A Higher Loyalty: Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, a.k.a. HSBC

Wherein we postulate that the real driver of James Comey and Spygate comes straight out of CHINA-PWNED BANKSTERISM – that the Clinton relationship to China may actually be “handled” via HSBC, and that the fact that the entire international cast of Spygate is nearly perfectly matched by the amoeba-like shadow of HSBC is no accident.



HSBC Holdings plc is a British[6] multinational investment bank and financial services holding company. It was the 7th largest bank in the world by 2018, and the largest in Europe, with total assets of US$2.558 trillion (as of December 2018). HSBC traces its origin to a hong in Hong Kong, and its present form was established in London by the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation to act as a new group holding company in 1991.[7][8] The origins of the bank lie mainly in Hong Kong and to a lesser extent in Shanghai, where branches were first opened in 1865.[1] The HSBC name is derived from the initials of the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation.[9] The company was first formally incorporated in 1866.[10]

HSBC has around 3,900 offices in 65 countries and territories across Africa, Asia, Oceania, Europe, North America, and South America, and around 38 million customers.[11] As of 2014, it was the world’s sixth-largest public company, according to a composite measure by Forbes magazine.[12]

HSBC is organised within four business groups: Commercial Banking, Global Banking and Markets (investment banking), Retail Banking and Wealth Management, and Global Private Banking.[13][14]

HSBC has a dual[15] primary listing on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the Hang Seng Index and the FTSE 100 Index. As of 6 July 2012, it had a market capitalisation of £102.7 billion, the second-largest company listed on the London Stock Exchange, after Royal Dutch Shell.[16] It has secondary listings on the New York Stock Exchange, Euronext Paris, and the Bermuda Stock Exchange.


I had NO IDEA that this company that hired James Comey was CHINA-RELATED until I began writing this post. The reason is that I never see Hong Kong, Shanghai, or China ever mentioned when HSBC is being talked about. ENGLAND and EUROPE are usually hinted at. Thus, to me, HSBC was always just some “European” bank. But yet – well – Hong Kong and China – possibly being almost the same thing to the ChiComs per their propaganda – are IMPORTANT at the very least in HSBC.

My revelation about Comey and his relationship to HSBC being CRITICAL in understanding Spygate stems from my recent time in Paris, mentioned earlier in my post about the cab driver there.

When I was in Paris, I saw very EXPENSIVE signs and ads for HSBC almost EVERYWHERE – so much so, that I assumed it must have been some kind of FRENCH BANK. Well, not quite. But nevertheless, the main impact of all these signs was to IMPRESS ME with the POWER of HSBC.

How could Comey even THINK of resisting that stuff?

I mean, seriously – how do you TALK BACK to this shit when you’re just a guy like me on the internet who CAN – [ barring some minor attempted outsourced GUNPLAY, “vide infra” ] – much less somebody who actually WORKED FOR IT?

HSBC – whose fortunes are largely controlled by the CHICOMS – wants to take away your GUNS? Hey – it might actually HAPPEN. And if a few Americans are killed in the process…… Well….. Not thinking these people really CARE all that much.

Suddenly, the idea that Comey had WORKED for HSBC, began to make me think that maybe they were still INFLUENCING HIM – even if only in his LATENT WORLDVIEW.

And then something CLICKED. HSBC was even MORE connected to one of my weird little GUN SET-UPS – which I have assumed were FBI-related – than even “Epstein-related corporate entities”.


Suddenly, things began making sense. What if the FBI has been TAINTED by HSBC after Comey’s time there? What if it’s not “THING 1” but rather “THING 2” that has been mucking with the FBI from the inside?

CHYYYNNAA – and maybe LONDON, too.

Perhaps not right NOW, with Director Wray in charge, because Wray has been very aggressive in taking on the China threats which Mueller and Comey tended to ignore. But IF the HSBC taint in the FBI was deep and subtle, it would explain a lot.

And then there is this:

HSBC Money-Laundering Case Haunts Mueller’s Prosecution of Manafort

Why Mueller, Comey, Loretta Lynch and Eric Holder let HSBC walk on criminal money-laundering crimes in exchange for $1.9 billion fine

LINK: https://www.newswars.com/hsbc-money-laundering-case-haunts-muellers-prosecution-of-manafort/

Now – before you think this is “all there is” (bad enough that it is), allow me to suggest that you simply so a web search on “Comey” and “HSBC”. You will be shocked at not only how much scandalous material arises – you will see that “Clinton Foundation” features in almost all of it.

Just click that link and PICK OUT one or two articles.

There is NO WAY that either James Comey or Andrew McCabe should have been allowed to TOUCH the Clinton email case. “Recusal” is not strong enough. They should not have been allowed to even TALK about it.

Bill Priestap should have had the final say on it. MAYBE – and “maybe” is probably more honest – given that Priestap’s wife is some kind of connected financial and Israeli intelligence private investigation MEGA SECURITY RISK. (Sorry – I don’t want to sort through all her employers, REAL AND COVER, right now….)

You know who should have been put in charge of the FBI investigation? Who should have “negotiated” with Loretta Lynch?

A RANDOM “rank and file” FBI agent, whose name was drawn from a HAT on live TV.

Be that as it all may, I find it very odd that an “English” (COUGH, COUGH) global bank that is rooted in CHINA and which does mega business with the CLINTON FOUNDATION and the CLINTONS was the employer of JAMES COMEY for many years. A bank which is geographically and culturally connected to nearly EVERY player in SpyGate.

So – what do you all think?

Is #SpyGate really a “derivative” of #HSBCgate?

Maybe the “banksters” are FAR CLOSER than we have thought.


104 thoughts on “A Higher Loyalty: Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, a.k.a. HSBC

  1. Do not forget the British and the Opium Wars. Hong Kong is the result.

    SEE: Lessons of history: China’s century of humiliation

    I think the current US opioid crisis is PAYBACK!

    China Picks at the Scab to Keep the Wound Fresh

    …..The current Chinese leader, Xi Jinping, is the first of the “heirs” to take power. As the son of a communist general who fought the Japanese and the Nationalists, he is a princeling, a member of the new hereditary aristocracy. A passage from an essay by the Australian defense analyst Paul Monk is very telling on the subject of what President Xi intends for Asia’s near future:

    In any case, Xi Jinping, despite his genial smile, good English, and familiarity with the United States, is no reforming liberal. Shortly after assuming the presidency, he took all the members of his politburo with him to the bizarre museum the Party has built in Tiananmen Square – the museum of national humiliation and revival. He pointed out to them the exhibits showing the arrival of the Jesuits via Macao in the sixteenth century and how this had been the beginning of the infiltration and humiliation of China by the West. He pointed out the exhibits showing the Japanese invasions of China and making the unfounded assertion that the Japanese were defeated by the Communist Party with a little help from “good” Nationalist generals. The Americans, he said, then became the enemy. “Against this external enemy,” he told China’s inner group of top leaders, “we must stick together.”

    To erase the shame of its century of national humiliation, China will need to have an unequivocal victory over somebody….

    Liked by 20 people

      1. EXACTLY!

        Lessons of history: China’s century of humiliation
        Repercussions of British opportunism during Opium Wars can be felt in geopolitics even today

        ….Rarely mentioned in Chinese history prior to the Tiananmen Square massacre of 1989, and glorified as a lesson on national humiliation thereafter, the Opium Wars (1839-1842 and 1856-1860) occupy a powerful position in Chinese discourse.

        It all started with the British discovering an ingenious trading system to reduce the empire’s mounting trade deficit after the conquest of India in the 18th century. By 1790, the deficit had risen to £28 million and swelled much beyond it by 1820, when the British trading community and the government found the perfect solution for the situation: Indian opium. Taking advantage of Chinese fondness for the Indian variety, British merchants bribed Chinese officials to allow entry of chests of opium shipped from British-ruled India, though such imports had long been banned by imperial decree in China. Between 1800 and 1818, the average annual traffic of opium to China was 4,000 chests (with each chest containing about 64 kilograms of opium); by 1831, the number of chests touched 20,000; and by 1840, when the British East India Company had lost its monopoly on the trade and the market was full of private merchants, the sales touched nearly 40,000.

        An attempt by the Chinese authorities to control the trade at the port of Canton by destroying large consignments of opium and publicly executing drug merchants resulted in a massive British army from India invading China, running through Canton and seizing the tax barges on the Yangtze. The blow proved disastrous. The Treaty of Nanjing signed in 1842 forced China to pay an indemnity to Britain and open four ports to it, and give up Hong Kong to the Queen. The Second Opium War (1856-1860), led by an Anglo-French coalition, ended in further ignominy for the Chinese: Beijing’s famed Old Summer Palace was gutted as a reprisal for the torture of a British mediation team; the treaties signed to conclude the war forced China to open full-scale trading relations with the West, legalise opium trade throughout the country, cede Kowloon and pay a total indemnity of 5 million ounces of silver to the British and the French….

        Liked by 11 people

  2. Great observation/catch/discovery!

    Think of all the drug money that has been laundered through HK and China, and then London(istan) and elsewhere.
    (Boxer rebellion, etc.). Then think of the -273.something (sorry)°C cold-hearted bankers and illuminati as described by Ronald Bernard, the Dutch Financier. He spoke of meetings with child sacrifices, but the interview with him started off with how the various money-laundering schemes work. Scary, and horridly-dishonest stuff.

    And in current events, Iran (he-ran, she-ran, they-ran) will be using them…

    Two songs come to mind: “Money, Money”, by ABBA, and “Money Makes The World Go ’round”, from Cabaret. And, from the Bible, “for the love of money is the root of all evil”…

    We’re watching it in real time. Here’s hoping and praying that folks rise up and put a stop to it!!!!!!!

    P.S. Merde-Kuh, et. al., just upped the price (read: TAX) for a ton of CO², aka “Carbon” from €10,00 to €25,00. So EVERYTHING will be going up in price, sometimes multiplied, as each transport and energy-consuming step will be additionally taxed…

    Leaving the Paris “accord” was nothing short of genius on VSGPDJT’s part. Then again, that’s why he’s VSGPDJT!!!

    Liked by 13 people

      1. I’ve gpt the transcription of it almost done – meant to post it before for singular Zoe…

        The part about the meeting with child sacrifice was what made him stop; but the intro (about an hour) of the interview was extremely revealing.

        And to think, all of our “trusted bankers, insurance companies/agents, trusted institutions, etc.” are in on it.
        In Uni, my RA (Resident Advisor) was on an accelerated (18-month) MBA program, which was EXTREMELY hard to get in to. He was sharp as a whip (good guy, no less), and worked from dawn ’til dusk to get through the program. But part of why he was in it was that his Daddy was a VERY high manager in a VERY WELL-KNOWN bank. Looked him up a while back, an he’s in about the same position that his father was way-back-when… I have to wonder what goes on at their meetings….

        Makes me sad…. He was a good guy, after all…

        Of course, in the music and engineering worlds, we’re all perfect 😀
        (Don’t believe a word of THAT!!!!!)…

        Here’s a comment I posted a while back. The whole interview is embedded in the comment; the part about child sacrifice is at the bottom. The whole interview is WELL WORTH WATCHING, (subtitles are both accurate and excellent, according to some Dutch friends)…

        Here is a description of the “power” behind the “power” of the elites. It also explains the DEMONcRATS support of abortion and other murder. The Cult of Moloch/Baal still exists, and is practiced at the highest levels of government (e.g. the Klintoons) and business (cf the video contained in this link).

        [I can’t get away from the fact that this fellow looks like Tim Allen. He seems to have gone through hell and back. GOD forgive and help us all. Ephesians 6:10-18 explains quite clearly what we’re up against.]

        The whole video (very informative and well worth watching) is at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEpcY5JU120 . It’s in Dutch, but the English subtitles are excellent, and accurate. The part which clearly describes what the elite are up to, and what power they worship, it here:

        Liked by 4 people

      1. Wolfie I did the calculations. it reduces the USA to the 1700s BEFORE the use of horse power. WITHOUT coal fired furnaces you can not make steel since we really do not have the forests to sustain making the charcoal as the fuel and reducing agent.

        SEE WIKI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_iron_and_steel_industry_in_the_United_States

        My response to a David Appell article many years ago:
        So Let us look at what real facts tell us.

        The average for the USA is 335.9 million BTUs per person. (Total population: 246,081,000)
        (wwwDOT)nuicc.info/?page_id=1467 or (wwwDOT)fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R40187.pdf

        In 1949, U.S. energy use per person stood at 215 million Btu. epb(DOT)lbl.gov/homepages/Rick_Diamond/docs/lbnl55011-trends.pdf

        The U.S. in 1800 had a per-capita energy consumption of about 90 million Btu. (Total population: 5,308,483) (wwwDOT)bu.edu/pardee/files/2010/11/12-PP-Nov2010.pdf

        If the USA reduces its energy consumption by 80% it equals 45.18 million Btu. per person, given the increase in technology and hydro power, lets use the 1800 consumption level of about 90 million Btu. per person. (Twice the Btus/per person)

        What does that mean?
        The site inventors(DOT)about.com/library/inventors/blfarm4.htm helps us figure that out.

        Farmers made up about 90% of labor force  in 1790 and 69% of labor force in 1800. (2.6% in 1990)

        About 250-300 labor-hours required to produce 100 bushels (5 acres) of wheat with walking plow, brush harrow, hand broadcast of seed, sickle, and flail in 1830. (This is all by hand not animal power BTW) (1987 – 2-3/4 labor-hours required to produce 100 bushels but that takes lots of oil.)

        1810-30 saw the transfer of “manufacturing” from the farm and home to the shop and factory. It wasn’t until the 1840′s that we saw factory made farm machinery, labor saving devices and chemical fertilizers became at all common. It was in the 1860′s that kerosene lamps became popular.

        Also up until the 1850′s dung and wood were the major source of energy. dieoff(DOT)org/page199_files/image002.gif

        In other words for the USA to use HALF the energy per person that was used in 1800 we must abandon ALL factories and 90% of the population must return to subsistence farming using animals if enough farm machinery can be produced.

        Remember in 1800 there was only 2% of the current population in the USA. Solar and Wind just are not going to produce enough power to keep us in anything but a few lights, a few wells and if we are lucky a refrigerator for the entire town. FACTORIES use a huge amount of power and that is why cotton mills and other primitive factories were built on rivers.

        Anyone who tries to tell you differently is talking baffle gab because at present less than 9% of the US labor force is in manufacturing. The USA got rid of most of its really energy intense industry like smelting the ores to make machines. The USA shipped its factories to China and I mean that literally because I knew a guy whose business was packing up and shipping factories in New England to Israel.

        “Cut CO2 emissions by 80% by 2050???

        What do they plan to do wipe out 75% of the population to do it?

        What no one ever mentions is civilization is built on energy.
        For most of history that energy was from slaves and animals. Only with the advent of machinery did abolishing slavery actually become a viable economic alternative. Get rid of dependable energy and the labor saving machines it powers and you have to substitute human and animal energy. Unfortunately this means a sharp reduction in food production, population and miserable living conditions for all but the select few.

        It only takes a day trying to clear brush from land with loppers and a buck saw to really appreciate a tractor or bulldozer and the harsh reality of what labor saving devices really are all about.

        Here is one (greenie) paper on energy use (It under estimates the pre-industrial ag era energy use drastically) (wwwDOT)wou.edu/las/physci/GS361/electricity%20generation/HistoricalPerspectives.htm

        The above paper has Advanced Agricultural Man as 26,000 Kcal per capita (1850’s) and the technological man of 1970 in the U.S. consuming approximately 230,000 Kcal of energy per day. ~ 8.8 times as much energy consumed) Other sources have the per capita use for the USA as 333.8 million BTUs per person in 2006 before the economy crashed: (wwwDOT)fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R40187.pdf

        Liked by 10 people

      1. Zoe, here’s the transcript for the interview. Hope I got the html tags matched and typed correctly 🙂
        (sorry, it’s a bit long, but well worth reading – valuable infos – makes one think twice before bankingI…

        Here’s the transcript of the English translation of the interview from https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/dutch-banker-ronald-bernard-blows-the-whistle-on-worlds-satanic-elite :

        Interviewer: Ronald, you have a very strong background in the financial sector, asset management, deposit trading, as far as I understood. Can you tell us something about your experiences?

        For how long did you work there?

        Bernard: Well, my experiences are more complicated than what you mentioned just now. Actually I have been an entrepreneur my entire life. Independence being the key component to me. I have once tried being an employee, but that didn’t work out. Being an entrepreneur, I have seen many sectors, amongst which I have experienced the financial world. All my other companies as an entrepreneur, like my own fashion line for ladies, car-dealership and also import-export, had me involved to such an extent with building up my own fortune, it inherently guided me into the world of finance. Working in import-export, you encounter different currencies and you have to go to the exchange to trade through brokers.

        One of these brokers said at some point, “Ronald, I’ve been looking at your life for a long time and you are always busy. You earn money, we know, but what is your goal?” I replied: “the only goal I have as an entrepreneur is to earn as much money as I possibly can” because the more money I have, the quicker I can retire, be free and of course have status, basically everything you want in this society. Or at least, that’s what I thought back then. So the broker said: “In that case, stop what you are doing now, stop with all those companies and just start dealing money, go into the financial world.”

        And that is the beginning of that situation that is connected to your original question. The broker, had a place in the exchange market and he dealt in currencies, deposits, so trading in assets to make money out of differences in interest rates, and that involved the aforementioned asset management. Those three aspects together formed the interesting package I said yes to. He said: “All right, you can take my place here, I’ll train you, introduce you to the network, but in exchange I want 10% of your annual earnings.” So he basically sold me his spot in the financial world and asked a 10% commission which I paid him. I said

        “Yes, fine with me!”

        Then he replied: “There is one thing you need to know. If you can’t put your conscience in the proverbial freezer, and I don’t mean on -18 degrees, but on -100, then don’t get involved in this.” Oops! That was the message, “you want a lot of money, you can obtain that, I can help you, but it comes at a great cost, because you cannot do this with a clear conscience.” Well, I laughed at that, I was young and naive. From my youth, from the way I came into life; my far from ideal youth led me to develop a certain view of the world and humanity.

        Interviewer: What do you mean by that? No warm, loving family?

        Bernard: My mother always did the best she could to make us feel loved, but she was hampered by that due to the behavior of the father, who caused us to feel more like we lived in a war zone with each other. That isn’t an exemplary situation to grow up in. As a child, growing up like that led me to believe that the world and humanity are far from great.

        Interviewer: So putting your conscience in the freezer was fitting in as a starting point?

        Bernard: I was, partially, already used to doing that out of self-preservation, so to put my conscience in the freezer was not an impossible task to me.

        Interviewer: So it became a survival mechanism to you?

        Bernard: Yes, yes. And my view of humanity and the world around me wasn’t exactly positive either. I only thought of myself, that’s the way I grew up to be out of self-preservation and I got into the deal. Which meant, that slowly, I build up a customer base. As I improved my skills within the network, I got deeper into the financial world, and then it turns out the world is really small, and you keep noticing that. Even when I was still working in import-export dealing in grain and such, you notice it is just a small circle. And if we talk about the hard core circle in the financial world, I don’t mean Miss Jean at the bank, but the big global flows of money which you use for trading.

        Interviewer: You are talking about world wide cash flows, so not the Netherlands in particular where you started working?

        Bernard: The Netherlands do play a distinct part in this story, but the world does not revolve around it. The Netherlands are part of a large global financial system in which you work through the exchange market if you want to do official transactions. And many banks who do the currency exchange get certain assignments from clients, which they can’t get away with easily. Then the need arises for people like me, who were the straw men where big money flows are involved. We used certain financial constructions, international legislation, to move the money in such a way making everything ‘OK.’ So all supervisors, regulatory bodies that are in place world wide, because they are… That no one wakes up seeing what is going on, like a year or two ago, with the scandal around Panama…

        Interviewer: The Panama Papers.

        Bernard: Yes.

        Interviewer: Yes.

        Bernard: Yes then…

        Interviewer: Tax evasion?

        Bernard: I think, well that was about avoiding taxes, tax evasion is when you break all the rules. This had to do with avoiding. But when you see what happened there, I’m like, “guys that is old news, and who are you boring with that?” Because it is peanuts and hardly relevant. However, for the common people, that is great news, but it is not anything big.

        But it does show there is something very wrong in this world. For example, there are people in the Netherlands, with certain positions, who have bank accounts in Panama with legislation that allows them not to pay taxes in the Netherlands, which is still completely legal. Constructions like that were part of my job, when we had to change currency. We had changes, the first boycotts in Iraq early ’90s, when there was a boycott in Iraq because of the war that started there. And we were confronted with what we called ‘Iraqi-dollar’ — Iraqi-dollars which were actually American dollars.

        The American dollar has a direct relation to the oil prices which made it a world trading currency backed up by oil. As long as that connection is in place, the dollar has value. Officially, the Iraqi people weren’t allowed to sell their oil due to the boycott. In theory, that is because never before was there such big business in oil, with discounts in this case, because officially it wasn’t allowed… so with discounts it still crossed the borders. Because the energy was always paid in dollars, these Iraqi-dollars had to go somewhere.

        You couldn’t just take them to the desk at the bank because all the regulations and checks did provide a certain protection, because money laundering and criminality wasn’t anything new back then. Now we call it terrorism, but that was then also the case. So then you need people to take the heat. As straw men you got invited to a bank in, for example, Germany, with basements full of trucks filled with money.

        Interviewer: Wow!

        Bernard: And then you think, “Sure… trucks, transports, a busy company.” Then they show you they are all filled to maximum capacity with dollars. And they tell you “We need to get rid of all this cash.” So change them for Pounds, German Marks, this and that, in such way, and it needs to go there and there.

        Interviewer: Are we now talking about money laundering? Or…

        Bernard: Well, processing cash. Processing cash in such a way that we can legally reintroduce it into the money circuit.

        Interviewer: So that was your task?

        Bernard: That was an assignment my colleagues and I got.

        Interviewer: Okay.

        Bernard: You are never alone on an assignment because you cannot do this on your own. It is not possible. We all know Scrooge McDuck scooping money with his shovel, well we literally had to do that over there. It was impossible to process all at once. So then you need to find a way. Cash used to be the predominant way of paying, where nowadays most is digital. But you tried to find a way to process the cash.

        How do you reintroduce the cash into the circuit so Iraq can deal in its oil without being hampered? Because they are the ones that own the money. Iraq doesn’t want to… Look, you mentioned money laundering, but what it was about the boycott, Iraq had to stick to the rules, and by, you know, everything you want to know about the world, you can know by following the money. That is the bottom line. Everyone can say “blah blah,” but make sure you follow the money, then you’ll find the truth. Same goes for that situation. So the only thing Iraq and their buying partners wanted was to remain free of any accusations.

        Because the partners who bought it were the ones placing the boycott in the first place. But they are actually all friends on the same side. Everybody thinks there are opposites like good and bad guys in the world, but on the higher levels it is just a game and they are all working together. However, they do have to stick to the rules and regulations, which they themselves have created to keep the rest of society suppressed and make sure that it will not be too crowded at the top. So you have to play by your own rules. So that is what is going on there, is to make sure that nobody can trace you. Apart from the elite themselves, nobody in the lower ranks can find out what really happened.

        Interviewer: Compartmentalized, that’s how we call it.

        Bernard: Yes.

        Interviewer: Everyone knows only his own little piece. Only the elite knows what is happening.

        Bernard: Yes, but because we were doing the dirty work, we had to know a lot. Because we couldn’t afford to make any mistakes.

        Interviewer: How high in the pyramid did you get? Were you close to the top of the pyramid?

        Bernard: Well, we were communicating with them.

        Interviewer: Okay.

        Bernard: My ego would have loved it to get to the position of belonging to the top itself. Nowadays we still talk about 8,000-8,500 people who run the entire world. It would have been amazing to get into such a position back then.

        Interviewer: All right, but if we say the top knows 100%, can you estimate how much you knew and understood of what happened?

        Bernard: In my work, I had to know 100% of what was going on.There was no other way, because the interests of the people involved were huge.

        Interviewer: Especially for the top.

        Bernard: Exactly. If I wouldn’t know all the details I would end up making mistakes. Which would cause a spin-off, because those mistakes would be detected. Then the people that don’t know anything about it would interfere. We are talking about having nerves of steel to function at this level.

        Interviewer: So did you have nerves of steel?

        Bernard: Yes, it worked just fine.

        Interviewer: The freezer worked very well for you…

        Bernard: Yes, I played at the highest level for about 5 years. And then it was totally over, out and done with. That was a very intense moment for me.

        Interviewer: That happened suddenly, or was there a reason?

        Bernard: Well, no, the thing is… I gave a small example of what was involved. So in this case, currency exchange. Dollar to something else, deposited in a safe manner, and managing assets well, so it could grow to rate of return, leading to reinvestments with the money. The level I played at in those 5 years, and that didn’t happen overnight, you need to earn your place. I am skilled at connecting the dots, information in order to achieve a full picture of all the things involved, that need to be taken into account within the playing field. Which is a very detailed process.

        You stand out when you are gifted in this. This is the reason I was trusted with the full 100% of the information where it concerned my jobs. So I didn’t know about everything they knew, but everything I needed to know regarding the case I was working with colleagues. I was often put in the leading role because I kept a good overview of the situation, and I was good at innovative thinking to solve the problem.

        I had fun, creating solutions in such a way to always stay ahead and outsmart them, staying within the rules of the game but playing around with them to make everything match up. I loved that game. However, on the other hand you had a great amount of responsibility and you learned more and more about the real world, since through the financial world you learn all of the actual truth.

        Interviewer: So you say “all”, in what regard?

        Bernard: Well, your clients give you glimpses of how the world actually works. In hindsight, I still didn’t know everything, but I did know a lot, because my clients were banks who didn’t want blood on their hands. But within those banks there is always a number of people who know damn well what is going on. So like 1% within a bank knows the truth of the matter regarding the happenings within the world, which is not surprising considering they are involved in the flows of money.

        Those are your clients. You also have governments to deal with, multinationals, you have to deal with secret services, and what they now call terrorist organizations. You get all of those groups that are involved with the big money as clients, then you start seeing the connections. So they might be compartmentalized as you just mentioned, regarding knowledge, but because I am in the middle I see how they relate to another; you see the money coming from this place, then going to that place, etc. You keep gaining information and thereby overview of what is really going on.

        Interviewer: So do you have to serve and keep all of those groups happy, including terrorist organizations, you were trying to keep everybody happy?

        Bernard: Yes.

        Interviewer: Dear God!

        Bernard: Yes. That was my job.

        Interviewer: Keeping all the balls in the air.

        Bernard: Yes, indeed. So one of the things that I found out that I did not know before, but now I do, is about secret services; you think they are there to serve and protect a people, country, etc. but they actually turn out to be criminal organizations, to be more precise, the system is heavily so. We are talking about financing wars, creating wars, so basically creating a lot of misery in this world. So lots of conflict. And then I think to myself, if only people knew what the world is really like. Secret services will stop at nothing. Nothing. But they also have their flows of money, because if they are trading in drugs or weapons, or for that matter, people… all that money has to go somewhere. Everything has to be financed.

        Interviewer: You say “if”, but could you confirm they are doing this?

        Ronald: All of them. All of them.

        Interviewer: Yes.

        Bernard: So the entire world as we think we know it, is just an illusion we believe in. Which is something you find out in this line of work, and where it all went wrong for me, to put it that way.

        Interviewer: ‘Right’, you mean, finally that is.

        Bernard: In hindsight, yes it was for the best, but my ‘freezer’ started to malfunction. There were things happening. For example, I went to a different trade market, and one of my colleagues there said: “Ronald, do you remember that case with the Italian lira?”

        I sometimes mention that during talks as well. “Do you remember those deals?” in which we did massive dumping of the lira, which reduced the value of the currency, which caused a company in Italy to be hit in such a way they went bankrupt. And then you hear at the exchange, “You remember that successful deal with the lira?” I say, “yes.” And then they say, “Did you know that the owner committed suicide and left a family behind?”

        Interviewer: Things like that… Ouch.

        Bernard: And back then we laughed at it. Ha ha ha, all together, all of us. We looked down on people, mocked them. It was just a product. Waste. Everything was worthless trash. Nature, the planet, everything could burn and break.

        Interviewer: Just useless parasites.

        Bernard: Just as long as we met our goals, as long as we were growing. Many of my colleagues ended up drinking or using drugs. Not me. Maybe I should have.

        Interviewer: Or not.

        Bernard: No, in hindsight, it was for the best and I’m happy to still be alive. However, all those horrible things started to eat at me.

        Interviewer: Can you give an example, because I can sense a lot of terrible things happened to you.

        Bernard: Yes, it is a difficult part for me to talk about.

        Interviewer: I can feel that, but only whatever you wish to share is all right.

        Bernard: Yes, I only talk about things I want to tell. But it does evoke lots of emotions and with my conscience not being in the freezer it touches me deeply.

        Interviewer: Can you tell me the worst thing that has happened that caused the tipping point in your situation?

        Bernard: Well, that was the beginning of the end. You get so deep into these circles, and you sign a lifetime contract. Not with blood or anything. To never disclose names of companies, organizations or people. I think that is why I am still alive. You have to stick to it. If we are talking about the worst things that I have experienced…

        I just told you about things that made the freezer glitch, my conscience started to show itself. Let’s put it this way, I was training to become a psychopath, and I failed. I did not complete the training, and didn’t become a psychopath. My conscience came back and the most difficult part for me was, because I had such a great status there, I was a success, I was trusted with the people playing at this level. To put it carefully, most of these people followed a not very mainstream religion.

        So you have Catholics, Protestants, all sorts of religions. These people, most of them, were Luciferians. And you can say “religion is a fairy tale, God doesn’t exist, none of that is real.” Well, for these people, it is truth and reality, and they served something immaterial, what they called Lucifer. And I was also in contact with those circles, only I laughed at it because to me they were just clients. So I went to places called Churches of Satan.

        Interviewer: So now we are talking about Satanism?

        Bernard: Yes, so I visited these churches, just as a visitor, dropped by, and they were doing their Holy Mass with naked women and liquor and stuff. And it just amused me. I didn’t believe in
        any of this stuff, and was far from convinced if any of this was real.

        Interviewer: It was just a spectacle to you.

        Bernard: Yes, in my opinion the darkness and evil is within the people themselves. I didn’t make the connection yet. So I was a guest in those circles and it amused me greatly to see all those naked women and the other things. It was the good life. But then at some point, which is why I’m telling you all this, I was invited to participate in sacrifices… abroad. That was the breaking point. Children. [CC: Bernard is visibly shaken]

        Interviewer: You were asked to do that?

        Bernard: Yes, and I couldn’t do that. Interviewer: Would you like to stop for a moment by the way?

        Bernard: No. And then I started to slowly break down. I lived through quite a lot as a child myself and this really touched me deeply. Everything changed. But that is the world I found myself in. And then I started to refuse assignments within my job. I could no longer do it. Which made me a threat.

        Interviewer: For them, of course.

        Bernard: I was no longer capable of functioning optimally. My performance started to shake and I had refused tasks. I had not participated. The purpose of the whole thing, eventually, in that world, is that they have everybody in their pocket. You need to be susceptible to blackmail. And blackmailing me proved to be very hard if I look back on it. They wanted to do that through those children. And that broke me.

        Interviewer: Is that – you are not telling me something new – what they also do in politics?

        Bernard: If you google this, you’ll find enough worldwide witness accounts to know this isn’t a Walt Disney fairy tale. Unfortunately the truth is that worldwide they have been doing this for thousands of years. I once studied theology and even in the Bible you find references to these practices with Israelites. The reason the first 10 tribes were banished to Babylonia was because of these rituals with children. Including the sacrificing of children. So this is pertinent, all this made me believe, because I realized there was more to life than meets the eye. There is a whole invisible world. It is real. You really do talk about a dark force and a manifestation of light. So I resorted to studying theology to make sense of it all.

        Interviewer: And psychology as well if I remember correctly?

        Bernard: Yes, but I did that in my first life. Because through commercial psychology, mass psychology, I was able to manipulate situations for my own benefit.

        Interviewer: That is scary, because if you dig into that you find Tavistock Institute and mind control, MK Ultra, Monarch and the like…

        Bernard: Yes, that is correct, but that was all part of the job. Through training at the job I got into that more deeply, because when you are making deals you also need to manipulate the media. You have to manipulate lots of things because nothing can be seen as it is. Everything has to appear to be something different.

        You see the people as a flock of sheep. You put a couple Border Collies and drive them in a direction. And to be honest with you, I still see that happening around me. People are still, through the systems and methods that we ourselves used to use, being treated in that same way. And it still works. People still don’t understand how it really works and are still on the level of “as long as I have my beer” and whatever, completely self absorbed, also a survival mechanism. I mean it is the program after all, but you still see how stupidly easy it is to put people in a certain direction. When you are the one pulling the strings, that is.

        Interviewer: Mass psychology.

        Bernard: Yes. Much later in all those studies and discoveries I found a document, which they are claiming is bullshit of course, the Protocols of Zion. And nowadays I recommend everyone to read the whole of that incredibly boring document. Just work through it, read it through.

        Interviewer: We are also talking about Zionism.

        Bernard: Yes, of course. If you read the Protocols of Zion, and really study them and understand, then it is like reading the newspaper of the daily life. How from their position of ultimate power, and ultimate it has literally become, but that is only because the people don’t stand up for themselves. They don’t realize what reality is.

        Interviewer: And we have all been programmed. If you dare say you are against Zionism, then you are branded an anti-Semite.

        Bernard: The negative, you can say evil, the Luciferians, Satanists, whatever you which you call it… it is a real entity. I have found that what is written in the Bible, and not just the Bible, you can find it in so many books, there really has been a moment of separation from the manifestation of light, in which a group went their own way and are carrying an intense hatred, anger; the people who do not underestimate the severity of this are but few.

        Because this is an all annihilating force that hates our guts. It hates creation, it hates life. It will do anything to destroy us completely, and the way to do that is to divide humanity. Divide and conquer is their truth. Humanity is a manifestation of light. That is the true creation. As long as you divide them based on political parties, skin color, you name it… then you – from a Luciferian point of view that is – suppress the full capacities of your enemy, their full power. They can’t stand up for themselves, because if that would happen, the Luciferians would lose. Then this monster, the greedy monster would disappear.

        I tell people about this old American general who puts an entire room of people in the dark. The eyes adapt to the darkness, but you can’t see a thing. The general doesn’t say a word and suddenly he flicks on a lighter. One little light. Due to the prolonged darkness, you experience a manifestation of light from a single point and everyone can slightly see each other again. And then he says “that is the power of our light.”

        Interviewer: Beautiful.

        Bernard: Unite. Unite. Come together, and this entire shit story seizes to exist. That’s how fast it could happen. But that is easy for me to say now, but then I was in a period of my life in which I was crumbling down.

        Interviewer: Could you tell us something specific about that?

        Bernard: I started to refuse assignments. My conscience came back after the request involving the children and I started to refuse more and more. I had a conscience and I couldn’t function anymore.

        Interviewer: But you did still show up to work after that?

        Bernard: I didn’t really have a choice, I had my own business with several offices and employees, everything was still rolling.

        Interviewer: That must have been hard.

        Bernard: Yes, it got very hard, all the tensions. So on the one hand, you are playing with money on a high level, in which you can’t afford to make mistakes, otherwise everything falls down at once, your entire business is ruined, everybody involved, including yourself. Then you are really screwed. So that brings a lot of stress, factoring in the resurfacing of a conscience. I was warned off when I got into this. “Don’t do it if you can’t put your conscience at -100 degrees in the freezer.”

        Interviewer: And you probably realized that then?

        Bernard: Yes, I heard myself laugh at it back then, but it wasn’t a joke at all. I totally did not understand where I really got into.

        Interviewer: And your proverbial freezer was switched off?

        Bernard: Broken. I couldn’t do it anymore. So I tried to work through it, keep up appearances. I didn’t know how to get out of this, I was trapped as well. Everybody was trapped. This all led me to crashing completely eventually. My body just simply stopped. The first thing I saw was my mother crying at the Intensive Care.

        Interviewer: You ended up at the IC?

        Bernard: Yeah, I really shut down.

        Interviewer: You had literally crashed?

        Bernard:Yes. Yes. And… at that time I didn’t believe in anything, but I can still recall how I saw, from that corner, I was looking down upon myself. I saw how they were working on me.

        Interviewer: You had a near death experience.

        Bernard: Well, you could call it that. I have seen I am not my body. I’m “in” my body, but I am not just my body. I have seen them working on me. And later on, I’ve been reluctant to talk about it for a long time. I really talked about it much later. But when I did, I had researched so many things already and started to believe. I was starting to better understand the spiritual and the material. At that point this intense experience got its own place. The realization that I’m not my body, it’s just a vessel. So I lived through all of that, but I also needed a long time to recover.

        Interviewer: Yes, of course.

        Bernard: Yes I was a train wreck. Complete wreck. I was completely burned out. I had crashed, and the body needed a year to recover. I don’t really want to get into it now, but in those circles I got tortured physically during my exit time. This was in order to make sure I would never break the contract of secrecy. So I was taken for a certain amount of time. I was “treated.” All those factors together, just increased the stress I was experiencing, literally running full speed towards my own end.

        Interviewer: Do you mean abductions, as we call it, or programming?

        Bernard:No, they exposed me to certain types of torture that makes sure you’ll never damage anyone in that world. It did all happen that way, so the end of my first life was so extreme that I couldn’t handle it anymore. I couldn’t handle it anymore, in no way.

        However, my mind power was so strong, that it only happened with and to my own body. That was… well, I didn’t know what to do anymore. There were no options left for me. So that is why sometimes I think – of course it is not true – but I wish, like so many colleagues, I had taken the drugs and alcohol route. At least my end would have been more gentle. Most of them are just dead by now. Even though I know there are more straw men walking around, there are little still alive whom I knew back then. Most of them are already gone. Well I was dead too, but I’m still here.

        Interviewer: So you still have something left to do.

        Bernard: Yes, I suppose you could say that. But that is, I can’t say in short, since I don’t know how long we have been talking, the world that I found myself in. If you have any specific questions, then I can answer them, but I had hoped to be more concise. But I just don’t know how.

        Interviewer: Well, you have my gratitude for all you have shared.

        Bernard:To me, it is a very big deal.

        Liked by 3 people

          1. Yes. But to take down the whole cabal you have to destroy their money game. Dawsonsfield has lot on lots of different places getting corruption rolled up but this I’d the centre of the web.

            Liked by 3 people

  3. Wolfie I’m sharing as soon as my eyes pop back into their sockets
    My daily prayer “Please Lord let me live long enough to see the Liberal crooks punished, especially Obama and Clintons. Yes I know there are more, but the list is so very long–probably over 1/2 the American State/Federal sitting & past politicians, and then a few hundred or more like few thousand other world leaders & big shot politicians.

    Liked by 11 people

  4. OMG Wolfie. I was right there with you, thinking HSBC was Big Club, but European Big Club, not Chynaa. How are we EVER going to get every sordid puppet-operator into the Venn diagram to expose the connections?

    This is a gigantic find of yours, and Comey/HSBC are a bind just like Biden/Burisma.

    The irony, of course, is it’s always OUR money that funds the evil, bails out the big guys (Ryan bailed Romney on Puerto Rican debt *spit*) and subsidizes the stealing (Green New Deal, my ass! Only if Green New Deal stands for them once again stealing our Green).

    The race to expose/educate vs. cover up/suppress rages on. Those bastards have been on a free ride for way too long. We need A Storm.

    Liked by 13 people

    1. Actually I thought everyone knew HSBC was a Chinese bank or I would have mentioned it when I first showed up here. I had an HSBC credit card and a lot of problems so I researched them a long time ago. (And cut up the card)

      Liked by 13 people

      1. Same here, Gail, regarding the bank’s founding in China land. Think I ran across them in researching the CIA’s drug running operations during the Vietnam Nam war (but not in direct relation to the CIA operation).

        Liked by 8 people

      1. Stupidly obvious, I guess, but “Follow The Money”… and “for the love of money is the root of all evil”… seem to get at the root of the problems…

        With taxes and energy costs what they are now over here (and getting higher all the time), we don’t have enough money to be evil 🙂 … or, rather 😦 (not that I want to be evil, I just don’t want to have too much month at the end of the money…..).

        Liked by 5 people

  5. May the good Lord protect and watch over us all

    if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land. 2 Chronicles 7:14

    Liked by 12 people

      1. Amen. Beautiful prayer…. especially “if it be Thy Will”… we often forget that… GOD’S Ways (and schedule) are not always the same as ours… but HE makes sure that it all works out OK in the end…

        Liked by 5 people

  6. I’m thinking there are a lot of people looking for confirmation of what some conspiracy people came up with in 2017 after FBI Anon said in 2016 that Comey wanted Hillary Clinton’s blood.

    If you look back in the sources of the supposed Clinton-Comey connection, it starts in March 2017 about the time Elise Stefanik was questioning him in open session and Trey Gowdy stopped her. I have an idea of what was happening there, but it’s not going to be all that popular of an opinion (she was about to blow their cover).

    I haven’t found a reference to a Comey-Clinton connection that surfaces before that. If someone has one that is not from Rense, Aim4Truth, and God forbid The Millennium Report, I’d like to see it. I mean, Comey started at the FBI AFTER Hillary Clinton was gone from the State Department. I’m curious as to how he could be a water carrier for her if the email investigation had not started yet. it can’t simply be being a director for a Chinese owned bank when the money laundered for Clinton influence came mostly from places like Saudi Arabia, Ukraine and other European nations.

    See, to me, I’m thinking there’s a lot more to Comey’s part in this play than the surface seems to say. I mean, it’s really rather curious that James Comey is the one and only figure in this entire play who is despised by both sides.


    Consider one of the hit pieces coming from fake news:


    “Former FBI Director James Comey drafted a statement exonerating former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for running her government emails through a private email server before completing the investigation, according to two Republican senators.

    “Comey prepared the draft exoneration for Clinton before conducting interviews with top Clinton aides who were offered immunity for their cooperation, Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley and Sen. Lindsey Graham said Thursday in a joint statement, citing transcripts of interviews with former Comey aides obtained by the Senate judiciary committee.”

    Why on June 14, 2018 were the 4 am talking points all about him being “insubordinate” to Loretta Lynch per the IG report to the degree that no less than John Podesta went on CNN to denounce him, and then the entire story line evaporated? Could it be that the Democrats realized they didn’t have to make a case demonizing him? That the job was already done by the conspiracy community? The Democrats aren’t that creative to have made that happen.

    Why were the Democrats trying to link his name with Rudy Giuliani’s in last week’s Senate show trial? We know why Rudy is a danger to them. Why would Comey be if he’s one of them?

    Some things are not just adding up.

    If this is a show, could it be that Comey is a character who is meant to hold our attention and keep the audience off kilter? Or is he really an Iago? I have my doubts we have a definitive answer at this point.

    Liked by 5 people

    1. Timeline of colonies government service(from Wiki):

      “Early career (1985–1993)[edit]
      After law school, Comey was a law clerk for United States District Judge John M. Walker Jr. in Manhattan. Then, he was an associate for Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher in their New York office. He joined the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, where he worked from 1987 to 1993. While there, he was Deputy Chief of the Criminal Division and helped prosecute the Gambino crime family.[36]”

      “Clinton administration (1996–2001)”

      “Bush administration (2002–2005)”

      “Comey was the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York from January 2002 to December 2003, and the United States Deputy Attorney General from December 2003 to August 2005 in the administration of President George W. Bush.”

      “7th Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (2013–2017)”


      Liked by 4 people

        1. Have to cross-reference with not just WHERE he was, but WHAT HE WAS DOING, with WHERE THE CLINTONS WERE, AND WHAT THEY WERE DOING.
          Then add WHO ELSE WAS INVOLVED (i.e. MUELLER, etc.)

          “What a tangled web we weave…”

          Liked by 4 people

          1. Quoting Shakespeare? was just thinking that this is MacBeth, Hamlet and Othello all rolled into one, the plot(s) are so tangled.

            I guess…a long time ago I learned to sit back and wait for information to surface, not to go looking to connect dots I want to be connected. It’s telling me that there’s more here than meets the eye, and we haven’t seen the truth to it all yet.

            I don’t buy it completely, and still think that revenge is in play.

            Liked by 3 people

        1. IMO it was because he pumped air into emailgate by “renewing” it at the last minute in October 2016.

          The problem is that the Dem faithful could not be told of the extenuating circumstances – that the FBI was FORCED to deal with the laptop, or the contents would be released publicly by others.

          Comey played a very tricky game there, to buy time for all floating copies of the laptop contents to get scarfed up by the “bad FBI” and “bad NYPD” plus deBlasio.

          Liked by 4 people

      1. Comey may yet turn out to be a ‘talker’.

        He knows enough spycraft to have created a foolproof Dead Man’s Switch…to release info in the event of his untimely death.

        I figure that is why he is still breathing.

        Liked by 5 people

          1. If it matches up with evidence…then that would be a way.

            Remember, it takes the sworn testimony of 2 people to get a conviction of Treason.

            Evidence alone is not enough.
            Unfortunately. 😕

            You have to have 2 people who witnessed the act of Treason, to get a conviction.

            Liked by 4 people

  7. Great catch, boss!

    This bank dates back to when the Brits had an Empire…1866.

    I believe that the elites in the UK would still like to see our ‘experiment’ in self-rule…fail.
    Even though the monarchy no longer rules there, the elitists still try to rule and have used socialist policies to enslave people with a dependency on govt entitlement programs.

    The ChiComs realized decades ago, that they needed money…and lots of it…to achieve their goal of world domination.
    They don’t care How they get it.
    They have no morals or ethics about how they accumulate it.
    It is all in the service of their main goal, which is world domination.

    The Globalist/NewWorldOrder elitists also want world domination.

    The ChiComs and the Globalists have the same goal…and seem to be using each other to achieve it.
    Do they have an alliance?

    Things like this HSBC suggest that there is some sort of alliance.

    But what I cannot figure…is what they envision will be the pecking order if they achieve their goal.

    Liked by 6 people

    1. “But what I cannot figure…is what they envision will be the pecking order if they achieve their goal.”

      That has always puzzled me. The Chinese have ALWAYS had nothing but contempt for other races. So why ever would a White European put trust in the Chinese?

      Liked by 6 people

  8. Trust the plan. Red pill everybody you can. Nothing can stop what is coming. Enjoy the show. WWG1WGA.

    In these things I believe because I have seen the following things in my world view:

    1) PDT killed all the cash draining, business sapping international multilateral deals along with the climate hoax pact.
    2) He tightened things up in the ME with Israel, SA and Egypt while throwing a wrench into Iran’s ambitions.
    3) He moved on to making bilateral trade deals.
    4) PDT and his honey badgers chose NOW to orchestrate the economic take-down of China now. You touch on it – they are the source of the funds and masters of the puppet strings controlling the traitors and sell outs in America. However, the Chi-coms are controlled by the globalist Cabal and that always circles back to European and American Illuminati connected families. It always comes back to them when you follow the money and the evil to its roots. The Clinton’s, Soetoro’s, etc. are just tools that get thrown away when they are no longer useful.
    5) Nigel, the Queen, and Boris join forces to orchestrate the start of the take down of the Euros from their position through Brexit, while being set up as the regional conduit for all Euros to work through to do business in America to escape tariffs. They cut the deal with PDT to MBGA.
    6) Poland is thrilled to take over Germany’s security role by providing the base of operations on the eastern front. Enjoy Putin, Germany.
    7) PM Abe is standing by on ready along with PM Modi of India and President Bolsonaro of Brazil.
    8) Rocket man agrees to be used in a tug of war with the Chi-coms to escape the hardliners.
    9) The Fed continues to squirm as they know they are in the gun sights of PDT.
    10) PDT declared America’s independence from all former handlers. The world’s military superpower has officially retired from Cabal assigned mercenary missions.
    11) Jerusalem – capital. Get over it, world
    12) NATO – pay up or lose out because the buck just stopped.
    13) UN – see NATO above. Call for the moving vans.
    14) WTO – buh-bye. No enforcement mechanism. Dead.
    15) World courts – Don’t even thing about it.
    16) Yellow vests – did you think he was not watching, Macron? You are on the agenda along with the rest of your Rothschild family.
    17) ISIS who?
    18) Safety zone for Kurds in N. Syria that Turkey honors near where Iran has been hiding the nuke development while American troops protect the oil (cash) fields? You don’t say…

    My take of where we are today:

    Just know that the enemy Cabal is loosely affiliated, decentralized, and is at cross purposes with each other at times. So they can be isolated and destroyed in segments. Military planning and all…

    So, China is at the crossroads. Chinese moderates see the only way to overcome their operational inefficiencies along with failed cultural control and engineering attempts are to break free of the hardliners who are completely owned by the Cabal. They are in the throes of an internal political/business civil war that could cause the total internal collapse of the country as the currency gets devalued and their economic base shrinks. The hardliners have turned to the Cabal controlled social media giants in America to help. The MSM is actually dead for all intents and purposes. Propaganda will not work, people want to be free. They will be free or China will go down.

    The saving of dealing with Israel for last per Q is clearly the cleansing of the Cabal from the Chosen. May the Lord be lifted high and praised. May He protect His people and leaders.

    Liked by 7 people

  9. Eh. This could be a very big can of worms

    According to Ukrainian Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko, following Shokin’s forced dismissal, the Burisma investigation was transferred to Sytnyk’s NABU, which then reportedly closed the investigation sometime in 2016.
    Sytnyk publicly disclosed the contents of the Ukrainian “black ledger” to the media, which implicated Trump’s campaign manager, Paul Manafort.

    The revelation would force Manafort from the campaign.

    Manfort’s signatures have never been verified.


    Liked by 2 people

    1. There’s a REALLY interesting threadreader in the middle of the comments to that tweet…

      No wonder Adam’s so Schiffty…. seems like he had the chef, erm, served… sort of a “Standard” event in those parts…

      Liked by 2 people

  10. 4h
    Thomas Wictor @ThomasWic

    For @HeshmatAlavi

    I’d like you to consider something.

    Here’s a terrible story.

    Backer of Iraq Anti-Government Protests Killed in Baghdad


    Thomas Wictor @ThomasWic
    There’s no doubt who’s committing these murders, right?

    The murders have a dual purpose:

    One, they’re meant to intimidate the protestors.

    And two, they’re intended to goad the protestors into carrying out their own murders, which will have two repercussions.

    One, people will turn against the protestors, and two, the government will have its rationale for cracking down.


    Thomas Wictor @ThomasWic
    After we overthrew Saddam Hussein, Sunni Muslim terrorists murdered so many Shi’ite Muslims that the Shia formed retaliatory death squads.


    The Iranian mullahs’ agents were also murdering both Sunni and Shia.

    All of this forced the Iraqis to turn to Iran for protection.

    This playbook is being used again.


    Thomas Wictor @ThomasWic
    But what happens if the people committing these murders simply disappear without a trace, and nobody ever takes credit or even comments?

    The Syrian Civil War began with tit-for-tat murders.

    In Sudan, outsiders murdered both protestors and security forces.

    Of the 100+ bodies pulled from the river, 69 were soldiers and Rapid Deployment Service members.

    But the playbook failed in Sudan.


    Thomas Wictor @ThomasWic

    There were snipers and agent provocateurs disguised as protestors.

    Why didn’t the playbook work in Sudan?

    It’s because the people trying to derail the revolution all disappeared.

    The Sudanese were very cryptic. They never identified the ones who committed the murders.

    And then ALL SIDES turned to Trump.


    Thomas Wictor @ThomasWic
    Of course Sudan is culturally very different from Iraq and Iran.

    But it’s clear that the people who were causing the trouble simply disappeared.

    My guess is that they were mercilessly killed by people who are the most skilled unconventional-warfare specialists in the world.

    These specialists are on a mission to fix the Middle East.

    The only way it can be done is in secret.


    Thomas Wictor @ThomasWic
    When I say “secret,” I mean secret FOREVER.

    In the past few decades, people have become addicted to fame and accolades. They reveal secrets in books so that they can be interviewed on TV.

    But I know from studying the currents wars in the Middle East that there are still clandestine operators who will NEVER reveal their secrets.

    The stakes are too high.


    Thomas Wictor @ThomasWic
    The only way you can convince people to trust you is to show them that you will never spill the beans.

    We won’t have a repeat in Iraq of what happened after the 2003 invasion.

    It’s clear that major combat operations in Yemen are over.

    And we’ll never know exactly what happened.

    The Yemeni Republican Guard carried out one of the greatest military deceptions in history.


    Thomas Wictor @ThomasWic
    At the beginning of the war, they fought with the Houthis.

    In December of 2017, they switched sides.

    But it turned out that they were never on the side of the Houthis. They were learning everything about the Houthi war machine.

    The Republican Guard returned to Aden, were given state-of-the-art weaponry, and then they disappeared.

    They rolled up the Houthis in total secrecy.


    Thomas Wictor @ThomasWic
    At one point, there were 18 ground offensives being carried out simultaneously.

    Though it’s clear that the Houthis have been defeated, NOBODY’S SAYING SO.

    This is a completely new approach to warfare. We finally have warriors who don’t care about fame and applause.

    All I can talk about is the the things I know for sure.

    The Yemeni Republican Guard fooled EVERYBODY.

    Except their secret allies.


    Thomas Wictor
    You can be sure that clandestine operations–HUGE operations–are being carried out in Iraq and Iran.

    And now I’m positive that the mullahs never anticipated these.

    They hold Arabs in contempt.

    And underestimating your enemy is a fatal mistake.


    Liked by 3 people

  11. Scott Adams @ScottAdamsSays
    Remember when my critics kept insisting that Trump is not that persuasive? That was before he convinced the entire Democratic party to help him get reelected while dismantling their own credibility. #Shampeachment

    Liked by 3 people

  12. “As the Senate moves to confirm 13 more
    judges, remember that McConnell fan

    “Based solely on objective legal credentials, the average Trump appointee has a far more impressive resume than any past president’s nominees”

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s