Dear KMAG: 20190829 Open Topic

NOTE: This is the last of the James Coburn HOT AUGUST open thread posts. Enjoy him while you can, ladies. Next month is LIGHT IN SEPTEMBER, in which we do our part to turn this world from DARK TO LIGHT, followed by the month of ROCKTOBER, during which we celebrate our wonderful President, ROCK STAR TRUMP.

3082
US General: Google Refuses to Work with US Mil but Provides “Direct Benefit” to China’s Mil
Q!!mG7VJxZNCI15 Mar 2019 – 1:09:04 PM
https://twitter.com/HawleyMO/status/1106247367177764865📁
Dark to LIGHT.
Q

Q Post 3082

This HOT AUGUST [29] [PLACEHOLDER] THURSDAY open thread is VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA / KAG! / KMAG world (KMAG being a bit of both MAGA and KAG!).


Say goodbye to Jame Coburn! He had a great month!

You can say what you want, comment on what other people said, and so on.

Free Speech is practiced here. ENJOY IT. Use it or lose it.

Keep it SOMEWHAT civil. They tried to FORCE fake Orwellian civility on us. In response, we CHOOSE true civility to defend our precious FREEDOM from THEM.

Our rules began with the civility of the Old Treehouse, later to become the Wolverinian Empire, and one might say that we have RESTORED THE OLD REPUBLIC – the early high-interaction model of the Treehouse – except of course that Q discussion is not only allowed but encouraged, and speech is considerably freer in other ways. Please feel free to argue and disagree with the board owner, as nicely as possible.

Please also consider the Important Guidelines, outlined here in the January 1st open thread. Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven.


SAY IT LOUD, AND SAY IT PROUD!

MR. PRESIDENT – I AM PRAYING FOR YOU!


AND WHAT TIME IS IT?

TIME TO….

DRAIN THE SWAMP

Our movement

Is about replacing

A failed

And CORRUPT

Political establishment

With a new government controlled

By you, the American People.

Candidate Donald J. Trump

Also remember Wheatie’s Rules:

  1. No food fights.
  2. No running with scissors.
  3. If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.

Let’s see if we can tell this story in James Coburn pictures. You ready?

Here we go!

August is going to be an interesting month.

Oh yeah? Just HOW interesting, we might ask.

Well, based on the LEAD-UP, I’d say we’re gonna see some enemy action.

Actors Henry Fonda and James Coburn on the set of Universal Studios movie ” Midway” in 1976. (Photo by Michael Ochs Archives/Getty Images)

OK. Should we be worried?

HA! You’re kidding – right?

Nope. We are gonna WIN this sucker.

Nevertheless, we have to be careful.

We have to be smart.

We have to be cool.

We definitely have to be wary.

Some of us may have to be a bit stealthy.

Some of us may simply be on vacation.

Others may not simply be on vacation.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is jamescoburncafescene.jpg

We have to stay strong….

But we also have to have some fun!

Now in the periodic, random, unpredictable, and unexplained absences of GROWLING, SNARLING WOLVES….

There may be what seem like explosive situations….

However, we believe that higher powers….

And FAITH IN PEACE and IN OURSELVES….

Are all we need to WIN and WIN BIG in this GIFT of a lovingly designed universe.

So stick around for a GOOD TIME.

ENJOY THE SHOW!

Maybe have some POPCORN!

I mean – who KNOWS how much winning there will be?

We are gonna have ONE HECK OF A GOOD TIME!

Because…..

Where We Go One, We Go All.


See you again some other month, James. You done good.

W

WWG1WGA

348 thoughts on “Dear KMAG: 20190829 Open Topic

  1. The COMMIE WORLD is ganging up on Jair Bolsonaro. PATRIOTS are called to DEFEND OUR ALLIES!

    Liked by 8 people

    1. No big deal, shutting down a Federal agency, threatening officers. Maybe the next violent action will be the one that makes an impact on the court..yes, that surely is it. The big hurt will come………….someday. Carry on cuntifa.

      Liked by 8 people

      1. So, what’s the verdict on HAARP and/or interference in weather?

        Is it possible the Cabal is in some manner enhancing Dorian’s destructive capabilities? Posing a threat to POTUS’ storm

        I’m asking because I don’t recall this intense a reaction from POTUS prior to the last hurricane…………

        again, I admit to becoming more cynical, paranoid – call it what you like – every day.

        Liked by 7 people

        1. The last major hurricane to make landfall in the U.S. at major hurricane status was Hurricane Harvey in August 2017. It struck Texas near Corpus Christi at category 4 strength.

          Liked by 6 people

          1. Harvey did the type of damage more-or-less normal for a Cat 4 in that part of Texas, from wind, sea water rise, and rain.

            Then it moved near Houston, and slowed or stopped in a very unusual way. It stalled there for a couple of days, with much of the Houston area on the rainy side of the storm. Wind and sea water damage were minimal in most of the area, but flooding due to rain was enormous, and very destructive.

            So it was a storm with a very unusual movement pattern, that was thus more costly in proportion to its size and initial Lower 48 landfall location than expected.

            This is a data point to examine if, in fact, the CIA and/or China do have the rumored secret weather control technology.

            Liked by 3 people

        2. The Cabal are technology pikers. They are NOT capable of weather war. On the other hand, if somebody wanted them to win, and understood our weather in ways we can’t yet….

          Well, do the math.

          Too many hurricanes, and something expensive like a Space Force becomes as unnecessary as Space Command was (or seemed to be) after 9/11.

          Lot of things making sense now.

          Reading the history of American Indians as extensively as I did, is paying off BIGLY.

          Liked by 8 people

          1. Treaties are important because they round up the savages on an invisible reservation. They are a tool of deception and control for the dishonorable. Treaties are only as good as the word of the people who make them, and the word of those who hold them later.

            Liked by 8 people

              1. OMG – I did not know that, but it makes so much sense.

                The Germans were intensely studying American Indians after WWI – all aspects. It is not certain whether they were aware of the Choctaw code talkers used in the last days of WWI, but it is very likely, because there were many German scholars studying the Choctaw, and other Eastern tribes, during the 20’s and 30’s.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choctaw_code_talkers

                One of the reasons that the Navajo were chosen for WWII was because there was no documented German spying around them. The Germans seemed not to have known much about them, and thus there was little chance that any intelligence regarding them would get to the Japanese.

                Thus, it’s likely that the Germans learned a lot about the American Indians, including the treaties.

                Liked by 3 people

              2. The Left in the U.K. and the U.S. have a lot to answer for in history. Uncle Karl sitting in a library in England never had to give account for the destruction his ideas would bring upon the world.

                Liked by 1 person

            1. Wolf,

              Other factors to choose Navaho:

              -One of the largest remaining Native American languages, in terms of number of native speakers.

              -Navajo and other Dené languages (e.g. Apache) are Athapascan in origin, like those of many coastal tribes in the Pacific Northwest, British Columbia, and southern Alaska. In other words, the Dené are a Third Wave people, whose ancestors crossed Beringia during the last glaciation, unlike the Amerindians (First Wave) and Inuits/Aleuts (Second Wave.)

              This means their language is completely unrelated to Choctaw, Cherokee, and the other eastern tribes, who are 100% First Wavers. The relationships and Wave theory weren’t worked out until after WWII, but the raw empirical fact that the languages were unrelated was probably known.

              -Some languages (e.g. English, Spanish, Russian, Japanese, Hindi, Indonesian) tend to borrow words from other languages to express unfamiliar concepts they don’t have existing words for.

              Others (e.g. German, or, as an extreme example, Chinese) tend to invent their own words, borrowing the concept, but not the morphemes, or even the metaphor.) For example, the Chinese term for ‘motion picture’ not only doesn’t sound like any Western term meaning that, (unborrowed morphemes) but means, word-for-word, ‘electric shadows’ (unborrowed metaphor.)

              Navajo, like Chinese, to which it is thought by some to be distantly related, is an extreme non-borrowing language. For example, there is a native Navajo word for ‘carburetor’ which is not related to the English or Spanish for ‘carburetor’. 100% native vocabulary would be a tricky obstacle for a hypothetical Japanese linguist to overcome.

              -Navaho has, like ancient Latin, (to which it is not related) a grammar based on a complicated system of suffixes and other inflections that are tricky for non-natives to master. And the pronunciation system is extremely ‘crisp’, which is necessary for making sure the suffixes and so forth can be heard properly. So when native speakers rate the speaking skills of non-natives, they invariably say the non-natives sound ‘mushy’. In particular, no white person has ever mastered the Navajo language well enough to be mistaken for a native tribesmember who was raised with it.

              So the chance our poor hypothetical Japanese linguist would have been able to trick the United States Marine Corps with fake orders was zero. “So sorry. Me no rikey your code ranguage.”

              Liked by 1 person

        3. Liked by 5 people

      2. As the Sun goes into a prolonged minimum I expect the weather to get a lot stormier.

        Dr. Landscheidt, several years ago in looking at solar cycles…

        Abstract:
        Analysis of the sun’s activity in the last two millennia indicates a long period of cool climate , -coldest phase around 2030 is expected. The minima in the Gleissberg cycle , coinciding with cool climate on Earth, is linked to 83-yr cycles in the change of the rotary force driving the sun’s oscillatory motion about the centre of mass of the solar system. As the future course can be computed, the Gleissberg minimum around 2030 and another one around 2200 will be of the Maunder minimum type accompanied by severe cooling on Earth. Other long-range forecasts, based on cycles in the sun’s orbital motion, have turned out correct for instance the last three El Niños years before the event.

        *http://www.schulphysik.de/klima/landscheidt/iceage.htm

        Others have also predicted a Maunder type Solar Minimum. I already mentioned Dr Evans
        *http://sciencespeak.com/climate-nd-solar.html

        Dr Abdussamatov, head of the Pulkovo Observatory predicts the start of The Next Grand Minimum in 2014
        *https://nextgrandminimum.com/tag/pulkovo-observatory/

        2013 Lockwood sees elevated chance of a Maunder-like minimum

        …solar scientist, Prof. Michael Lockwood of the University of Reading, has pointed out that solar activity since the end of the last century has diminished more strongly than it ever has in all the earlier times of the last 9000 years. Lockwood found 24 solar minimum in the last 9000 years, and nowhere did solar activity drop so strongly as it has in the current period. He now sees the probability of another Maunder Minimums at 25- 30%. Just a few years ago he said the probability of a Maunder Minimum re-occurring was 8%….
        *http://notrickszone.com/2013/11/11/german-scientists-solar-cycle-24-points-to-dalton-or-maunder-like-minimum-boding-ill-for-a-climate-cooling/

        Dr. Solanki of the Max Planck Institute beat Lockwood to the punch by a decade in a letter to nature:”According to our reconstruction, the level of solar activity during the past 70 years is exceptional, and the previous period of equally high activity occurred more than 8,000 years ago”

        Unusual activity of the Sun during recent decades compared to the previous 11,000 years
        *http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v431/n7012/abs/nature02995.html
        >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
        SO WHAT TYPE OF WEATHER DO WE GET IN A GRAND SOLAR MINIMUM?

        STORMY!!

        Papers detailing the little ice age:

        The enhanced thermal gradient between latitudes about 50° and 60–65°N in this part of the world is thought to have provided a basis for the development of some greater wind storms in these latitudes than have occurred in most of the last 100 years, though there are signs that in about the last decade or two storminess has been increasing again.”

        http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-015-7692-5_34

        Detailed look at storms here in Europe.
        Google Book: Little Ice Age Storms by Lamb

        The onset of the Little Ice Age (around 1350 AD), however, shows an intensified bottom current circulation most probably due to amplifying westerly winds and a decrease in water temperatures in connection with more frequent advances of higher saline Atlantic waters. The Little Ice Age can be divided into 3 phases: a stormy “zonal” onset, a calm “meridional” maximum and a stormy “zonal” end. The stormy phases are characterized by a sedimentation mode similar to that of recent winter conditions while the Little Ice Age Maximum shows conditions comparable to exceptional cold modern winters.”

        *http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/003101829500114X

        Although our data may not be statistically accurate, an increasing level of storm surge elevations over the recent Holocene is observed with a particular maximum during the Little Ice Age.

        *http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0025322795000613

        Violent storms caused massive flooding and loss of life. … seen in opening the bodies of those who had died in the beginning of the attack), when the pulse is always frequent, small, and occasionally …However, the wide variability of the Little Ice Age continued for at least 150 years …

        http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627969/pdf/10653562.pdf

        Since the SLP during the LMM winter was significantly higher in northeastern Europe but below normal over the central and western Mediterranean, more frequent blocking situations were connected with cold air outbreaks towards central and eastern Europe. Springs were cold and characterized by a southward shift of the mid-latitude storm tracks. Summers in western, central Europe and northern Europe were wetter and slightly cooler than they are today due to a weaker Azores high and a more southerly position of the mean polar front axes. Autumns showed a significantly higher pressure over northern Europe and a lower pressure over continental Europe and the Mediterranean…..

        http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1010667524422

        Instrumental and documentary records of storminess along the Atlantic coast of western Europe show that storm activity exhibits strong spatial and temporal variability at annual and decadal scales. There is evidence of periods of increased storminess during the Little Ice Age (LIA) (AD 1570–1990), and archival records show that these periods are also associated with sand movement in coastal areas.

        http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618208000190

        Significant transgressive dune accretion at 2.2 and 1.5 ka, implies abundant sand supply and strong onshore winds The most recent dune-building period dates to AD1770-1905 and coincides with a predominantly negative winter North Atlantic Oscillation index (NAOi).”

        http://hol.sagepub.com/content/16/3/341.short

        >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
        I have a similar list of Little Ice Age studies for other parts of the globe.

        >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

        The Last Glacial Inception…..

        Neuman and Hearty (1996) may have nailed it:

        Rapid changes in sea level and associated destabilization of climate at the turbulent close of the last interglacial maximum appear to be recorded directly in the geomorphology, stratigraphy, and sedimentary structures of carbonate platform islands in the Bahamas. Considered together, the observations presented here suggest a rapid rise, short crest, and rapid fall of sea level at the close of 5e.

        The lesson from the last interglacial “greenhouse” in the Bahamas is that the closing of that interval brought sea-level changes that were rapid and extreme. This has prompted the remark that between the greenhouse and the icehouse lies a climatic “madhouse”!

        http://www.researchgate.net/publication/249518169_Rapid_sea-level_changes_at_the_close_of_the_last_interglacial_(substage_5e)_recorded_in_Bahamian_island_geology/file/9c96051c6e66749912.pdf

        Liked by 8 people

        1. What I find fascinating is that the climate change disinformation seemed designed to take advantage of the new Maunder-type minimum, yet – if we had not “caught” the AGW scam – we would be trying vainly to solve the OPPOSITE PROBLEM.

          That’s some pretty mind-blowing sabotage of human civilization, utterly taking advantage of good-natured, well-intended human social psychology.

          Liked by 5 people

          1. Wolfie, that is what I find so chilling. If they were aware of a possible new Ice age they would scramble to SAVE plant and animal DNA (done) CLONE and modify animals (done) and severely ‘Prune’ the world’s human population — ACTIVELY PURSUING.

            ~ 1970 it became clear a major change occurred in the thinking of the elite. Before that they were content to strip a % of the wealth from the USA but ~ 1970, it was like a switch got turned. I propose that switch was the knowledge of PROOF the Milankovitch cycles existed and the possible end of the Holocene. At that point they ACTIVELY started to ‘re-arrange’ the world.

            “They” have known since 1968. They being David Rockefeller and Maurice Strong, two of the powers behind the thrones of the world.

            In 1968 Mikhail Budyko came up with two mathematical models, one predicted an Ice Age, the other Global warming from the Greenhouse Effect. In 1970, Broecker using new radioactive decay dating methods (oxygen isotopes) identified and dated five full ice age cycles in 1970. He stated his work was in agreement with Milankovitch. In 1971 Gleissberg published “The Probable Behaviour of Sunspot Cycle 21” and “Revision of the probability laws of sunspot variations” in 1973. This was VERY important because it predicted the ‘Global Warming’ from 1970 to present.

            Nigel Calder a physicist turned TV personality talked of the beginning of the awareness of possible Glaciation:

            ….Kukla found too many layers of loess. Until then, almost everyone thought that there were just four recent glacial ages, with long interglacials between them. An exception was Cesare Emiliani, who in Chicago in 1955 had traced major variations in heavy oxygen in seabed fossils, and counted seven ice ages. Very few experts believed him until Kukla reported at least nine loess layers in the brickyards of Czechoslovakia….
            Those who rewrite the history of climate science to suit the man-made global warming hypothesis hate to be reminded that global cooling and the threat of a new ice age rang alarm bells in the 1960s and 1970s….
            No, we didn’t make it up. I was present in Rome in 1961 when global cooling was already the main concern at a conference of the World Meteorological Organization and Unesco (see the Unesco reference). The discussions were led by Hubert Lamb of the UK Met Office, who went on to found the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia.

            A persistent concern of Lamb and others was that the world might return to a Little Ice Age like that of 300 years ago. But the improving knowledge of glacial history, and especially the apparent brevity of warm interglacials, prompted anxiety about a full-blown ice age. George Kukla, together with Robert Matthews of Brown University, convened a conference in 1972 entitled “The Present Interglacial: How and When will it End?”…
            Kukla and Matthews alerted President Richard Nixon, and as a result the US Administration set up a Panel on the Present Interglacial involving the State Department and other agencies….
            https://calderup.wordpress.com/2010/05/14/next-ice-age/

            Ice Ages Confirmed goes through the history of the scientific discoveries starting in 1911 with an Yugoslavian professor of mathematics, Milutin Milankovitch, in to the discovers of the 60s and 70s through the Hays, Imbrie, and Shackleton article, which appeared on December 10, 1976 in Science titled: “Variations in the Earth’s Orbit: Pacemaker of the Ice Ages.” giving concrete confirmation of Milankovitch’s mathematical theory, first published about 1920.

            In 1970 Maurice Strong lead the UN Conference on the Human Environment and became Executive director environment program of the United Nations from 1971 to 1975, and he chaired the 1972 Montreal Protocols reducing Chlorofluorocarbons. He sought to blame increased UV radiation on “holes in the ozone” due to CFCs, not due to increased sun spot activity. *http://isgp.eu/organisations/introduction/PEHI_Maurice_F_Strong_bio.htm

            In 1975 Veerabhadran Ramanathan pointed out that human-made chlorofluorocarbons (or CFCs) are particularly potent greenhouse gases, with as much as 200 times the heat-retaining capacity of carbon dioxide.” *http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GISSTemperature/giss_temperature2.php

            We had the ‘trial run’ for the Paris Accord when they banned CFCs. Only the election of President Trump prevented the gradual removal of a reliable energy source from the ‘serfs’ ===> Major reduction in the human population.

            Liked by 4 people

  2. One weasel walks (for now), another one is back in the hot seat:

    Liked by 13 people

  3. I’ve left this is the Daugh’s Comey thread, but want to make sure everyone sees it:

    ladypenquin
    August 29, 2019 at 20:19
    Keep the faith:

    ristvan says:
    August 29, 2019 at 2:55 pm
    (Referencing SD’s post on how the Cabal would have sprung the trap of we couldn’t tell the President, he was a potential bad guy.)
    https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/08/29/hubris-as-a-strategy/comment-page-1/#comments
    “Sundance nails it again”
    “See my just posted comment on the next thread concerning the IG Comey memo report. To have indicted Comey over the memos would have sprung the Dem outrage trap shut. The soon forthcoming FISA abuse report is what will nail Comey. Nunes has already made separate criminal referrals concerning FISA abuse. Comey’s tweets today will look very bad in a couple of months.”

    ristvan says:
    August 29, 2019 at 2:46 pm

    “Have now read report and two threads of comments. Bottom line, this Lurking Lawyer agrees with the decision not to prosecute Comey on the leaked memos. There are two basic reasons:
    1. Comey insulated himself from direct leaking charges by giving his friend special FBI access. The friend leaked, not Comey.
    2. What was leaked wasn’t classified, and what was classified wasn’t leaked. So 18USC§798 is not in play.

    You don’t prosecute for breach of FBI policy and employment agreement. You fire, as PDJT did. An indictment on shaky grounds enables the ‘abuse of power, political retribution’ argument best avoided at present if you want to indict, convict, and send to prison Spygate perps to insure ‘Never Again’!

    The IG report AG Barr has repeatedly referred to as important is the FISA abuse, coming mid September to Early October. There will be IG criminal referrals since Nunes has already separately made some. They will result, IMO, in indictments and then convictions of at least Comey and Yates for at least major felony 18USC§1018, false attestation, based on what we already know is irrefutable Spygate evidence. As Barr said to Congress, “We know there was spying on the Trump Campaign. The question is whether it was adequately predicated.” The IG will conclude it wasn’t.”

    Liked by 14 people

      1. Yes, I do. He mentioned his caring for an invalid wife, after having had to care for his mother at OT. He has a lot on him, but I hope he knows that people are concerned.

        Like

  4. The President is warning that the hurricane will be “bigger or at least as big as Andrew.”

    After a week of headlines involving “nuking hurricanes,” which was obvious code for something else, I’m half-wondering if this is a veiled reference to Andrew Jackson.

    Liked by 8 people

    1. I learned earlier this week that the Rose Garden we see now was the result of a complete re-design by the JFK Administration. I’ve wondered ever since if the President uses it as a veiled JFK reference. Kind of like in this video where he puts special emphasis on being in the Rose Garden.

      Liked by 7 people

  5. – Nuking hurricanes
    – Establishing Space Command
    – “Bigger than Andrew”
    – VP conveniently out of the country

    It just feels like there’s something much much more to all of this than a weather event.

    Liked by 11 people

    1. My gut feeling exactly…………………….

      Great pickup on “Andrew” Jackson Ms Sadie !

      Ohh, and there’s Paul Ryan moving to Virginia ……………..

      Wonder if there have been recent attempts on his life that we don’t know about…

      Liked by 5 people

  6. “Now, there’s a high likelihood that Hurricane Dorian will continue this major hurricane landfall streak for a third straight year. That hasn’t happened in the U.S. since 1959-61 – nearly 60 years ago…

    On Sept. 11, 1961, Hurricane Carla was the third and final major hurricane landfall of this streak. It made landfall near Port O’Connor, Texas, as a Category 4 hurricane.

    No hurricanes made a U.S. landfall in 1962.”

    You know who was President at the time?

    JFK.

    WE HAVEN’T HAD A THREE-YEAR MAJOR HURRICANE STREAK SINCE JFK.

    What are the odds of that?

    Liked by 5 people

    1. Yup. Interesting. And we’re really talking LAST TWO YEARS OF IKE (plan originator) – NIXON RUNNING TO GET IN.

      And then after CIA burns JFK on Cuba (read Corso), .mil wises him up and he gets killed.

      Oh, this is all making sense. Trump is getting what IKE got.

      Liked by 4 people

    2. Actually pretty good.

      In 2015 Hurricanes were at a record low.

      Graph from Tony Heller 10/15/2015 US Hurricanes And Tornadoes At A Record Low

      Tony was very good friends with Top Hurricane Expert Dr Gray.
      https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/?s=gray

      NOTE where the peak was — in the 1880’s Since then we have had a “Modern grand maximum” which has just ended.

      So what happened around the mid 1800s? Solar Cycle 8. It began in November 1833 with a smoothed sunspot number of 7.3 and ended in July 1843. Max sunspot number ~210. The prior Solar Cycle 7, began in May 1823 with a smoothed sunspot number of 0.1 and ended in November 1833. Max sunspot number ~105. And thus began the return to a normal solar cycle and escalating to a Grand Solar Maximum, highest in 3,000 years which has just ended.

      In the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics, Usoskin et al. “present the first fully adjustment-free physical reconstruction of solar activity” covering the past 3,000 years, which record allowed them “to study different modes of solar activity at an unprecedented level of detail.” Their reconstruction of solar activity displays several “distinct features,” including several “well-defined Grand minima of solar activity, ca. 770 BC, 350 BC, 680 AD, 1050 AD, 1310 AD, 1470 AD, and 1680 AD,” as well as “the modern Grand maximum (which occurred during solar cycles 19-23, i.e., 1950-2009),” described as “a rare or even unique event, in both magnitude and duration, in the past three millennia.” http://www.co2science.org/articles/V17/N32/C1.php

      From A History of Solar Activity over Millennia — Usoskin et al.

      ….It is equally dangerous to evaluate other solar/heliospheric/terrestrial indices from sunspot numbers, by extrapolating an empirical relation obtained for the last few decades back in time. This is because the last decades (after the 1950s), which are well covered by direct observations of solar, terrestrial and heliospheric parameters, correspond to a very high level of solar activity. After a steep rise in [solar] activity level between the late 19th and mid 20th centuries, the activity remained at a roughly constant high level, being totally dominated by the 11-year cycle without a long-term trends…..

      The end of the Modern grand maximum of activity and the current low level of activity, characterized by the highest ever observed cosmic ray flux as recorded by ground-based neutron monitors, the very low level of the HMF and geomagnetic activity, should help to verify the connections between solar activity, cosmic ray fluxes, geomagnetic activity, the heliospheric magnetic field, and open field. Since some of these connections are somewhat controversial, these extreme conditions should help to quantify them better….

      You will get a delay in response between the changes in the Sun and the climate on earth. See: Notch-Delay Solar Theory

      Liked by 4 people

  7. Liked by 10 people

    1. This is one of the many problems with the people on twitter…………. they’re so ignorant.

      No knowledge of civics, history…. you name it. No manners either.

      [end of “GET OFF MY LAWN” rant]

      Liked by 5 people

    1. Twins, PR!! 👯 Was just coming to drop the same.

      Liked by 7 people

      1. Yes Butterfly ! Twins………….

        and she’s NOT the brightest bulb in the box, is she ? Glad she’s gone. Wonder how much damage she has done?

        Liked by 7 people

    2. She worked on Mitt’s 2012 campaign.

      The NYT has a good article. Of note:

      ‘Ms. Westerhout, a former Republican National Committee aide who also worked for Mitt Romney’s 2012 presidential campaign, reportedly cried on election night because she was upset over Mr. Trump’s victory. As such, the president at first viewed her warily, as a late convert to his cause who could not be trusted.

      ‘But some of Mr. Trump’s top officials — like John F. Kelly, who has since left as chief of staff — tried to turn Ms. Westerhout into an ally who could help them manage Oval Office traffic. They hoped that she could block individuals from reaching the president on the phone or in person, and that she would report back on the calls and meetings that made it through.’

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s