20191115: Shampeachment ~ Marie Yovanovich

Uncategorized 5 Minutes

What’s the over/under on Marie breaking out into tears during testimony? Marie thinks President Trump was mean to her, implies she “feels threatened”. Really, Marie?

From President Zelinsky to President Trump: “……It was great that you were the first one who told me that she was a bad Ambassador because I agree with you 100%. Her attitude towards me was far from the best as she admired the previous President and was on his side. She would not accept me as a new President well enough.“

July 25, 2019, Oval office phone call. https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/25/read-donald-trump-releases-transcript-with-ukranian-president-volodymyr-zelensky/

Background: Yovanovitch was born in 1958, in Canada. Her parents were Russian emmigrees, moved to Connecticut at age 3. Parents were professors, taught Russian. She grew up speaking Russian. Naturalized American citizen at age 18. Graduated Kent School in ’76, went to Princeton, BA in History and Russian Studies, entered foreign service. Posts in Canada, Moscow, London, Mogadishu, and Kyrgyzstan. Deputy Chief of Mission in Kiev, Ukraine from August 2001 to June 2004 (right up to the Orange Revolution). Then appointed Ambassador to Kyrgyzstan, Ambassador to Armenia. Back to State Dept in 2011, helped get rid of missiles in Poland (bad idea-Obama gave it away and got nothing in return). Announced as Amb to Ukraine on May 18, 2016 (note date), approved August 29th of 2016, just in time for US election.

No mention of husband or children.

Link to Yovanovitch prior testimony: https://intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=757 https://docs.house.gov/meetings/IG/IG00/CPRT-116-IG00-D003.pdf

Our General Complaint –

  • Yovanovich got 4 cases dismissed.
  • Passed along info damaging about Trump campaign
  • Used her office as Hillary Clinton headquarters, working with Glenn Simpson and Fusion GPS.
  • Yovanovich is also implicated in the Black Ledger docs which magically appeared (implied Manafort was receiving millions in cash payments) and were supplied to the prosecutors in Ukraine along with a simultaneous delivery to the New York Times.
  • May 2019, After Durham’s visit to Ukraine, Yovanovitch was fired and the evident outrage by the left was for good reason. This is where the Atlantic Council, AntAC, but more importantly Nellie Ohr and her mentor’s involvement in #crossfirehurricane, came to light.

Yovanovitch and Sergiy: As an Ambassador to the USA, worked with an MP in Parliament, Sergiy Leshchenko.

Leshchenko is a hard left fascist radical (used to be an investigative journalist) who leaked the Party of Regions docs on Manafort to the NYTimes. He was found GUILTY of the leak, convicted for meddling in a US Election of 2016. The conviction was overturned on “standing of suing party” and “statute of limitations” technicalies. No denying Sergiy did it – he’s proud of it. He doesn’t seem to understand he’s an MP now and not a rag reporter with journalist immunity to smear. Almost 100% consensus the documents were faked, provenance is sketchy, but the trick worked and Manafort was forced to resign the following day. https://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/229471/ukrainian-mp-manafort-secrets

Yovanovitch and Lutsenko: Chief Prosecutor Yuri Lutsenko claimed Yovanovitch gave him a “do not prosecute” list. State Dept denied it. Lutsenko backed off claim to avoid tension with our State Dept, but Lutsenko’s notes on the meeting specifically mention “do not prosecute list”. https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/434875-top-ukrainian-justice-official-says-us-ambassador-gave-him-a-do-not-prosecute

Yovanovitch and PRESIDENT Zelinsky: Zelinsky does not like Yovanovitch and implied she told him she preferred the previous President. I believe that’s from the phone call on July 25th – Again:

From President Zelinsky to President Trump: “……It was great that you were he first one who told me that she was a bad Ambassador because I agree with you 100%. Her attitude towards me was far from the best as she admired the previous President and was on his side. She would not accept me as a new President well enough.“

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/25/read-donald-trump-releases-transcript-with-ukranian-president-volodymyr-zelensky/

Yovanovitch and George Kent: In her testimony, Marie claims she never spoke to George about Burisma or Hunter Biden. Really? George Kent was her Deputy. George Kent complained about the appearance of conflict of interest for Hunter Biden, to the VP’s staff, directly…….. but he never spoke to Marie?

Yovanovitch and Giuliani: Judge for yourself.

Yovanovitch Surveillance of Americans: (Judicial Watch) Judicial Watch has obtained information indicating Yovanovitch may have violated laws and government regulations by ordering subordinates to target certain U.S. persons using State Department resources. Yovanovitch reportedly ordered monitoring keyed to the following search terms: Biden, Giuliani, Soros and Yovanovitch.  Judicial Watch has filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the State Department and will continue gathering facts from government sources.

Prior to being recalled as ambassador to Ukraine in the spring Yovanovitch reportedly created a list of individuals who were to be monitored via social media and other means.  Ukraine embassy staff made the request to the Washington D.C. headquarters office of the department’s Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs. After several days, Yovanovitch’s staff was informed that the request was illegal and the monitoring either ceased or was concealed via the State Department Global Engagement Center, which has looser restrictions on collecting information.

http://patriotcrier.com/judicial-watch-evidence-ousted-trump-obama-appointee-ambassador-marie-yovanovitch-illegally-monitored-u-s-citizens/

“This is not an obscure rule, everyone in public diplomacy or public affairs knows they can’t make lists and monitor U.S. citizens unless there is a major national security reason,” according to a senior State Department official. If the illicit operation occurred, it seems to indicate a clear political bias against the president and his supporters. 

Hidden in the new law – Section 1287 – are the funding and guidelines necessary to establish a Global Engagement Center.  The wording is sufficiently vague enough for the GEC to become a Ministry of Truth.

http://patriotcrier.com/judicial-watch-evidence-ousted-trump-obama-appointee-ambassador-marie-yovanovitch-illegally-monitored-u-s-citizens/

Section 1287, (a) Establishment, (2) Purpose: The purpose of the Center shall be to lead, synchronize, and coordinate efforts of the Federal Government to recognize, understand, expose, and counter foreign state and non-state propaganda and disinformation efforts aimed at undermining United States national security interests.

From 2017

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 into law last Friday while Americans were busy making their last minute Christmas preparations. The vote in the Senate on December 8th was 85-13 where its sponsor was John McCain.  Only two Republicans voted against the final version before it was sent to President Obama to sign.  It had passed the House a week earlier by a vote of 375-34 with no more than 5 Republicans voting against it.  Paul Ryan wasn’t one of them.

Hidden in the new law – Section 1287 – are the funding and guidelines necessary to establish a Global Engagement Center. 

Yovanovitch will play the victim.

State Dept has rallied around her

WASHINGTON, DC – JANUARY 20: President-elect Donald Trump (C) and President Barack Obama (R) are greeted by members of the Congressional leadership including House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) as they arrive for Trump’s inauguration ceremony at the Capitol on January 20, 2017 in Washington, DC. Trump became the 45th president of the United States. (Photo by J. Scott Applewhite – Pool/Getty Images)

“……“bribery” as defined under the constitution for impeachment speaks to the President receiving cash or value to take an action for the benefit of a foreign power. [Pelosi has the entire thing reversed]…” SD

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/11/14/speaker-pelosi-rolls-out-plan-d-bribery/?fbclid=IwAR2DwbWG4bT25nFbapxsmAqOx_k8wynhMrdpswLvnSaCpSBjD_LREIxwmI0

Published by daughnworks247

Owner of a small business in middle of USA.

Published

442 thoughts on “20191115: Shampeachment ~ Marie Yovanovich”

  1. Liked by 12 people

    Reply

  2. Well said, Counselor.
    He’s right.
    No witness tampering.

    Liked by 8 people

    Reply

  5. Liked by 13 people

    Reply

    1. Trump was allowed over 4000 appointees.
      Yet with Schumer blocked approval in the Senate, it would have taken 87yrs of constant debate to approve them all.
      Schumer Obstructed the Trump Administration and the voter’s will.

      Liked by 8 people

      Reply

  7. This entire Schiff/Pelosi “impeachment hearing” (it’s STILL being called that per ABC and FOXNEWS radio news reports today, instead of “impeachment INQUIRY hearing”) is just for show.
    The “committee”, controlled by DemocratCommunists, has already decided to draw up Articles of Impeachment for the House to vote on as soon as possible. Of course it will pass.
    So — the ACTUAL focus of attention needs to be on the SENATE — now.
    What’s The Turtle’s strategy? Does he have a plan to kill a Senate trial before it starts? Did he really mean it when he stated that if the “whistleblower” doesn’t commit to testify before the Senate, then “impeachment” is DOA? Does he TRULY have a solid bloc of Republican Senators to vote No IF it comes to a Senate trial?

    Liked by 6 people

    Reply

      1. Covadonga
        Agreed.
        It bothers the CRAP out of me that the fate of the Presidency of Donald J. Trump has ANY potential to rest on the PERHAPS NOT ROCK-SOLID shoulders of Mitch McConnell.

        Liked by 6 people

        Reply

      2. Covadonga I had a realization about the turtle he is from Louisville that is a left wing conclave.
        He is straddling the fence one leg in the conservative Trump site the other moderate constituents.
        I do not know how he was elected in the first place unless he always has been a moderate with some quirks.
        He also is beholden to the puppet masters who pull his strings who support is reelections. He is in a precarious situation.
        My emotional reaction to him is that he should be primaries but no republican would win his seat because of the left wing composition of his district. I do not know how many conservative republicans are living there?
        Better to keep the evil we know than the evil we do not know or the evil who will be democrat socialist.

        Liked by 3 people

        Reply

        1. Despite my thoughts about Turtle, he may live in Louisville, a democratic area, but as Senator he was elected by the entire state of Kentucky. Looking at the recent election it s clear that Republicans are in control of the majority of the state.

          Liked by 5 people

          Reply

        2. His legacy of pushing through Constitutionalist Judges will outlive him and (probably) most of us here today. The Judiciary is the last hope for true justice, and a corrupt judiciary is the only hope for the DEMONicRATS. Now that VSGPDJT and McConnell are returning the Judiciary to its Constitutionalist/Originalist roots, the wicked wiles of the left can be halted there (if not earlier)…

          Liked by 5 people

          Reply

        3. I’m am not concerned about whether he represents himself as a conservative or a moderate. The most important question, for me, is whether he is truly Deep State or truly a Constitutionalist.

          He is

          Like

          Reply

    2. i gotta wonder if the theories are true that POTUS welcomes the chance to have the trial in the Senate where his attorneys can call all these treasonous POS to testify…really blow the lid of this thing…you KNOW everyone will be watching and waiting for that…dunno

      Liked by 9 people

      Reply

      1. I’ve suspected that all along. I think that by doing so, it will open the door for military tribunals. Gitmo’s been upgraded and expanded. The only question is what is going to trigger the events that will fill up Gitmo.

        Liked by 9 people

        Reply

      1. “Nervous Nancy” D’Alessandro might not be up to calling it to a vote.

        Her internal polls have got to be telling her it would end Dim majority next year, if she could even whip enough in her caucus into voting for it now.

        Speakership is important to her.

        Liked by 1 person

        Reply

    2. He has to appeal this.

      Obstruction…of what?
      There was no crime in the first place!

      This just further illustrates that the jury pool in DC is hopelessly tainted and biased against our President, his administration and his friends.

      The booing at that game was a big example of the bias for all to see.
      This conviction of a non-crime is another.

      Liked by 6 people

      Reply

    1. The enemy will dissect and use POTUS twittering against him. I am sure POTUS cleared his twitter speaking of the diplomat with his lawyer ? I am sure he would not shoot himself purposely in his foot? As President he has enough discernment not getting himself in trouble.

      Liked by 2 people

      Reply

    1. from the comments above, Marie fancies herself Joan of Ark– dodging bullets and a hail of gunfire while single-handedly saving Ukraine from Russia…it was epic–no doubt a movie of the week coming about it

      Liked by 8 people

      Reply

        2. I told you about this woman DP. Not only is she EVIL she is batshit crazy too. She is NECK deep in the black ledger scheme that took down Manafort. My bet, she TOO is on someones payroll, and it AIN’T the United States. I want someone, ANYONE to ask her about the surveillance SHE had put in place on Journalists like John Solomon and Sara Carter. Then ask her about her NOT allowing Visas to Ukrainian diplomats who were trying to give the FBI and State Dept EVIDENCE of the 2016 Ukrainian interference…she NEEDS to explain that before she portrays her self as Marie Yovanovich, super Ambassador.

          Then, when she is reeling, and sobbing all her fake tears, ask her just WHY she handed the Ukraine prosecutor a don not prosecute list, and just WHO authored that list and asked her to deliver it.

          Liked by 6 people

          Reply

          1. So, essentially, we’re reliving the 9-11 hearings when the people who all but made it happen were all on the blue ribbon panel questioning the Bush administration people left holding the flaming bags of poop.

            The seats are just switched.

            Lovely.

            Liked by 7 people

            Reply

            1. EXACTLY. Projection on a GRAND impeachment level. The foxes are in charge of the hen house. It is EXACTLY what the Founding Fathers sought to PROHIBIT in the Constitution with the 3 co equal branches.

              Answer me THIS, and THIS is where I would GO to STOP this farce once and for all.

              Ready?

              We are a representative Republic…right?
              We ELECT representatives in Congress to fight for OUR rights, and OUR prioities, and OUR objectives. Right?
              Well, IF OUR representatives are NOT allowed to speak, they are therefore NOT allowed to REPRESENT US. Right?
              That means that not only Trump is being denied his due process, and Constitutional rights, so are WE.

              It is OUR representatives that are being stymied and funneled through a SINGLE person and prism, Adam Schiff, and the democrat view,

              That makes this ENTIRE exercise not only a FARCE, it makes it UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

              Someone should SUE for THAT very reason. That would FORCE, by the THIRD branch, the SCOTUS, to END this illegal farce, and if they want to redo it, they would be FORCED to at least allow OUR representation without FILTER.

              Thoughts? I know your hubby is a lawyer, right? What is his opinion on that tactic. We as citizens, without representation, SHOULD have standing, and it would have to be expedited due to the ongoing current harm.

              Liked by 3 people

              Reply

              2. NO, I meant it for you, but the question still holds for both of you. I apologize for confusing you, working and following here, got confused on who I was replying too. I would LOVE to hear yours, Daughn’s and Wolfe’s thoughts on the question.

                Liked by 2 people

              3. My first comment is be grateful MY representative is not on this committee.

                Second, of course it’s unconstitutional.

                BUT, that being the case, I would imagine all of this happening leaves Schiff, Pelosi, et al, open to federal prosecution.

                You gotta look for a silver lining.

                Liked by 3 people

        1. Schiff has implemented Russian communist rules and Nazi tactics.
          Be scarred people this is what communism looks like. People in the past have been railroaded like this and worse.
          This is not the US I studied about for Citizenship.

          Liked by 7 people

          Reply

    2. If that’s the case, can we just skip to the transcript? I mean, even for a lot of Democrats the whole point of watching is Jordan, Ratcliffe, and Stefanik.

      Talk about stacking the deck.

      And these people aren’t even worth looking at. Honestly, that scarf hasn’t been in style in 25 years.

      Liked by 5 people

      Reply

  22. How on earth would she know if the policy was going to remain the same under a new administration.

    This chick is just one more swamp creature ticked off a new way of doing things was implemented without anyone listening to her.

    Well, babe, get used to it. This is the way the real world works.

    Liked by 8 people

    Reply

    1. They think they shape foreign policy, and they are having to learn the hard way — in front of a national audience — that that’s the president’s job. Which tells me they should not have held their positions in the first place, if they don’t understand the basics of the job.

      Liked by 8 people

      Reply

      2. The St. Gallen Mafia is a group of prelates who used to meet in St. Gallen, Switzerland, to plot how to “modernize” the church. Their first choice for the papacy was Joseph Bernardin who died in 1996. Most of the original members are dead, but they are pretty much the hard core liberals.

        Liked by 3 people

        Reply

  23. Schiff is pretending that his little irregular, constantly shifting rules, sh-t show inquiry is a court of law. His witnesses are comically completely related to facts, evidence, first-hand knowledge. Now Schiff is accusing Trump of ‘witness tampering’ when the woman is not a witness to anything except her own hurt feelings for being fired.

    Harvard law school really failed this time, giving Schiff a law degree.

    Liked by 7 people

    Reply

  24. Maybe Yananovich is really screeching because she’s caught between a rock and a hard place – between two ruthless bosses – Hillrotten and Putin.

    AND we know what happens to people who ‘disappoint’ either one of those.

    Liked by 2 people

    Reply

  26. Moved…mmm…a lot of people have been moved to the restroom listening to this.

    Liked by 6 people

    Reply

  31. Marie Admits Lutsenko wanted to track the 40 billion which was pilfered from Ukraine but would not grant visas to those who had proof and wanted to cooperate with our DOJ to track funds and prosecute.

    Liked by 6 people

    Reply

      1. Almost forgot, just WHO was Putin’s bitch again…oh yeah it was …Barack ” Tell Vladimir I’ll have more flexibility after the election”, Ill remove the missiles from Poland, give Russia technology to build their OWN Silicon Valley, let Russia “annex” Crimea, and sell 20% of OUR Uranium to Russia, Obama.

        Liked by 6 people

        Reply

        1. The way these Soviet-schooled, opposition-controlling red diaper exemplars FAKE being anti-Russian just makes me want to scream “Wake UP!” at the sheep – and with similar effect.

          “BAAAAAAA! BAAAAAA! UKRAIIIIIIINE! SHE SAID UKRAIIIIIIIINE! ORANGE REV GOOD! ORANGE MAN BAD!”

          Liked by 2 people

          Reply

            1. He sucked $45 million out of our U.S. Treasury that could have been spent on useful projects other than a phony investigation of Russia, Russia, Russia that was a total waste of time and money.

              Yeah, he deserves all the disrespect he gets here.

              Liked by 1 person

              Reply

      3. Bad taste would be Mueller eating shit instead of dirt.
        I have no good words for the traitor,even if it comes out he is a white hat he is still a piece of shit in my book.

        Like

        Reply

  37. THIS! This is one of the reasons we put up with this farcical melodrama.

    Liked by 7 people

    Reply

    1. Wow! That is the look of abject terror on Schiff’s face! He is mortified of having any Republican ask the “wrong” questions. He’s obviously afraid of what Rep. Stefanik has to say. This should go viral ten times over.

      Liked by 7 people

      Reply

  38. I’ve been looking today, but so far can find nothing written up about President Trump’s revelation at last night’s rally that the Ukraine Foreign Minister proclaimed there was absolutely no connection between the U.S. foreign aid to Ukraine and the investigation into Ukrainian influence of the 2016 election.

    President Trump specifically asked for that to be reported today, but so far nobody has. Despicable, especially for Fox News. Unless I missed something. Correct me if I did, please.

    Liked by 4 people

    Reply

  40. Hehe
    Well that was an ace up the sleeve.
    GGOGOGOOOOOO, Elise Stefanik

    She found the deposition from when Marie was confirmed……… and looky here………. she was questioned specifically about the conflict of interest of Hunter Biden.

    Liked by 10 people

    Reply

  41. Marie repeats again, NOOOOOOOOOooooooooooo crowdstrike problem
    The intel community has proven conclusively that Russia was the source of the problem.

    WRONG.

    Liked by 9 people

    Reply

    1. Dems have no principles and are all about mob rule. If we didn’t have what is left of the Constitution, they would have physically hauled Pres. Trump and VP Pence out of the WH by now and installed Pelosi.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

  46. Seriously, what is the fixation with Giuliani?

    Liked by 4 people

    Reply

        1. I always say DC needs an enema but now I believe the only answer is to burn the fucking sewer to the ground,salt the ground and rebuild it as our founding fathers would have DC….
          P.S AND GET THE FUCKING LAWYERS OUT OF POLITICS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
          I do not apologize for yelling,I have had enough my family didnt sacrifice blood sweat and tears for this BULLSHIT.

          Liked by 1 person

          Reply

  47. Ms Sewell, Congresswoman

    Al about compliments ——— Ahhhhh she is so smart.
    So what.
    How did it feel to have your reputation sullied?
    It affects your family.
    Horrible
    I want to know how this hurts you personally

    But they have no qualms of harming the President.

    There is a question of why this kind of campaign happened, all he had to do was say he wanted a different ambassador

    Apparently he did – he wanted her out from the summer of 2018

    Congressman says it is not against the law but should be against decorum.

    Chilling effect throughout the state dept

    People don’t know if their efforts to pursue the stated policy will be supported
    State Dept on edge?

    It’s about DAMN TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Liked by 7 people

    Reply

    1. Yep. That’s the price one pays for being a PUBLIC SERVANT.

      Servant.

      They never seem to understand that word…

      The only thing the swamp critters are is Public SERPENTS… which reflects upon their true master… a prime example of which is Adammed Schiffty, the pencil-necked freak…

      Liked by 3 people

      Reply

  49. Marie says she has to think about what is right for the USA.
    Well, not working with Soros is right for the USA
    But she did it.

    I want a full financial panel on this woman. I would be subpoenaing records.
    Looking for the money, cuz I guarantee she has it hidden.

    Liked by 8 people

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s