiels:

      “A long time ago, there used to be this late night informercial on TV with a con man claiming to be a “televangelist.” I put that term in quotes because the real point of the informercial was to beg viewers to send him money. And by “beg,” I mean he’d stare into the TV and repeat the same NLP phrases over and over as an attempt to hypnotize his late night viewers who were probably already in an altered mental state from being sleepy, drunk, or high.

      That’s exactly who Biden reminded me of tonight. Even the bizarre choice of wearing a high-contrast, colorless outfit reads (to me, anyways) as an attempt at hypnotizing the viewer. The jail stripe tie is the same type of repeating, black-and-white pattern used in hypnosis. (It also fits right in with the rest of the Left’s use of parallel lines in their messaging). They even made the man’s eyes darker to emphasize the contrast. The colorless outfit, staring into the camera and repeating the same lies over and over…I strongly suspect Joe’s handlers really were attempting psychological tricks here.”

      https://wqth.wordpress.com/2020/09/29/20200929-debate-cleveland-ohio-potus-vs-hiden-biden/comment-page-6/#comment-612411

      I think she is absolutely correct about the Neuro-Linguistic Programming – NLP.

      Øbama used NLP too. It’s an empirically proven psychological indoctrination technique.

      It’s how the leftists psyops propagandists got people to believe in the invented hypothetical constructs – ‘orientations’ ‘sexual identity’ and ‘gender theory’ – used to sell LBGTQXYZ agenda step-by-step goals to the public.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Trump War Room – Text TRUMP to 88022 (@TrumpWarRoom) Tweeted:
    Chris Wallace only interrupted Joe Biden 15 times.

    Wallace interrupted President Trump 76 times! #Debates2020

    Liked by 7 people

  6. EconChick/IntelChick (@MikayesFiona) Tweeted:
    I do blame it on Chris Wallace.

    I’m still breathing fire.

    He never pushed back on all of Biden’s lies. Trump had to do it but Chris would shut him down. Then Chris would start a question with lies himself. Livid.

    Liked by 10 people

    1. My wife was angry, too, but she wasn’t really sure where to direct the anger. She didn’t like that the debate was so unruly, and initially thought Trump was “doing it wrong and losing votes”, but when I explained how Trump was breaking up Biden’s cheating earpiece speeches by interrupting them, the focus of her anger shifted to Biden and the fact that the cheating is allowed.

      Liked by 7 people

      1. “She didn’t like that the debate was so unruly, ”

        ___________

        I LOVED it!

        If anything, I thought Trump was holding back more than he should have.

        It was enough to thrash both of his opponents, but he never even took the gloves off.

        Liked by 4 people

    2. “Jake Tapper says his friend’s 6th grade daughter “burst into tears, had to run to bed” because she was “so appalled” by Trump during debate.”

      ____________

      Oh yeah?

      Well my uncle’s cousin’s nephew’s neighbor’s dog thought Trump was fantastic, and so did I 😁👍

      Jake Tapper… 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

      Liked by 8 people

    1. That’s a HUGE margin of victory.

      Not as huge as DJT’s margin of victory should be on election day, but still ridiculously lopsided.

      And yet I still think they fudged the numbers, it was likely closer to 90% to 10% in favor of Trump, and they doctored the numbers in an attempt to avoid total humiliation.

      Which didn’t work… 😂

      Liked by 5 people

  7. Laura Ingraham isn’t going to comment on Chrissy Wallace’s awful performance either..even though her guests have brought it up…cowards! The Left would absolutely destroy a moderator that dared question one of their communist darlings…

    Liked by 6 people

      1. Then do the opposite.

        Do a whole segment on how fantastic Wallace was, make it so over-the-top that everybody knows you’re being sarcastic, but nobody can claim you criticized his pathetic performance 😂😁👍

        Liked by 2 people

          1. I wouldn’t even try to get people to believe me, I’d be saying all of it with a big *&^%-eating grin on my face, enjoying every minute of it, knowing my audience knew full well that I was being completely sarcastic 😁

            Liked by 2 people

      2. “They cannot criticize Wallace – unwritten law in TV journalism – they would lose their jobs – imho – so even if they think he conducted himself miserable – they cannot say anything.”

        This was my first impression, too…but Gutfeld and Watters criticize dopey Juan Williams all the time…and Geraldo Rivera and Dan Bongino are allowed to go after each other all the time…many other examples…so this argument doesn’t hold weight…many other examples, too. If the next argument is that Chris Wallace is a “news” person as opposed to an “opinion” person, I’m gonna lose my lunch. It’s all theater fakery.

        Liked by 6 people

        1. These two are heavy hitters, Harry – the other ones – we are used to hearing the spats among them – Bongino has never held back – he can be brutal at times – Wallace has longevity – and prominence – a seasoned water carrier – as does Hannity and Ingraham – so with some – it is ok – others – not so much – imho

          Wallace is worthless – we both know that – and I am sure PT doesn’t like him, either – he was too kind and patient with Biden – and nasty to PT.

          Like

  8. The best part of the debate may have been not having to see Wallace’s weasel face the whole time 😂

    Or maybe that depends on which live feed you watched. I watched the RSBN livestream, so the whole time the camera was stationary directly behind Wallace’s head 👍

    Liked by 5 people

  9. I didn’t watch the debate (way past my bedtime).

    However, the French radio talk show I listen to this morning discussed it. One of the panellists watched it. He said that it wasn’t that great. Biden wasn’t as bad as he had anticipated but wasn’t very good, either. He did not think Biden had a plan for his presidency.

    He said that the US is in real trouble if all an incumbent and a past vice president can do is exchange barbs on national television.

    He was shocked that most of his American friends in France, whom he described as ‘Californian and zen’, are planning to vote for PDJT this year.

    Another panellist, who didn’t watch it, said he has never known the US media to treat another American president as shabbily as they have PDJT: totally biased.

    One of the show’s hosts added that the French media haven’t treated PDJT any better. (Also true.)

    Here in the UK, we have two Trump twitter trends: #VoteHimOut and a news thread about his ‘refusal’ to condemn racism. Total rubbish, but did we expect anything else?

    In closing, I just checked the Daily Telegraph headlines. One columnist thought Biden won. Another said that Trump won.

    Liked by 3 people

  10. wonderful thread…thanks DePat for posting it and the rest of the commenters for making it fun!
    I love to read all your impressions–and you guys can make me LAUGH!!!!

    and thanks wolf, sadie and anyone i missed, for the explanations on Biteme…I would never in a million years believe Biteme could string together a coherent reply without some sort of cheating.

    Liked by 4 people

    1. Comments on GAB:

      Ifwewalktogether
      @Ifwewalktogether
      ·

      1 like
      ·
      26m

      @a I could not upvote this enough

      Unlike

      Reply

      ···
      Wolf Moon
      Wolf Moon
      @WOLFM00N
      ·
      1m

      @Ifwewalktogether @a I’m spreading it everywhere – it’s genius. This would FLIP millions of Biden votes, and is EXACTLY why the left is pushing their assets inside Spotify to try to influence Rogan. It’s all clear as day now. They know that this kind of media move insures a Trump victory.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s