Dear KMAG: 20190802 Open Topic

This HOT AUGUST [02] [PLACEHOLDER] FRIDAY open thread is VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA / KAG! / KMAG world (KMAG being a bit of both MAGA and KAG!).

Don’t mind if we do a little escape act here….

You can say what you want, comment on what other people said, and so on.

Free Speech is practiced here. ENJOY IT. Use it or lose it.

Keep it SOMEWHAT civil. They tried to FORCE fake Orwellian civility on us. In response, we CHOOSE true civility to defend our precious FREEDOM from THEM.

Our rules began with the civility of the Old Treehouse, later to become the Wolverinian Empire, and one might say that we have RESTORED THE OLD REPUBLIC – the early high-interaction model of the Treehouse – except of course that Q discussion is not only allowed but encouraged, and speech is considerably freer in other ways. Please feel free to argue and disagree with the board owner, as nicely as possible.

Please also consider the Important Guidelines, outlined here in the January 1st open thread. Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven.






Our movement

Is about replacing

A failed


Political establishment

With a new government controlled

By you, the American People.

Candidate Donald J. Trump

Also remember Wheatie’s Rules:

  1. No food fights.
  2. No running with scissors.
  3. If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.

Let’s see if we can tell this story in James Coburn pictures. You ready?

Here we go!

August is going to be an interesting month.

Oh yeah? Just HOW interesting, we might ask.

Well, based on the LEAD-UP, I’d say we’re gonna see some enemy action.

Actors Henry Fonda and James Coburn on the set of Universal Studios movie ” Midway” in 1976. (Photo by Michael Ochs Archives/Getty Images)

OK. Should we be worried?

HA! You’re kidding – right?

Nope. We are gonna WIN this sucker.

Nevertheless, we have to be careful.

We have to be smart.

We have to be cool.

We definitely have to be wary.

Some of us may have to be a bit stealthy.

Some of us may simply be on vacation.

Others may not simply be on vacation.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is jamescoburncafescene.jpg

We have to stay strong….

But we also have to have some fun!

Now in the periodic, random, unpredictable, and unexplained absences of GROWLING, SNARLING WOLVES….

There may be what seem like explosive situations….

However, we believe that higher powers….


Are all we need to WIN and WIN BIG in this GIFT of a lovingly designed universe.

So stick around for a GOOD TIME.


Maybe have some POPCORN!

I mean – who KNOWS how much winning there will be?

We are gonna have ONE HECK OF A GOOD TIME!


Where We Go One, We Go All.



505 thoughts on “Dear KMAG: 20190802 Open Topic

      1. I can’t believe he’s doing that. Doesn’t he get that ANYONE POTUS nominates who is any good is going to get that same treatment? Sometimes you just have to suck it up and do what’s right, no matter what the mob decides to do. Like Kavanaugh did. But no, he’s going to go cower in the corner like all the RINOs do.

        Liked by 8 people

        1. Sickening, sickening, sickening.
          President is supposed to get his chosen nominees.
          He needs counsel from those whom he trusts.

          Sue Gordon – when Comey, Brennan, Rosenstein, and the press, all love her – I don’t.

          Liked by 3 people

        2. Except for Ratcliffe being a RINO, I agree…

          …unless they just found out something about Ratcliffe they didn’t know before…

          …or unless this was scripted in advance to make bad guys waste air time, bandwidth, and ammo denouncing Ratcliffe, before the real nominee is announced.

          Liked by 7 people

  1. President Trump just announced a major EU trade policy on U.S. beef exports to Europe.

    A.O.C. immediately decried this expansion of beef exports when she heard there would be many more Beef Hearts consumed. She is totally against Beef Hearts as they cause Global Warming. She would like to ban all Beef Hearts. /s 🙂

    Liked by 7 people

          1. … oh … okay … I felt a bit bad about it, I just don’t like her is all … she a hazmet irritant … ewwwww ..
            I’d like to see banished to the cone of silence ….

            Thanks andy you’re a sweetheart .. 🙂🤚❤️‼️

            Liked by 4 people

    1. You can also always go to

      and hit the rectangular blue on back POTUS: on button at the top. If you don’t see it, hit the menu button on the page, at the top.

      The advantages this way are that it’s not immediately dependant on @jackboot and his Fascist organization, and also that you see all the Q drops that day interspersed with the Trump tweets, in chronological order, with timestamps for both down to the second.

      So you can determine the deltas for yourself by eyeball, rather than rely on someone else.

      For example, you can look at presidential tweets and Q drops yesterday, and see that the 4 China tweets that crashed the market yesterday together constituted a Q proof, as they were all stamped exactly 3’33” (half of 666?) after a Q drop that said “C before D, Coats before Declas, The month of AUGUST is traditionally very HOT.,…”

      Or you can search for msgs from Feb 17 this year, and count that there were 12 tweets and 17 Q drops. (17 drops on the 17th day of the 17th month of Q drops, ‘q’ being the 17th letter of the alphabet. What are the odds?)

      You will quickly find a presidential tweet from the 1st half of a particular minute on Feb 17, and see that it followed a Q drop from the 2nd half of the previous minute. And that there were 2 tweets earlier that day, each of which was from the same hour and minute as a respective Q drop. So there were 12 Trump tweets that Sunday, and 25% of them were within one minute of an earlier Q drop. What are the odds?

      Liked by 7 people

  2. Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, President Donald Trump’s pick to be the new director of national intelligence, will remain in Congress and not be nominated for the post, the commander-in-chief announced Friday.

    “Rather than going through months of slander and libel, I explained to John how miserable it would be for him and his family to deal with these people,” Trump tweeted Friday afternoon.

    ….John has therefore decided to stay in Congress where he has done such an outstanding job representing the people of Texas, and our Country. I will be announcing my nomination for DNI shortly.

    — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 2, 2019

    “John has therefore decided to stay in Congress where he has done such an outstanding job representing the people of Texas, and our Country,” he added.

    Liked by 8 people

    1. I assume Coats is still leaving on August 15th and an acting director will be put in place, or the assistant director will take over? I have no doubt Pres. Trump has got this. He likes to use acting directors to accomplish his goals, too.

      Liked by 14 people

        1. Yeah, something is up with this. Trump didn’t just “explain” to Ratcliffe how tough this was going to be; do people really think Ratcliffe didn’t know? What, he was in a coma during the Kavanaugh debacle?

          No, there is more here than meets the eye. I’m sure Ratcliffe has been through enough elections to have had the full proctological exam, so it isn’t Dem dirt. I just don’t know what it IS.

          Liked by 1 person

    2. The wording sounds almost as though POTUS wanted him to withdraw…or, maybe internal polling indicated a tough road and POTUS wanted to spare him.

      Liked by 10 people

  3. Yesterday during the helicopter presser, one of the reporters asked the President about a felony that Ratcliffe supposedly had. Wonder if this is why the withdrawal has occurred.
    On another note, wondering if anyone else has the problem of being unable to read the reply chains as they get reduced to one letter per line? I read this site on my phone and turn it sidewise and still have this problem. Can something be corrected as I don’t have the same problem when I go to CTH? Thanks.

    Liked by 6 people

    1. I long since gave up trying to do any meaningful browsing of the internet over a mobile phone. My e-mailer doesn’t work worth a damn on mobile either.

      The fix would probably be to allow one less level of replies, but that would aggravate a lot of people here…or possibly find a different page style that doesn’t indent quite as much. (It’s frustrating because a lot of white space is left that COULD be used (if the person who wrote the code for WordPress had a damned clue) for text.)

      Liked by 10 people

    2. Definitely a progressive/leftist site here – haven’t found anything about any felonies on Ratcliffe’s part.

      “If the deeply concerned intelligence officials don’t manage to kill his nomination and if the Senate approves Ratcliffe to run the nation’s 17 intelligence services, then the source of Ignatius’ story has reason to worry. A senior U.S. official might get treated like Julian Assange or Chelsea Manning. Some would see a witch hunt. Others would call it rough justice. That would be a victory for Trump, which is one reason why the Ratcliffe nomination will be resisted by the intelligence community.”

      Liked by 5 people

    1. Okay. That is a Gab post by NeonRevolt highlighting today’s article in The Hill about Dems using Rule 6(e) to obtain confidential grand jury materials, and that Q predicted it:

      Q 3507, from 7/26, says in part:
      Will members of the D party Congress attempt to amend Rule 6(e) in order to obtain grand jury material deemed ‘critically important’?
      Logical thinking, why?
      Why paint a narrative that the one item you cannot possess is the one item you need in order to justify your argument?
      People elected ‘knowingly’ spreading false-information [disinformation]?
      Puppets follow orders.
      Think for yourself.
      It’s not clear to me whether the Dems are trying to use the rule or amend it (or just threaten to), but at any rate, Q mentioned it before it happened.

      Liked by 10 people

      1. I think Q’s point on 7/26 was that:

        — the Dims in Congress would keep demanding publicly that Barr release the 7 and a half lines of 6e redacted material they haven’t seen yet from the 440+ page Mueller report, on the theory that those are exactly the 7 and a half lines that magically prove “Muh Russia”,

        — even though there is much more material in the report redacted for other reasons that they didn’t bother to go see, when Barr put the partially unredacted report in a SCIF for them,

        — that they, being LAWMAKERS, would, nevertheless, NOT try to change the Grand Jury rule 6(e) LAW, earlier made by CONGRESS, that makes it a FELONY for Barr to give them the 7 and a half lines of 6e material they keep so loudly squawking about.

        Liked by 2 people

  4. This is absolute BS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Liked by 9 people

    1. Liked by 6 people

    2. SD has a post up that offers some excellent insight…

      Btw……WTF is Rosenstein doing interjecting himself in this issue?? This is a TELL.

      Liked by 7 people

        1. To me, it makes perfect sense. The SSCI.

          F’n scumbags!!

          I ask again….what is Rosenstein doing interjecting himself in a matter that has NOTHING to do with him???

          Liked by 10 people

          1. Spidey sense is pegged to the red line.
            No reason whatsoever to have him speak up now.
            And Brennan and Comey, loving all over Dan Coats — yuck.
            And Warner pushing Sue, whatshername.
            I would take my neighbor over her at this point.

            Liked by 12 people

            1. Purely for informational purposes, what do the worms at Lawfare Blog say?


              NOTE the distinction made between the acting AG (formerly Matt Whitaker prior to Barr and the DNI)…

              ….this is how these worms operate…


              “Taken literally, this would seem to override the discretion that the president otherwise would have enjoyed under the FVRA, compelling the conclusion instead that the current “principal deputy director” (Sue Gordon, a widely respected career official who has held this position since 2017) “shall” serve as the acting DNI for so long as necessary. (Matthew Whitaker presented a superficially similar situation when he was appointed as acting attorney general, but the Justice Department-specific statute in that case contains the word “may” rather than “shall.”)”

              Clearly the worms want Sue Gordon.

              Which also tells is, along with the hyperventilating from Brennan et al, that Dan Coates was/is a “black hat”.

              Liked by 7 people

              1. ‘Which also tells… that Dan Coates was/is a “black hat”.’

                Yes, I think that is likely…

                –unless Coats is, at best, a non-entity/grey hat, afraid to damage institutional reputation and/or rock the boat, who could be prevailed upon by the black hats not to go for a big, first-class Declas.

                –or unless a sting is in progress, and Coats is an undercover white hat, with the confidence of the black hats, and we will find out more later.

                Sorry to be so indecisive! Complicated business, folks!!


      1. ristvan says:
        August 2, 2019 at 3:36 pm

        Lurking Lawyer here.

        Will I do not disagree with the SSCI dynamic Sundance documents, I think the Ratcliffe ‘withdrawal’ before formal PDJT nomination is simpler to understand.

        Dems criticisms of Ratcliffe were 2: qualifications and partisanship. Ratcliffe may have been able to overcome the latter, but IMO not the former.

        DNI and ODNI were an outcome of the 911 Commission report on siloed Intelligence failures. It was legislated by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, now formally 50USC§403 et seq.

        Paraphrasing in part, §403(a) says there shall be a cabinet level DNI, (a) (1) appointed by President and confirmed by Senate, and further, “Any individual nominated for appointment as DNI SHALL HAVE extensive national security experience”.

        The problem is that Ratcliffe doesn’t meet the §403(a)(1) express requirement. US Attorney is not ‘extensive national security expedience’.

        Liked by 10 people

          1. Agree

            Moreover, POTUS isn’t stupid. He would not nominate someone unqualified for the position.

            I disagree with Rivstan on that point.

            Liked by 9 people

            1. “Extensive” is the subjective word. Good God, I qualify and so do YOU.
              I nominate FG&C for the slot!!!!!!!!
              That would make me happy.
              And we would ALL rest easy.

              Liked by 8 people

              1. Me? DNI?

                My very first act, the moment I finished taking the oath of office, would be to install the Wolf as my #1.

                Liked by 7 people

            2. …. 😫🤚 …. 🤬‼️‼️‼️‼️

              Me too … nuts and .. harrumph ‼️

              I do not like them ..

              I do not like them in a box.
              I do not like them with a fox.
              I do not like them in a house.
              I do not like them with a mouse.
              I do not like them here or there.
              I do not like them anywhere … ‼️‼️‼️

              H/T to Green Eggs and Ham .. 😛

              Liked by 3 people

              1. My hope is that Q isn’t exaggerating about it being a HOT AUGUST.

                HOT enough specifically to light a fire under those treasonous toads in Corruption Junction, AKA the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.

                Liked by 2 people

  5. Holy cow! What a way to fish!!!

    “The video showed the boat applying the “shocking” current, causing a fizzing sensation in the water as hundreds of carp jump out of the lake while the three fishermen on board scoop up some of the fish.

    The agency launched the program to solve the problem of Asian carp overpopulation. The carp is an invasive species which catfish farmers introduced to the U.S. during the 1970s.

    The fish are invasive because they breed at an extremely high rate— a mature female Asian carp produces 1 million eggs per year— and the overpopulation of these fish mean there is less food to go around for other fish in the sea.

    The electrical current is not meant to kill the fish but intended to stun the fish long enough so they can be captured or counted.

    “It’s just to give folks an idea of how many fish we’re dealing with below the dam. We collect and try to distribute to them to buyers,” Ron Brooks, the department’s fisheries division director, told CNN.

    Once the fish are collected, counted, and measured, they are harvested to buyers who make products such as fertilizer, food products meant for humans, and fish bait.”

    Liked by 7 people

    1. It seems to me a better way to scoop up more of those fish would be to have two boats about 20 feet or so apart each dragging one end of a wide net while they zap the water. They could probably net thousands of the fish in one pass that way.

      Liked by 11 people

    2. Not sure what’s happening here.

      Guy sitting down is ducking fish as they jump into the boat. Net guy on the right side of screen seems like he might be scooping some fish and tossing them into the boat. Net guy on the left side is definitely not netting any fish to bring them into the boat..

      Now maybe the three in the boat are waiting for the fish to grow still and float before they net, count or measure.


      These guys only want to net the right side fish and not the left side fish at which point I grow concerned 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Nope – I heard it wrong:

        10:29 AM PT — A$AP Rocky was just released from jail while the judges in his Swedish assault case decide his fate. The announcement in court was met with cheer from onlookers. A$AP is free to leave Sweden while they await a verdict, which is expected August 14. The other 2 defendants are also released and free to leave. Prosecutors had asked that Rocky, who’s spent a month in jail, remain there because he was a flight risk, but the judges disagreed. Reading between the lines, the fact that the judges are letting him leave the country may be a sign he won’t be found guilty.

        Liked by 12 people

  6. Pres. Trump secured the release of A$AP Rocky from Sweden. I wonder why he capitalized “Rocky Week.”

    Liked by 9 people

    1. Just making a play on words – dude’s name is Rocky hence Rocky week. Getting A$AP home ASAP – more play on works from the guy’s name.

      Liked by 8 people

  7. Because the third time is a charm….

    Liked by 7 people

    1. A lot of effort for a guy who talks shit about PTrump. Wrote a “song” about Trump that basically said in true retarded street bullshit slang that his niggas would shoot him.
      PTrump is a lot more generous than I’d be

      Liked by 6 people

  8. President just said he “Like Sue Gordon” and “She’s there now – I like her”
    Press likes Sue Gordon

    I think I’m gonna throw up.

    Liked by 12 people

      1. Feel like Linda Blair in the Exorcist – head spinning around, ready to puke green stuff.
        Bring me a PRIEST to cast those demons out of the SSCI.

        President needs to talk to Melania this weekend in Bedminster. She knows better.

        Liked by 8 people

      2. Maybe it has something to do what Q said in: Post 3536

        Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: fce708 No.7243859

        Jul 29 2019 12:11:56 (EST)

        Thank you for confirming….
        Coats BAD
        Ratcliffe GOOD
        Sleepers present problems re: staff fills.
        More coming?

        He also talked about the SCARAMUCCI MODEL.

        Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 8442b9 No.7234526

        Jul 28 2019 18:53:47 (EST)
        The SWAMP runs deep.
        DNC server(s) hold many answers.
        DNI & NSA
        House of Cards.
        You didn’t think the plea deal was the end did you?

        Liked by 11 people

        1. “OMG, that’s her??????????”


          No kidding.

          Probably wearing a pair of flip-flops with a Che Gueverra silhouette on the back of her T-shirt.

          She couldn’t scream “I’m a Granola!” any louder if she was standing in the middle of San Francisco.

          She presents herself as a combination of Leftist outward symbolic goofiness.

          A) no make up
          B) could pass for a dude
          C) disheveled, unprofessional attire

          Or to put it another way, no one on the planet would mistake Sue Gordon for a Conservative.

          Liked by 10 people

            1. “1 – 18 = -17”


              The incorrect letters in “Gueverra” (from my previous post) are ‘a’ (the second ‘e’ should be an ‘a’) and ‘r’ (there should only be one ‘r’).

              A = 1st letter of the alphabet, R = 18th letter of alphabet

              1 – 18 = -17

              17 is the number for Q

              Q works for the president.

              The president (and now Ivanka) uses intentional misspellings of words as coded messages.

              I’m just following suit. 👍

              It’s easier (or more fun, anyway) than typing “edit / correction: “Probably wearing a pair of flip-flops with a Che Gueverra Guevara silhouette on the back of her T-shirt. 😁

              Liked by 2 people

        2. President Trump is draining the Swamp. He brings them under the spotlight to be exposed for the World to see—next. These things take time—YEARS.

          I think DJT Jr. said in Cincy that we need another 4 years of Trump to continue draining the Swamp. It is a very DEEP Swamp.

          Liked by 8 people

          1. As any CEO knows, we need tangible results, not promises.

            You want a contract extension, let’s see the water level in the swamp drop by at least 30 feet.

            Then we’ll talk.


              1. “Now, putting them behind bars is not directly the President’s “purview”. ”


                Firing the heads of the DOJ and FIB until they are behind bars, is… 😉

                Liked by 2 people

              2. Yes, but you see the average sheep on the street and you could imagine the political fallout of doing so—unfortunately, that would give our opponents LOTS of turnout energy for 2020.

                Not everybody does enough of their homework to see through the BS—not yet anyway…..


  9. Sanders gets second unofficial Ben & Jerry’s flavor

    “”The chocolate disc represents all the wealth that has risen to the top 1 percent” while the “backbone represents Bernie’s steadfast determination to un-rig our economy.” The hot cinnamon flavor is “our political revolution holding politicians’ feet to the fire to make America work for working people of all races and genders.””

    Are you f—ing kidding me?!?

    Ben & Jerry’s is owned by a billion dollar multi-national corporation!

    Liked by 9 people

    1. All the hospitals ask for donations at the grocery stores. They wonder why people dont give. This is not science. Egotism, God complex, torture, and evil done upon these kids.

      Liked by 7 people

      1. I’ve always wondered first about the controls in these donation (accountability), and second, if the grocery stores get a tax deduction as though they are the donors. I’m sure with the hundreds of shoppers giving even a dollar, the amount is quite substantial.

        Liked by 3 people

        1. Thats the thing. YOU give to the store, THEY get the tax write off. UNLESS the store gives you a separate donation receipt. Thats why they sometimes give you coupons or free food etc. I think its more beneficial to get the donation write off.
          I absolutely do not donate to anyone through a 2nd or 3rd party.

          Liked by 5 people

        2. Any time a store clerk asks me at the checkout line if I’d like to contribute a dollar to the “poor, needy children”, I decline and then add, “I hate children”. They usually don’t know whether they should laugh or give me a dirty look. I get both.

          Human psychology can be fun.

          Liked by 6 people

            1. His favorite actor was W. C. Fields, who was asked how he liked children, to which he replied “slow roasted over an open fire.”

              He was actually fond of children (in a good way).

              Liked by 5 people

    2. SIckening and unbelievable! Someone is trying to stop it. Here is one of the comments:

      “This is a true medical experiment on children causing irreversible harm. Thank you for writing about this critically important, but underreported issue. The Kelsey Coalition is a new non-partisan organization whose sole mission is to promote policies and laws that protect young people from medical and psychological harms. We have written to the Office for Human Research Protections on April 5 for an immediate moratorium on this unethical study pending an investigation. They have yet to respond.

      “We have also alerted the US Surgeon General to this matter and are urging him to issue a Call to Action. Please consider signing our petition here:…”

      Liked by 11 people

    3. “Imagine giving eight-year-old girls testosterone. They are in third or fourth grade. This is unbelievable. But this is going on.”

      How is this not child abuse? IMO, these “researchers” should be prosecuted and sent to prison for crimes against humanity.

      Liked by 8 people

  10. Well it’s Wednesday Thursday Friday, I hope everyone is plowing through the declassified documents Joe DiGenova promised we would have!

    I’m enjoying the reading immensely…

    SOON, that is!

    It just never gets old,


    Liked by 6 people

    1. Yeah, I’ve learned to never count on deadlines and predictions. I’m starting to be skeptical now about August DECLAS too, with the changes at ODNI. More “wait and see.” They are going to have to act before too long because of the timeline of the upcoming election.

      Liked by 6 people

      1. “They are going to have to act before too long because of the timeline of the upcoming election.”


        Not a CHANCE!

        Don’t you see, the upcoming election is the perfect excuse to not do anything until AFTER the election.

        For every good reason to DO it, there are a hundred reasons NOT to do it.

        So “don’t do it” always, always ALWAYS wins.

        It’s always easier to do nothing, than it is to do something.

        And it’s infinitely easier to do nothing than it is to smash a hornet’s nest.

        That’s why hornet’s nests grow so large.

        Personally, I like to stand off from the nest at about 20 feet, and then hit it with a flame Thrower. A big, beautiful arc of flaming gasoline, that you can ‘walk in’ to your target, like a Rainbow of Flaming Death converging on a pot of corruption 😁

        Liked by 3 people

            1. “They’re putting smaller versions on drones now. Imagine the possibilities.”


              The first time someone uses a flame thrower on a drone and injures or kills someone, here is the following chain of events:

              A) the crime is used as an excuse to require licenses to fly drones

              B) licenses will be prohibitively expensive and will require liability insurance premiums so high that only commercial entities (and financed terrorists) will be able to justify the cost

              C) licenses will be used to hold drone operators accountable to all the fine print in the license application, to include legal fees, court costs, fines, and if there is anything left over, once all the leeches are paid, a pittance for the victim’s family

              Becoming a reality in 3… 2… 1…

              Liked by 2 people

  11. Ratcliffe pulls out of the nomination, now PDJT has the SCARAMUCCI MODEL set up to fill ……….
    Wasn’t there a Q drop about the Scaramucci model?

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Ratcliffe pulls out of the nomination, now PDJT has the SCARAMUCCI MODEL set up to fill ……….
    Wasn’t there a Q drop about the Scaramucci model?

    Liked by 9 people

    1. Q 3552

      Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 8442b9 No.7234526 📁
      Jul 28 2019 18:53:47 (EST)
      The SWAMP runs deep.
      DNC server(s) hold many answers.
      DNI & NSA
      House of Cards.
      You didn’t think the plea deal was the end did you?

      It wouldn’t surprise me if the Ratcliffe episode was all part of the plan. Q even mentions DNI. I don’t know that Coats would qualify for the Scaramuchi model since he was there for some time.

      Liked by 10 people

  13. So people don’t get discouraged, re: GOP “retirements” – Unseen has reposted his twitter thread from Nov. 2017 regarding GOP changes.

    Liked by 8 people

    1. Liked by 8 people

  14. Has Bill Clinton been arrested?
    A screen shot Kimi seen on Seraphin Arch Angels page shows he was arrested just after Chelsea had her baby, it was just like 3-4 days after.Has anyone else seen anything about this.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Definitely suspicious. And don’t forget that some of the victims in that mass shooting in southern Cal at a bar (can’t remember the name) were also survivors of Las Vegas.

      Liked by 6 people

    2. I’m glad you posted this grandmaintexas…

      What are the odds, indeed. I have a collection of videos I’ve been filing away with this coincidence happening way more than can be considered normal. Survivors of Florida mass shooting surviving another Florida mass shooting…Survivors of Las Vegas surviving Thousand Oaks California mass shooting…the Parkland kids traveling to New Zealand before that mass shooting…and several more.

      The reason I started filing these videos away is because it seems to happen all of the time…and many of the videos and stories I came across I didn’t bother to save at first and are lost to me. I don’t really know what to make of it. Attention seekers? Who knows?

      Liked by 4 people

      1. “I don’t really know what to make of it. Attention seekers? Who knows?”


        It sounds similar to the plot to Final Destination (James Wong, 2000).

        They were supposed to die. When they didn’t, it created an anomaly, and Death had to come for each of them one by one, in order to ‘make things right’ with the ‘universe’… or something. I think I saw it once, a long time ago, but I remember the promotional ‘movie trailers’ for it.

        Synopsis: “After one member of a high school class bound for Paris experiences a terrifying vision, he and a handful of passengers disembark the ill-fated flight, just before it takes off and explodes. Then the survivors begin to die, one by one, in mysterious and increasingly bizarre “accidents.” ”

        Liked by 1 person

    3. “What are the odds?”



      Unless someone was trying to kill off witnesses to the Las Vegas shooting, and needed a convenient cover.

      You all remember the Las Vegas shooting, don’t you?

      The largest shooting in American HISTORY if I understand correctly, whose “investigation” never even CONCLUDED, and for which NO ONE has ever been prosecuted.

      We didn’t even get a fake ‘Warren Commission’ Congressional soap opera out of the deal.

      It was just flushed down the memory hole — nothing to see here, folks!

      Pay not attention to the largest mass-shooting in American history.

      Your eyes are getting very heavy… you feel relaxed and at ease… these are not the droids you’re looking for… go back to sleep…

      Liked by 6 people

        1. 100% don’t dwell on the shootings. Deep state, socialists, anti 2A want the attention. Piss on them, each and every one.

          Yes, the shootings are tragic.

          The guns did nothing wrong.

          Shooter did the killing. Some shooters incited by bad actors. Some shooters are simply nuts.

          Me thinks, the shootings are a society issue.

          Liked by 2 people

          1. Trump is very onto this being a society issue, ultimately. Cultural Marxism has removed the mental safety nets that meant even the most bullied kid “back in the day” would never think of either shooting their tormentor or killing themselves.

            SNOWFLAKE AMERICA did this.

            Liked by 3 people

  15. AOC staff quitting. This has to be the agreement with Pelosi. Betcha shes taken a better cash payout with tia Nancy than the hard core leftists. Lets see who goes into those spots. This is all to shape her for re-election.

    “Two top members of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s team are leaving the lawmaker’s office. 

    Saikat Chakrabarti, 33, her Chief of Staff left on Friday, and Corbin Trent, Director of Communications, is due for a move too.

    Chakrabarti will work for a nonprofit focused on raising awareness of climate change and trying to further the Green New Deal.

    Meanwhile Trent has agreed to work throughout August before transitioning across to her 2020 reelection campaign, according to the Intercept.

    This is the same role he held during her first congressional run in 2018.”

    Liked by 8 people

        1. All for optics? Maybe Chupabara and Trent have other up and coming candidates that need attention or there’s been some massive infusion of $$$ for yet another org to propagandize climate change. After all Google Camp will need platforms for their attendees to mold the minds of the little people.
          Google didn’t spend millions of dollars for a luxurious vacation for these movers and shakers to simply go back home and get facials and pedicures.

          Liked by 6 people

          1. I think Chumpbarkslikeadog stepped a little too far over the line when he challenged the Speaker. He has been exiled until he serves his penance.

            Liked by 8 people

    1. It’s all smoke and mirrors.

      PLT (AOC) is still the puppet of her masters.

      Socialists “quitting” are not going far…musical chairs for those who hate America.

      Liked by 3 people

    2. Thanks for the link.

      For those who are excited about this, she will be running for re-election in 2020, and at least one of these people will be working on her campaign:

      “Ocasio-Cortez confirmed Trent’s move onto the campaign team in comments to the Intercept.

      “She added that he is ‘shifting to our campaign side so we can work on some ambitious comms projects we’ve been looking forward to working on.'”

      Liked by 1 person

  16. Anyone else notice that most of the photos of the taxpayer-funded, fun trip by Pelosi and lemmings shows Omar literally holding hands (kid you not!) or not more than 12” away from Nancy. Think Omar isn’t establishing a visual of her “closeness” to the Occupier of the Speaker Chair? (As in….don’t you come after me…i’m Tight with Nancy!) Jim Clyburn is so jealous!

    Liked by 10 people

      1. These absolutely have to get out there. First responders see this nonstop. Business owners see it. Poluticians drive past in limos or ubers or whatever and ignore it, bc they dont have to deal with it and those vagrant people cant contribute to their reelection campaigns.

        Liked by 9 people

        1. Right?! it’s one thing to live in a tent but the amount of addicts is staggering. We’re not talking passing the bong and hanging out…it’s hard hard stuff . People also talk of the mental thing that I learned from watching a lot the show Intervention…a lot of addicts act every bit mentally ill while they’re still using so it’s hard to make any kind of call on who is what out there.

          That many addicts, I can’t comprehend how they pay for their hits. Sure they steal but who they hell buys from them?

          And then this # Prop 47…jeeeezusH

          Liked by 8 people

          1. So the meth heads steal mail. They trade the mail for dope to dealers who bundle it to bigger dealers that do mail fraud, credit card scams etc.
            Meth us back in a big way here again. Remember when socal was the meth capurak? Specifically the inland empire? With the biker gangs gone from the biz, the cartels, who are ALL OVER so cal, have stepped in.
            Remember the toxic houses and storage units?
            The cartels do it x1000.

            Liked by 3 people

  17. August 15, 2019 Patriot Call In Supreme Court Demand Proof of Life For Ruth Bader Ginsburg

    Published on Aug 2, 2019

    On Thursday, August 15th, thousands of Patriots will call the Supreme Court Switchboard to demand Proof of Life for Ruth Bader Ginsburg. It is time to hold the Supreme Court accountable. Telephone: 202-479-3000 anytime between 9am and 5pm Eastern on Thurs, August 15, 2019.

    Liked by 6 people

    1. I can’t express how much I wish they wouldn’t do this. It makes our side look dumb and crazy, which is not a position of strength. It opens us up to (more) ridicule — only this time it would be deserved.

      In doing this they are calling into question the integrity and lawfulness (and therefore qualifications) of every justice on SCOTUS, including the conservative ones. It implies that all the justices are involved in a coverup,

      And no, RBG does not have a body double who has EVERYONE fooled. If anyone has an account of a time they were fooled by a body double for months, up close and personal, in the workplace or other close quarters, I’d like to hear about it.

      Liked by 8 people

      1. I do not think they are calling into the question the integrity of ALL of the Justices – just one – there is something fishy going on – and the reason they are doing this is to prevent PT from installing another Conservative on the Court – I do not believe she is alive – and all of those ‘planned’ appearances do not convince me she is – they all have body doubles – it was alleged ‘that other guy’ had (3) – no doubt in my mind – he is as dumb as rocks – so someone had to do the speaking for him…everyone has secrets – look what Roberts did – correctly made a call and then – suddenly reversed it – was he threatened or some member of his family?

        There is too much nonsense and lying going on in the gubmint – NOT to make me suspicious…up close and personal means nothing when you are told to keep your mouth shut or else – imho

        Liked by 4 people

        1. “I do not think they are calling into question the integrity of ALL of the Justices – just one ”
          Having a body double involves all of the justices. They either have all been fooled, or they are complicit.

          “they all have body doubles – it was alleged ‘that other guy’ had (3) ”
          I would love to see a link proving “they all have body doubles.” I’ve seen lots of innuendo and photoshopping, but that’s all.

          “up close and personal means nothing when you are told to keep your mouth shut or else”
          If RBG has a body double, then the people she works with are either being duped or are complicit by “keeping their mouth shut.” Do you really think the other eight justices would risk their careers for such a scheme (which amounts to sedition, in my opinion)? It’s not credible. The scheme could be brought to light and stopped.

          Body doubles have been used at times in history, but never in extended interactions, up close and personal, with people familiar with the person, that I know of. It’s too difficult to pull off.

          This short video explains what a day on SCOTUS is like.

          Liked by 2 people

          1. I appreciate your diligence in presenting your opinion – however – the Deep State – or whatever you want to call it – is devious – they are the ungodly – the integrity of the court was compromised when Roberts reversed his decision on O-care – the integrity of the House was compromised when the Speaker said – ‘you have to vote on the bill to see what is in it’ – the integrity of the court was compromised when they approved a justice who had previous experience with ‘that other guy’ – the integrity of the court was compromised when they voted in a justice because of her ethnic background – and yet her past actions proved bias – I do not share the same respect for those who serve on the court as you do – as far as RSB is concerned – I believe there is a concerted effort to prevent PT from appointing another conservative justice to the court – I also believe she is dead – and although I have no proof of a ‘double’ – they have used them in the past in other authoritative positions – anybody who has worked with her could write her decisions – it is all too easy to fool the public –

            The Deep State is deep and wide and devious – I have faith in God – not the Supreme Court.


            1. See the short novel _Double Star_ by Robert Heinlein. It’s “science fiction” like most of Heinlein’s other work, but really political fiction, with a look at the life of a serious professional stage actor.

              Liked by 2 people

      2. 100% agree TT.
        It is too much. Calling the switchboard will do nothing to confirm or deny. She herself has been in public lately and ruled from the bench supposedly. If there is some body double deal going on..the body double will make another appearance..what then ? We demand DNA? …

        Liked by 3 people

        1. “She herself has been in public lately and ruled from the bench supposedly.”
          According to the video at the link I posted above, the justices work with up to four clerks each. The clerks dgo over cases with them. The justices eat lunch together, and they consult on cases. There is no way the other eight, and all her clerks, have been fooled.

          Besides all the exact same physical characteristics (including vocal pitch, timbre, and speech patterns), a body double for RBG would have to have her exact knowledge of and experience in the law. What are the odds of someone who looks and sounds exactly like RBG, with her exact pattern of aging, having her extensive knowledge of the law and knowing her experiences so well that she could fool everyone who knows RBG? Those chances are zero and, in my opinion, we look very silly when we keep insisting this is possible without thinking logically and without looking at how SCOTUS actually works.

          Liked by 3 people

      3. “I can’t express how much I wish they wouldn’t do this. It makes our side look dumb and crazy, which is not a position of strength. It opens us up to (more) ridicule — only this time it would be deserved.”


        Considering the literally INFINITE levels and depths of deception the Left has engaged in (and continues to this very second), and considering that RBG sees herself as Leftist royalty who would literally die (or not die) for the cause, how is asking for proof that she is in fact ALIVE make “us” look dumb or crazy?

        And the enemy couldn’t hate us any more than they already do, so who cares what the enemy thinks about us anyway?

        Liked by 3 people

        1. “how is asking for proof that she is in fact ALIVE make “us” look dumb or crazy?”
          Because she is doing her SCOTUS work and those who claim she isn’t refuse to follow through logically on exactly how a body double would work in her case. How many people would have to be in on it, and who, exactly? It would involve every SCOTUS justice because they work with her. So those brilliant people at the top of their profession are either some of the most dupable people on the planet, or they are complicit.

          It would involve whatever clerks and aides RBG has, and maybe those of the other justices, too.
          It would involve others like chauffeurs, personal assistants, doormen, etc.
          It would involve every member of RBG’s family. Apparently everyone thinks they are all evil Leftists who would go along with such a scheme.

          I don’t care what the enemy thinks of us, but I’m embarrassed for those who think it’s so easy to pretend to be another human being in close quarters with people who know you. The only time I’m known of it to happen successfully is with identical twins, and even that fails after a while.

          Liked by 4 people

          1. “How many people would have to be in on it, and who, exactly?”


            How many people would have to be in on an attempted coup to overthrow the duly elected president of the United States?

            How many institutions and branches of government would have to be corrupted in order for that to happen?

            Which would be harder to do, and require the most people involved?

            A) an attempted coup to overthrow the president of the United States of America


            B) hide the death of a Supreme Court Justice, with the aid of a completely complicit media?

            If ‘A’ is possible, then the possibility of ‘B’ goes without saying.

            And ‘A’ is going on right now…

            Liked by 2 people

            1. “How many people would have to be in on an attempted coup to overthrow the duly elected president of the United States?”
              Many, as we are seeing. And it’s not the same as one well-known individual being replaced by an imposter and fooling everyone RBG knows, including all the SCOTUS justices. The two situations are not comparable.

              Liked by 1 person

          2. “I don’t care what the enemy thinks of us, but I’m embarrassed for those who think it’s so easy to pretend to be another human being in close quarters with people who know you.”


            I’m not suggesting that is the case, I have no idea what is actually going on, and neither does anyone else — and THAT is the problem.

            Which of the (not)Supreme Court Justices is beyond temptation or compromise?

            Or if not compromised, which could not be persuaded to ‘hide’ RBG’s death for “a little while”, for the interests of the ‘institution they ‘cherish’ so much?

            The Left would go along with such a scheme unflinchingly because it serves their cause to delay replacement with a conservative DJT pick, and the so-called ‘conservative’ judges might go along with it for any number of self-serving reasons wrapped up in denial and false altruism.

            I have NO IDEA what’s going on.

            Neither does anyone else.

            That is NOT how our Republic is designed or meant to function!

            So how about Ruthie drags her sorry Communist backside out in front of the cameras, to alleviate a legitimate public interest to know about her current health?

            Is that so wrong-guh?

            Liked by 2 people

            1. “I have no idea what is actually going on, and neither does anyone else — and THAT is the problem.”
              I find this puzzling. We know that RBG was ill, took time to recover, and is back at work at SCOTUS. The reason we know that is that there are at least four justiceas who would not stand for the kind of sedition people are alleging.

              Liked by 1 person

              1. “The reason we know that is that there are at least four justiceas who would not stand for the kind of sedition people are alleging.”


                How do we know THAT?!?

                Most people trusted Scalia, before he was found murdered at some kind of exclusive and isolated pedo-camp weekend getaway, where his body was immediately cremated without autopsy, because… that’s just normal… when a national figure suddenly dies under cartoonishly mysterious circumstances…

                Roberts is so off the rails that he might as well come out openly as a double-agent.

                Which of the remaining four is a citizen above suspicion?


                Liked by 1 person

              2. Do you think:
                — It is possible for RBG to have a body double who looks and sounds exactly like her?
                — That that body double can portray her decades of experience and knowledge as well as be able to credibly relate to her clerks and the other eight justices to the point that they suspect nothing?
                — Or that all the clerks and justices are so corrupt that they would allow an imposter to take RBG’s place, jeopardizing their own careers and freedom, as well as the very country?
                — That RBG’s entire family, knowing she is dead, is complicit in a plot to keep her on SCOTUS, forgoing the honorable funeral she would have had and being prepared to participate in a sham funeral when the imposter “dies”?

                Liked by 3 people

              3. “Do you think:
                — It is possible for RBG to have a body double who looks and sounds exactly like her?”


                Sure, it’s possible, with 7+ billion people on the planet, we all probably have at least several people who look enough like us that with a little effort, could do so convincingly.

                But I’m not arguing that there is any ‘body double’ involved here.

                I don’t know if she is dead or alive.

                The only photos I am aware of appear to be from walking through an airport several years ago, and the only recent audio I am aware of was during (supposedly) a (not)Supreme Court case, but someone showed that the audio had been edited, because one of the lawyers asked the exact same question, in the exact same voice, with the exact same tonal inflections, TWICE. Not two separate occurrences, but the SAME audio, spliced back in and repeated.

                And considering the level of institutional and professional DECEPTION we are dealing with, I don’t know how anybody could trust ANYONE in our government.

                If there is anyone who is LESS trustworthy than employees of our government — who would that be, exactly?

                And I do mean ANYONE.


                “— That that body double can portray her decades of experience and knowledge as well as be able to credibly relate to her clerks and the other eight justices to the point that they suspect nothing?”


                I am not arguing that there is any body double involved here. When was the last time she was seen in public?

                I don’t know the answer to that question.


                “— Or that all the clerks and justices are so corrupt that they would allow an imposter to take RBG’s place, jeopardizing their own careers and freedom, as well as the very country?”


                Yes, it’s hard to believe you doubt the possibility — that would be child’s play for the level of institutional psychopathy we’re dealing with here. LOOK at the breadth and depth of the conspiracy against the president of the United States.

                Just LOOK at it. Think about it. It’s breathtaking.

                Whatever would be required to hide the death of RBG, it is MINUSCULE by comparison.


                “— That RBG’s entire family, knowing she is dead, is complicit in a plot to keep her on SCOTUS, forgoing the honorable funeral she would have had and being prepared to participate in a sham funeral when the imposter “dies”?”


                Where was Scalia’s family, when he was found murdered at Pedo’s Runaway Ranch? Where was their DEMAND for an ‘investigation’, or at the very least an autopsy?

                Do you really think they can’t get to the family members?

                This is exactly how the government became so corrupt that a conspiracy of the size required to attempt a coup against the president could even take place.

                It’s because most people CANNOT believe it, that it could ever happen.

                The bad guys KNOW that, they know that the truth of what they do is so incredibly brazen and audacious and outrageous that most people would never believe it — and they absolutely use that ‘psychology to their advantage.

                Trust no one.

                Trust members of our government, even less.

                A LOT less.

                Including and especially clerks and other lower level functionaries.

                If the top people can be wholly compromised or corrupted, how much easier must it be to compromise their lackeys?

                Liked by 2 people

              4. Which 4 justices are these?

                I hope you’re not putting Roberts’ name on that roster??

                Btw, how is his cleanup of the FISA court going?

                Liked by 2 people

              5. From this thread:

                “Or that all the clerks and justices are so corrupt that they would allow an imposter to take RBG’s place, jeopardizing their own careers and freedom, as well as the very country?”

                Let’s think about this question for a moment, from a different point of view. This point of view is inspired by Scott’s analogy to the Soft Coup, from his posts elsewhere in this thread.

                Has James Comey’s freedom been jeopardized yet? How about Herr Müller’s, AKA Sideshow Bob’s? al-Brennan’s? Clapper’s? McCabe’s? Bruce Ohr’s? His lovely wife, Nelson’s? Peter Strozk’s? His girlfriend, Mrs. Paige’s? Barry Soebarkah’s? Eric Holder’s? Loretta Lynch’s? Sally Yates’? Susan Powers’? Joe Biden’s? (The last time I heard about Joe Biden, he was being confidently touted as a front runner for the Democrat Party’s nomination to be the next president of the United States.)

                Has Christopher Steele’s freedom been called into question yet, by anyone at all, even by anyone who contributes to this board? Oleg Deripaska’s? Tashina Gauhar’s? Rybicki’s? Sen. ChiSpy’s? The freedom of any member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence? Any at all?

                If justices on the Supreme Court of the United States are involved somehow, or keeping their silence for some reason, in a conspiracy to conceal the death of one of their number, would President Trump or Attorney General Barr be in a political position now to seek to bring about the arrest of one or more of them?

                I submit that among the awesome powers entrusted to President Trump and to the law enforcement officers under him, the practical ability to threaten the freedom of multiple SCOTUS justices is one of the few that is not among them, given the realities of the moment.


        2. Bingo! Left, D-Rats, MCM, talking heads despise every one of us.

          Personally don’t care what they think of me.

          Sticker on my truck states, “I am 100% Deplorable”.

          I am good with proof of life and all her marbles are functioning in a logical coherent way.

          100% the Left / D-Rats will deceive and cheat every opportunity the bastards get. Don’t believe, explain a rationale for the lefty / D-Rat behavior over the past three years towards President Trump, America, Americans…you and I.

          Liked by 3 people

  18. I think we may be looking at the future Mayor of New York City.

    NYC Police Benevolent Association President Patrick J. Lynch and Attorney Stuart London hold a press conference to discuss NYPD Trial Commissioner’s decision in the disciplinary trial of Officer Daniel Pantaleo.

    Liked by 4 people

    1. Easy solution to this situation.

      The officers of the police department in NYC should issue a brief statement:

      To Our Fellow Citizens of New York:

      On or before Friday, August 16, one of two things will happen:

      1) Mayor DeBlasio will resign


      2) every officer in the NYC police department goes on strike, and you call the Mayor’s Office when you have a problem, instead of calling 911.

      Thank you very much,

      The Police Officers of New York City

      Then sit back and watch the fireworks. 👍

      I would absolutely do it. If I was a NYC cop, whether we had a ‘union’ or not, I would organize it, I would write the statement, and I would publish it.

      If I had aspirations for public office, I would publish it with my name on it.

      If I wanted to create an even greater panic among the political-class, I would publish it anonymously, and think up a ‘scary’ name to attribute it to, like serial killers do in the movies.

      Ratchet the public fear up another notch with each passing day, until the Mayor’s office explodes.

      I guarantee the millions of people of NYC will hunt DeBlasio down themselves, before they allow the police to go on strike on August 16th.

      In the words of Justin Wilson, “I guaaaa-ron-teeeee!”.


      Liked by 9 people

  19. Because I think optimistically… Nice thread from Jeff Carlson. Keeping sane. I chose a tweet from the thread: click on date stamp for the rest. No threadreader available yet.

    Liked by 11 people

    1. Liked by 12 people

      1. I can’t help but think that most if not all of the major cities that have been DemonCrap dynasties for decades will be riddled with corruption, and probably well disguised with lack of or non-compliance with accounting procedures.

        Liked by 11 people

      2. Thank you for posting this. It’s a good thing Pres. Trump wins so much; otherwise, a segment of his base would collapse. And thank goodness we have Q to encourage us.

        Liked by 8 people

      3. “8) Meanwhile, Trump has started highlighting corruption in Baltimore.”


        Highlighting corruption (again) (and again) (and again) is lovely…

        But nothing really says I LOVE YOU like making ARRESTS.

        And that’s the ONE thing they absolutely REFUSE to ever do.

        [cue the audio loop]



        Liked by 3 people

    2. “Sue will be considered for the ACTING.(DNI)” Notice how the President says we will be making another choice. Very careful word choice.

      I am not worried about this. I love FG&C’s suggestion—Admiral Rogers for DNI! I would pay just to see the reactions!

      Liked by 9 people

      1. @8min25sec Listen to what the President says…I do have a short list of 2 or 3 people who would be confirmed easily because they have been in this business. I like Sue for ACTING! (Paraphrased)

        Please make tons of splodey heads with Admiral Rogers!

        Liked by 10 people

      2. JW, I worry about what I can do something about, and these things, in POTUS’ hands, are not something I can do anything about. 🙂 I don’t think we need to get too much in the weeds on this – if something is wrong with his choice, it will come out. Good pickup on “another choice.” Leaves them guessing.

        Liked by 3 people

    1. GREAT take away stated by Steve Bannon…something to the effect of…

      Democrat Presidential candidates are like a summer replacement show, that doesn’t get pick up in the fall.

      Liked by 6 people

    1. “Of course this is the yahoo headline: Anti-Muslim Activist Laura Loomer to Run for Congress”


      If islam wasn’t a religion of hate, oppression, murder, atrocities and crimes against humanity, muzzies wouldn’t be a problem.

      So there’s no need to be anti-muzzie.

      Just be anti-islam.

      Who is FOR hate, oppression, murder, atrocities and crimes against humanity?

      You can’t be against those things and be pro-islam.

      So any time someone accuses you of being anti-muzzie, just say it’s not the muzzies that are the problem, it’s the teachings and example of the mass-murderer they follow.

      Ask them “Are you FOR terrorism? Are you FOR mass-murder? Are you FOR rape, incest, pedophilia, slavery and other crimes against humanity?


      Then you can’t be pro-islam, can you?

      Now go ask the muzzies those same questions!

      Liked by 9 people

  20. (chimes) PAGING MARICA……MARICA…….

    Waiting for your post re: the Trump rally. How was it??? Details, please.

    We were all excited you were there and folks were posting your tweets!!!!

    Liked by 6 people

    1. Working on it…I am very far behind IRL as we are leaving early tomorrow morning for Florida for a week…
      For my sister’s take and my quick 10 point takeaway….go to the bottom of Daughn’s Rally thread!!!

      It was another AMAZING experience!!!! DO IT! If you haven’t been..or even if you have!! my 4th PLUS the Inauguration–I Will honestly go any chance I get!!! Better than any Rock Concert!! Ever!!!

      Liked by 11 people

  21. PS–For anyone still UP!!! Please send prayers for Sylvia!! Blood Pressure is dangerously high and she doesn’t want to go to the ER!!! Thanks Everyone!!!!

    Liked by 14 people

    1. I just sent an email to her.


      Marica says your BP is way up. She says you refuse to go to the ER.

      As a friend, I say,


      You are of no use to anyone if you’re in a home after a stroke. Don’t make me use your shovel on you.

      pgroup (Lawrence Hutt)

      Liked by 7 people

        1. What? You’re sounding like some nitpicking word nazi. If she doesn’t WANT to go but she DID go, why not just say that? If she doesn’t WANT to go and she DIDN’T go, isn’t that what I said in my email?

          Next time, just ask for prayers if that’s what you want from the Qtreepers. Love you dearly but darn you can be a bit trying at times.

          Liked by 1 person

        1. It just refuses to show my posts after I click ‘post comment’. About 1 out of 3 comments doesn’t show unless I go through gyrations and a couple of refreshes. Plus it takes me to the top of the page so it’s scroll like mad to get back to where I was. Annoying as heck.

          As far as my name, at my age – in this safe place –

          Frankly my dear I don’t give a damn. 🙂

          Liked by 2 people

      1. Wolfie!!!! The One With COMEY in the woods!!! I am Laughing so hard I’m CRYING!!!! I gotta figure out how to save it and troll Comey on his next tweet or something!!!

        Liked by 6 people

    1. Haaaaa.
      These are such fun!
      I love them!

      Do you know this Louis Pima guy, Marica?
      Is he a friend?

      Thank you for sharing your fabulous Rally pics with us!
      I’m so glad you got to go.
      While watching the Rally…I kept thinking, ‘Wow, our Marica is there somewhere’.
      It’s almost like being there too!

      Liked by 6 people

      1. Aw Wheatie!!! YOU GUYS WERE WITH ME!!! I looked at the whole experience from the eyes of being part of the Q tree! Louis is a total stranger..just part of my twitter family ! They all make me laugh hysterically!!

        Liked by 6 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s