20191220: Bill Barr Interview w/McCallum ~ Part 1

Here’s the video: He’s cagey. Doesn’t appear to like Comey. No determination yet.

60 thoughts on “20191220: Bill Barr Interview w/McCallum ~ Part 1

      1. Sylvia Avery,
        you are being nice. I want to use my trusty pitchfork on him…. The one I killed a rabid rat with. But instead I will let John Durham deal with him.

        Liked by 3 people

    1. Wolfie,

      I think you might find this article very very interesting. It is about the IG Report.

      The Hidden Hand
      by Charles “Sam” Faddis December 11, 2019

      The essence of a coup, which some might refer to as covert action, is the hidden hand. One does not announce that a foreign power is overthrowing the government and installing a new government. One pulls strings as if from behind a curtain, making events that are all part of a carefully orchestrated plan appear disconnected, spontaneous and serendipitous.

      As I read through the recently released IG report for the second time, as someone with a great deal of experience in military and intelligence matters, I see that hand everywhere….

      Who is Sam Faddis?

      Sam Faddis is a retired CIA operations officer, published author, and national security commentator. In addition to writing, speaking and teaching, he consults for the U.S. military, U.S. government and private industry….

      Sam led the first CIA team into Iraq nine months in advance of the 2003 invasion of that country. After serving abroad in the Middle East, South Asia and Europe, he served as head of the CIA’s Counter Terrorism Center (CTC)’s Weapons of Mass Destruction unit charged with pursuing terrorist weapons of mass destruction programs worldwide. He has run large organizations, worked across the U.S. Intelligence Community and the Department of Defense and been involved in national security matters at the highest levels of our government. He has also spent more than his share of time running sources and covert action campaigns in the field….

      Prior to joining CIA, Sam was a U.S. Army Armor and JAG officer (Captain), and then served as an Assistant Attorney General for the State of Washington.

      Sam is the author of “Beyond Repair: The Decline And Fall Of The CIA” and “Willful Neglect: The Dangerous Illusion Of Homeland Security.”
      http://samfaddis.org/about/

      Liked by 3 people

      1. Oh, this one is GOLD. Everybody has to read this. It explains SO MUCH – including how the RANK AND FILE helped bust things OVER and OVER and OVER, but also how SpyGate COULD NOT be anything but a HEADED CONSPIRACY – very likely under a FOREIGN POWER.

        Liked by 1 person

    1. The left keeps Martha in place because she does a great job for them, and nobody ever realizes it.

      Picture Martha with neon orange hair, giant hoop earrings, and a HILLARY tattoo. I trust her as far as I can throw her BONG WATER. 😉

      Liked by 13 people

      1. “The left keeps Martha in place because she does a great job for them, and nobody ever realizes it.”

        _______________

        I didn’t use to realize it, I used to like her.

        She used to seem attractive.

        Now she seems ugly. It’s not her appearance that has changed (much), it’s the knowledge of the evil inside her that made the perception change.

        My anger at what I know she’s doing, what I know she knows and pretends not to know, and how she plays it all off like the non-biased bubble-headed bleach-blonde turned serious, as she presents herself… I can barely stand to listen to her now, much less look at her.

        She is as corrupt as any of them, and better at hiding it than most, because of the mask she wears.

        But that mask is aging, just as she is.

        And it’s not aging well.

        Liked by 10 people

        1. I know exactly what you’re saying. She’s DESIGNED for that. Once you see it, it’s a bit horrifying, TBH. I used to think she was hot stuff, but there was always something that bothered me and I could not put my finger on it. Now – I kinda get a cringe when I see her, because it’s just a very soft form of office flirty-porn mixed with mind control.

          NOT WATCHING Fox News for a few years really woke me up. It’s a kind of hypnosis where the slight of hand is in the eye tracking.

          WATCH THE LEGS, WATCH THE LEGS, WATCH THE FACE, WATCH THE HAIR, WATCH THE EYES, WATCH THE LEGS

          And ALL THE TIME, this stuff is going into the male brain that is not particularly ominous, but it creates the FAKE NORMAL of what a conservative is allowed to believe, question, worry about, doubt, or believe without question.

          Martha is THE BEST at making JUDGMENTAL INFLUENCE FACES in response to stated things, after she pumps for those statements with questions. It’s a total scam. And we of the REPTILE BRAIN just follow along like lizards in a cage, bobbing our heads in unison, hoping that she’ll NOT SNIFF TOO HARD at the answer we like, or that she’ll make an interested Hmmm! sound with it, because SHE’S HOT.

          Such a scam.

          It’s ALL Fake News.

          Liked by 9 people

          1. ‘NOT WATCHING Fox News for a few years really woke me up. It’s a kind of hypnosis where the slight of hand is in the eye tracking.’

            ______________

            Yes, not watching for a month or more, and then seeing it again, is what I imagine it would be like going through detoxification, and then being exposed to the stimulant/depressant/hallucinogenic again.

            You don’t notice what it is doing to you when your system is accustomed to it and your tolerance is acclimated to it.

            But get away from it for long enough to ‘reset’ your own internal system, and then see it again, it’s like poison.

            My Mom has Fox News on 24/7, so I see it when I go to see her, and I can’t take it. It’s like a psychological assault. I can’t ‘tune it out’, so I end up arguing every point they’re making, explaining to my Mom what’s actually going on, and how these liars on Fox News are just as bad as all the other Fake News, they’re just appealing to a different demographic.

            The Fox propaganda / narrative / controlled opposition routine is especially “in your face” if you are getting your news (real news) from alternate sources, so you KNOW what’s really going on, so you see clearly just how warped and distorted — purposefully, because no one is in a better position to know what is actually going on than they are — the Fox News ‘narrative’ really is.

            I can’t watch it without constantly thinking of Hanoi Hannah or Tokyo Rose. The only difference is that Fox News is more subtle about it, so it’s harder to notice, unless you’ve been away from it for a while.

            Liked by 2 people

            1. I don’t watch any of the fake news not even fox,watch local news at 6 am for the weather report and to get a look at local tweakers on the loose then switch over to the western channel.i do watch clips that are posted though. The way I see it is why watch a bunch of liars with high hair who think we’re so stupid as to believe anything they report.besides I have enough bs to deal with on a daily basis why do I need fake news yanking my chain?

              Liked by 2 people

        2. I can’t stand her, and she has a habit/behavior that drives me nuts! She never shuts her mouth! I want to tell to close her damn mouth before the flies get in.

          I think some women think that is sexy (maybe men like it, I don’t know), but to me it just makes people look stupid. I call them slack-jawed morons.

          Liked by 4 people

          1. OMG, you’re right, she does that! Not as bad as those “mouth-breather” guys that were all the rage in hipsterville (not sure if that big smiling “O” mouth is still a thing), but yeah!

            She’s obviously not what I would call “ditzy”, but I think you’re spot on with the open mouth thing. It’s like she’s a few seconds before saying “oh my God” AT ALL TIMES. I think it’s a trained behavior that makes it look like “NEWS IS HAPPENING, FOLKS!”

            Seriously, this is all a science. It would be a snap to TRAIN news anchors to get maximum focus group numbers based on their microbehaviors, and then TRAIN THEM to show those behaviors to the max.

            “FAKE NATURAL”!!!

            Liked by 5 people

            1. “OMG, you’re right, she does that!”

              ______________

              It’s the Farrah Faucett look. That’s what it reminded me of.

              So I checked, and nearly all of Farrah’s photos from the 1970s have her mouth open, even when she’s clearly not smiling for the camera.

              There is no new thing under the sun.

              Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? it hath been already of old time, which was before us.” (Ecclesiastes 1:10, KJV)

              https://duckduckgo.com/?q=farrah+faucett&t=ffcm&iax=images&ia=images

              Liked by 1 person

          2. “She never shuts her mouth! I want to tell to close her damn mouth before the flies get in.”

            ______________

            Yes, it’s very much on purpose, most women on TV seem to do it. It’s also a learned behavior. They often forget — like forgetting to maintain proper posture — and then remember, and the mouth opens part way, for no (apparent) reason.

            .

            “I think some women think that is sexy (maybe men like it, I don’t know),”

            _____________

            It is an opportunity to display her very carefully maintained teeth, to effectively ‘smile’ without smiling, but there is also an ‘attraction’ aspect to it that you mentioned.

            It’s like a type of body language cue, similar to crossed arms vs. open arms. Crossed arms is guarded, open arms is accessible.

            Closed mouth is guarded, open mouth is ‘come hither’ 🙂

            Everything is designed for maximum manipulation, so much so, that it becomes second-nature, it’s just part of the routine, there is no need to consciously think about it after they become accustomed to the required set of behaviors.

            Liked by 1 person

    2. Oh yeah…I wanted to slap her!

      I wondered ‘why’ AG Barr did this interview with her, instead of Tucker, Hannity or Laura Ingraham.
      Ingraham seems the better choice, since she has the legal background.

      Maybe Barr decided to do the interview in more ‘neutral territory’…although Martha is hardly neutral.

      But doing the interview with her puts forth a more non-partisan image, than if he had done it with one of the Trump-supporting people.

      Liked by 11 people

      1. Yes, exactly! I would have enjoyed it more if Laura had done it. Actually, I cannot fault Martha’s interviewing skills. She actually has some journo training and skill. Too bad she uses it for evil rather than good. But she didn’t lay a glove on Barr. Heh!

        Liked by 5 people

        1. I know – I’ve given her a lot of schite here, but the truth is, if you accept the fake news job as a less-than-evil reality, she’s competent at it.

          I just no longer think of most MSM journalists as anything but low grade spies, propaganda mouthpieces, provocateurs, disinformation artistes, etc., wrapped up in eye candy as needed.

          Liked by 5 people

      2. Tucker would be great AND would be listened to.

        Hannity blatantly Trump AND may not allow AG Barr to finish sentences.

        Laura, much like Hannity. Commonly interrupting person interviewed and too much yammering on her part.

        Tucker, me thinks is the best interviewer faux news has these days. Listens. Thinks on his feet so to speak. Smart.

        Liked by 8 people

      1. “I noticed that too…she kept throwing potholes out there for Barr to fall into…”

        _______________

        That’s how you know she’s a con, a fake, a prop for the Left, because on the rare occasion she gets to interview a Leftist, suddenly there are no potholes, they magically all disappear.

        Except the notable absence of any potholes for Leftists screams at me like an air-raid siren.

        The deception infuriates me to the point that I can’t watch it. And it reminds me that the whole thing is always rigged, all the time. The Wizard is always behind the curtain, doing his thing.

        Always do everything possible to trip up the white hats, and bring out the softballs for the black hats.

        Fox News just has to do it more subtly in order to manipulate and deceive their target demographic, while the other propaganda networks can openly revel in their hostility toward white hats.

        Liked by 3 people

  1. Martha shows how worried they are about Durham…she kept trying to extract info from Barr about the investigation…especially the “what if he finds nothing” angle…will YOU accept that? (laughable since it’s been 3 yrs since the election and the left still hasn’t accepted Donald Trump as their President…)

    Liked by 7 people

  2. Suspicious cat side eye @ Martha, seems her rapid fire questions were too well prepped .
    But , B2 was ready for her.
    Even though a lot was going on the day of this interview .
    why does it appear to be delivered in pieces?

    Liked by 3 people

  3. No leaks= party is a private party and the cabal ain’t invited, we will see justice just not on our time because this is so massive alot of big names are going down…
    Patience is a must or some of these swamp dwellers could walk.
    I dont see many of them walking away from this.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s