Our President played these POS in the Democrat and Republican Party beautifully. He will sign the appropriation bills once Congress passes it. It has already passed in the Senate and will be voted by the House later this evening.

He got the Turtle 🐢 to come out in support of him declaring a National Emergency for the remaining funds to complete the entire project. Nancy Pelosi will have the House terminate the National Emergency with a simple majority. However, with Mitch’s support, the bill will never be taken up for a vote in the Senate.

They will run to a liberal judge to put an injunction on the President’s declaration.

The problem for Nancy, the Democrats, RINOs, MSM, Never Trumpers etc. is that the Supreme Court will immediately hear the case and will put the injunction aside the same way they did with the travel ban. We will win with the Supreme Court since the President has the authority passed by Congress many decades ago.

Larry has been saying the following for the past two days. He is absolutely right!

Once again the Never Trumpers show themselves.

Our President shows Americans and the world that he will do everything in his power to protect our country.

God Bless and protect PDJT!


127 thoughts on “We Can Now Say FINISH THE WALL

  1. President Trump’s blood pressure is most likely reading “normal”. There are likely a few other men/women as steely as he is, but right now he stands alone. I am picturing that giant Italian statue, and it depicts him perfectly.

    How busy do you think that Congressional pharmacy is today? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

    Liked by 18 people

    1. Not worried at ALL about the “precedent” thing…….
      Dems will use “Executive Order” AGAIN anyway….
      Never stopped them before….
      So why would it stop them in the future?
      DIMs play for keeps and to win……
      Rep’s … Not so much.

      Liked by 17 people

      1. Those that are worried about them declaring a National Emergency for Climate Change, Healthcare etc. is that there is not enough money in any appropriation bill to fund their craziness. Our President isn’t printing money. He is using money that the DoD never used in the past plus current funding for projects (i.e. building a Wall in Iraq).

        Liked by 13 people

      2. “Not worried at ALL about the “precedent” thing…….
        Dems will use “Executive Order” AGAIN anyway….”




        “Never stopped them before….
        So why would it stop them in the future?”




        “DIMs play for keeps and to win……
        Rep’s … Not so much.”



        Liked by 2 people

    2. Well, Rayzor, you knew the Dems were not going to give in on the $5 billion. Conversely, PDJT has stated numerous times there is money he can access for building the wall without Congressional approval, which will likely be used in the interim while the Emergency Declaration gets decided in the SC in the President’s favor. Whatever the case, the Donald keeps building the wall.

      My concern, and I haven’t heard, did we remain firm on funding for ICE and border patrol, and increased holding facilities for ICE?

      Liked by 3 people

      1. We need word about this to get out. People are having fits. Some people (not talking about anyone here) don’t use their heads at all and have no imagination when it comes to actual possibilities.

        Liked by 8 people

      2. fleporeblog.


        The state parks are now so dangerous they have warning signs.

        “The federal government has posted signs along a major interstate highway in Arizona, more than 100 miles north of the U.S.-Mexico border, warning travelers the area is unsafe because of drug and alien smugglers, and a local sheriff says Mexican drug cartels now control some parts of the state.

        The signs were posted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) along a 60-mile stretch of Interstate 8 between Casa Grande and Gila Bend, a major east-west corridor linking Tucson and Phoenix with San Diego.

        They warn travelers that they are entering an “active drug and human smuggling area” and they may encounter “armed criminals and smuggling vehicles traveling at high rates of speed.” Beginning less than 50 miles south of Phoenix, the signs encourage travelers to “use public lands north of Interstate 8” and to call 911 if they “see suspicious activity.”

        Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu, whose county lies at the center of major drug and alien smuggling routes to Phoenix and cities east and west, attests to the violence. He said his deputies are outmanned and outgunned by drug traffickers in the rough-hewn desert stretches of his own county.

        “Mexican drug cartels literally do control parts of Arizona,” he said. “They literally have scouts on the high points in the mountains and in the hills and they literally control movement. They have radios, they have optics, they have night-vision goggles as good as anything law enforcement has.

        “This is going on here in Arizona,” he said. “This is 70 to 80 miles from the border – 30 miles from the fifth-largest city in the United States.”

        He said he asked the Obama administration for 3,000 National Guard soldiers to patrol the border, but what he got were 15 signs.….”

        Liked by 6 people

          1. You misunderstand.
            The bill specifically states NO WALL in the federal parks that are on the border.

            That is a MAJOR part of the Drug corridors. Whether the Roosevelt Reservation, the 60 foot corridor along the border will technically get around that section of the bill I do not know.


            Securing our Border on Federal Lands: Problem Overview
            (No longer available, maybe archived)

            “…“Some of the most dangerous areas along the southern border are the 20.7 million acres of Department of the Interior (DOI) and U.S. Forest Service (USFS) land. This includes 4.3 million acres of “Wilderness areas” where activities such as the use of motorized vehicles and construction of roads and structures are prohibited.

            Documents show that the Department of the Interior and the U.S. Forest Service have consistently and actively taken steps that prevent the Border Patrol from securing our nation’s borders on federal lands. According to internal memos, DOI officials have asserted that the Wilderness Act of 1964 trumps border security legislation passed by Congress.…

            According to the Department of the Interior’s FY 2003 Public Lands Threat Assessment Report:
            “Virtually all of the lands managed by Department of The Interior (DOI) along the Arizona/Mexico border are sparsely populated with easy access into the United States from Mexico. Terrorist wishing to smuggle nuclear – biological – or chemical (NBC) weapons into the United States from Mexico could use well-established smuggling routes over DOI managed lands.”

            National parks and forests have become some of the most dangerous and violent areas along the border where shootings, robberies, rapes, murders, kidnappings and car-jackings frequently occur.
            Drug Trafficking Organizations use federal lands along the border to smuggle drugs such as marijuana, cocaine, black tar heroin and methamphetamines into the U.S. Along the southern border, 80% of drug smuggling occurs between official border entry points. Drugs are frequently stuffed into vehicles and taken across the border. The drugs are collected and then the vehicles are abandoned.

            Because of the high crime rates, many of these areas have been rendered unsafe for entry by U.S. citizens, including land managers and employees. The security risks are so great that the National Park Service even warns visitors about them on its website for Big Bend National Park…. “


            The Roosevelt Easement allows the federal government access to 60 of the border with Mexico. This is from a GAO report: “The land where this fencing was built has been publicly owned since 1907 when President Theodore Roosevelt reserved a 60-foot strip along the international boundary with Mexico for the United States to maintain the area free from obstructions as a protection against the smuggling of goods between the United States and Mexico. In effect, the Roosevelt easement provided the federal government with a 60-foot border right-of-way on which it could build the fence.”

            The federal government has the power to construct a fence along the border to protect the United States. In fact, in 2008 DHS Secretary Chertoff issued a waiver “to bypass environmental reviews to speed construction of fencing along the Mexican border.” – Ristvan the Lurking Lawyer

            Liked by 1 person

              1. The DoD will take care of those areas since they have say on all private and public lands. That will be taken care of with the money from the National Emergency!


        1. IIRC the provisions are tied to particular department budgets. The DHS budget cannot be used to do certain things. OKFINE, use the DoD funds for that part, and move the other parts under the DHS bucket.

          Normally can’t do that shuffle-roo. Dems though they had him. But by going on to declare a National Emergency, suddenly he has that authority.

          CHECK. Mate in 5.

          Liked by 1 person

  2. Two funding possibilities…


    and this:

    Liked by 3 people

    1. I do not trust McTurtle he and Ryan screwed POTUS last time. I pray POTUS has his take on that man.
      POTUS is smart and delta with corrupted politicians in NYC my husband tells me.

      One thing I find offensive also is that Democrats call it Trump wall. The wall is not Trumps wall is the wall of USA and its people. The wall define the border of this country and is needed since every Jo (Hans and Franz)
      believe they can just walk into this country.

      They should have border guard station every 10 miles with dogs . These people need to be deterred.
      !800 people came last Monday according to Laura Ingraham.
      People come with kids they will not work because what will they do with the kids..? The kids will have to go to school and there is more overcrowding. They need housing and food.

      The money that all of this cost. I never took a hand out when 1964 immigrating . Why can we not go back and that everyone needs a sponsor ? Also that without a green card one cannot work and employers are held responsible hirer illegals.
      I also had to every year fill out a post card so immigration knew where I was. That lasted to mid seventies.
      I could not leave the country unless I was able to show I paid my taxes. Does that not apply any longer.?
      We would catch all the illegals when they go home visiting if they paid taxes..?

      What ever POTUS decides I am with him.

      Liked by 6 people

  3. My wish for the day…

    President Trump have a grand bill signing with D-Rats and RepubliCONs in attendance. Sign the bill, congrat the Uniparty on a half @ss job and declare a National emergency to fund the wall.

    Then take questions from MSM.

    Unfortunately for me, President Trunp takes the high road playing the long game. Me childish looking for revenge on Uniparty.

    Liked by 6 people

    1. “…congrat the Uniparty on a half @ss job…”
      LOL. So true! They all have to be thanked.

      “Me childish looking for revenge on Uniparty.”
      Most of us are children of that sort, I think.

      Liked by 7 people

  4. Liked by 10 people

  5. My goodness, the negativity at the other tree is phenomenal. Wow. Just shockingly against PDT. “He got played!” Ugh. Some fighting back over there, but a lot of wailing and bashing of teeth. 😕

    Liked by 13 people

    1. Thank goodness Trump is President and the armchair quarterbacks at OT (and elsewhere) are not.

      Were they not listening when POTUS stated weeks ago that he would declare a National Emergency if Congress did not get their act together? Or did it just go in one ear and out the other.

      I swear, some of the whiners on our side are worse than the lefties.

      Liked by 14 people

        1. No matter how much winning we do, just remember, if you look hard enough, and long enough, and down enough, you can always, ALWAYS find something to complain about!

          “Oh man, there goes the sun again… it’ll be gone all night long…”

          Liked by 3 people

    2. “My goodness, the negativity at the other tree is phenomenal. Wow. Just shockingly against PDT. “He got played!” Ugh. Some fighting back over there, but a lot of wailing and bashing of teeth. ”


      I liked this reply to all the Eeyores, from someone named Jake:

      “Jake says:
      February 15, 2019 at 1:29 am

      Trust Trump, or GTFO, this hand wringing sad song, just kill yourself, it’s Trump or we are finished anyway,”


      In other words, Trump or Bust!


  6. Question — does the national emergency empower the troops that have been sent to the border to actually do whatever needs to be done to stop the invasion? I always think to myself, what exactly are they allowed to do aside from just being a presence?

    Liked by 4 people

    1. Not much.

      Once an illegal sets a toe on US soil he is ‘protected’ by US laws.

      Prior to that it would be invading Mexico.

      About all they can do is use tear gas, sonic and other non-lethal deterents but CNN and the rest of the Yellow Stream Media is there to video-broadcast every little kid who stubs a toe or cries because it’s hungry and then call Trump a BIG MEANIE!

      It is enough to make a sane person SCREAM!

      Forget about marching on D.C.

      Mmaybe we should organize in packs and ‘OCCUPY’ the front of every single Federal elected officials HOME and office in each state. And DEMAND we get FREE MEALS and FREE CLOTHES and medical care and beds and…

      After all if they illegals are welcomed in our country with food and beds and clothes and medical care, WHAT ABOUT US???

      Liked by 6 people


    He goes over all the poison pills added to get a WHOLE 57 miles of OLD STYLE FENCE.

    Mitch the Post Turtle Flipped American’s the MIDDLE FINGER! 😡

    Liked by 3 people

              1. First off, you need to know I have never trusted Gaetz and I still don’t after watching that. IMO, he is being VERY disingenuous and is not being 100% truthful. There IS amnesty in this bill – amnesty for cartel human smugglers and illegals already present with the restrictions surrounding UACs. JMO – I understand it was passed with a veto-proof majority but, IMO, PDJT WILL lose supporters if he signs it. The fact of the matter is, he PROMISED he would not do this again.

                Liked by 2 people

            1. “JMO – I understand it was passed with a veto-proof majority but, IMO, PDJT WILL lose supporters if he signs it. The fact of the matter is, he PROMISED he would not do this again.”


              I share your frustration and I have the same questions. If local towns, burgs, villages, hamlets and municipalities all are given the power to refuse the wall being built in their neck of the woods, then the entire concept of a wall is kaput.

              Wherever the wall ISN’T, that’s where the bad guys will come through, and devilrats are undoubtedly in charge of lots of lots of towns along the border.

              So what gives?

              It could be that it makes no sense to veto a veto-proof majority, so DJT takes what he gets, which is Congressional approval to fund the wall with $1.3 billion dollars. Why is that important? Not sure, but possibly because the devilrats and RINOs can never say DJT built the wall without Congressional approval, so it would likewise take a future president Congressional approval to tear it down. Just speculating.

              It could be that the declaration of a National Emergency overrides the ability of local towns to refuse the wall.

              It could be that many of the poison pills (including the ability for local towns to refuse a matter of national security…) are blatantly unconstitutional, and will be challenged to the (not)Supreme Court, and thrown out, one by one.

              It could be that DJT already knows something we only hope, i.e., that the devilrats are going to be wiped out in 2020, that they will become electorally extinct. So between now and then, DJT builds the wall and new AG Barr fights each attempted injunction while DJT builds and builds and builds, and when the devilrats are exterminated in 2020, new super-majorities in both Houses of Congress repeal not only the bogus law passed today, but thousands of other bogus laws passed by corrupt politicians over the past 70 years.

              Or some combination of the above.

              The thing is, DJT knows the truth about things which we can only speculate and hope about. He knows whether Clinton and hussein are going to be prosecuted and put to death. He knows whether massive election fraud was documented and many of the new House devilrats (and maybe some senators) are going to have their elections overturned.

              He knows whether new safeguards to the 2020 election to prevent fraud will have a massive negative affect on the devilrats.

              He knows whether he is going to declassify FISA and everything else, and when.

              He knows when he is going to DROP the HAMMER on the entire global crime syndicate.

              Or not.

              He knows.

              So the best we can do is trust what DJT is doing, because he knows the answers to all the things we don’t.

              And we don’t really have any choice but to trust DJT anyway, because, basically, we’re ‘Trump or Bust!’ and have been since he came down the gold escalator.

              Liked by 1 person

    1. That is my hope.

      There is too much dangerous crap in that bill to take a chance with it. Laws ARE NEVER rescinded!

      That is what progressivism is. They creep towards Communism an inch at a time and NEVER EVER RETREAT.

      Have they gotten rid of the Federal Reserve Act? Has Congress even TRIED?

      Liked by 7 people

      1. Can’t build on federal land
        Can’t build through the Rio Grande Valley
        Can be blocked by local government….MAYORS??
        And that doesn’t include the decrease in detention beds and several other things I have heard.

        I bet he has an ACE up his sleeve 😁

        Liked by 6 people

    1. “New Q Drops!!!!”


      These are some of my very favorite kinds of Q drops:

      14 Feb 2019 – 11:31:08 PM

      No mercy.
      No bargaining.
      A Traitor’s justice.

      Make it so.

      Liked by 1 person

    1. 🤣

      Well you missed out on my tearing a strip off of one of Mitch, the Post Turtle’s staffers on the phone this afternoon.. The nicest thing I said was

      “Is McConnell taking pay offs from the Drug Cartels, the Chinese or the Child Sex trafficers?” And then I really hit my stride.

      Liked by 12 people

      1. “The nicest thing I said was

        ‘Is McConnell taking pay offs from the Drug Cartels, the Chinese or the Child Sex trafficers?’ ”


        Is there any technical reason why it couldn’t be all three?


      2. Gail Combs


        “Well you missed out on my tearing a strip off of one of Mitch, the Post Turtle’s staffers on the phone this afternoon.. The nicest thing I said was

        “Is McConnell taking pay offs from the Drug Cartels, the Chinese or the Child Sex trafficers?” And then I really hit my stride.”
        Best post . Oh how I loath the Turtle and I am embarrass about it.
        Any person who crosses POTUS is not my friend.

        Rush has a good program today well worth listening.


        Liked by 1 person


    Liked by 6 people

  9. Only caveat I’ve read that gives me pause is at Breitbart by Ken Klukowski. (sorry I can’t link). He cautions that there could be “even a single sentence” in the bill that somehow negates Nat’l Emergency power tge Pres would normally have.

    He says Pres has 10 days to sign the bill and it should be examined word-for-word to make sure nothing in there negates an existing power.

    I pray the President’s lawyers are up to snuff.

    Liked by 7 people

    1. Most of those tweets above were written in January. They don’t address whether something in this bill can specifically negate Presudent’s ability to use Nat’l Emergency declaration.

      Stay tuned ! Wolfie which part of the roller coster are we on?

      Liked by 3 people

    2. “The White House should be extremely cautious in studying every single word in Congress’s spending bill, because even a single phrase could negate every authority President Donald Trump currently has under federal law to build and fund the border wall, even canceling his authority to declare a national border emergency.

      Insiders around D.C. are talking about how the president can sign the spending bill that was unveiled this week, take the money that it authorizes for building a wall, then use executive authority to fund the rest of it. The president must proceed with extreme caution, because the opponents of the wall are the ones writing this 1,169-page monster legislation, and a single unnoticed sentence could lead to a court ruling that the president has signed away all of this legal authority to secure the border – including emergency authority.”


      Liked by 3 people

      1. So he does NOT have to sign this bill.

        “Under current law, the president has a host of methods to build the border wall. The Secure Fence Act of 2006 authorizes building the wall, so the issue becomes one of funding. He does not require any additional authority from Congress; he requires only money.

        If President Trump declares an emergency under the National Emergencies Act of 1976 (found at 50 U.S.C. § 1601) – as he says he will – then under 33 U.S.C. § 2293 he would have immediate access to $14 billion and could direct the acting defense secretary to order the Army Corps of Engineers to build the wall with that money.

        That is far more than the $5.7 billion he needs for the most critical 231 miles of border wall, and does not even count whatever Congress has supposedly given him in this enormous spending bill.”

        Liked by 3 people

        1. “If the president signs this legislation, and the U.S. House votes to authorize Pelosi to sue the president in federal court or some other plaintiff is found to have standing to seek a court order to stop the wall’s construction, courts will apply the last-in-time rule: Whenever two statutes passed by Congress are inconsistent, the more recently enacted one supersedes the earlier law. Under a separate canon of statutory interpretation, a narrower provision in a law – such as a provision that specifies what can and cannot be built on the U.S.-Mexican border – supersedes a broader provision of federal law.

          So if there is anything in this 1,169-page bill that purports to limit the president’s ability to build or fund the wall, then all the statutory authorities listed above would be cancelled. The president’s lawyers should expect Democrats are attempting to do precisely that, and study every comma in that bill. He needs to ensure that nothing snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

          If the president needs to sign another continuing resolution (CR) to fund the government for another few days while his lawyers examine the massive bill, then so be it. The Constitution gives him ten days to sign the major bill. He can take all the time necessary to confirm there are no poison pills in the bill.”

          Liked by 4 people

    3. .i heard on pod cast PTrump lawyer is it Seculow?
      He said P Trumps lawyers have been going over the bill since last night. He also said that they have until Tuesday to sign . They want P Trump to sign tonight because they Turtle want to go home since Monday is a holiday.
      What a cushy job they have and the rest of people bust their chaps.

      Liked by 5 people

    1. Mulvaney told Brian Kilmeade WH has been digging up money and preparing for legal challenges for last 3 months. McConnell has also known and supports. House just passed Bill. All we need now is POTUS’ signature.

      Liked by 7 people

      1. “Multiple sources inside the White House have confirmed for Big League Politics that high-level officials within the President Donald J. Trump’s administration – without Trump’s knowledge – denied Angel Moms a meeting with Trump to discuss Thursday’s proposed budget bill, which does not include full border wall funding.

        Sabine Durden, one of the Angel Moms, a group of brave activists whose children have been slain by illegal aliens, was denied the opportunity to meet with Trump to discuss her opposition to the budget.

        “Somebody doesn’t want Donald Trump to see us, because one look at us and our dead children, and he won’t want to sign that bill,” said Angel Mom Sabine Durden. “This request to meet with Donald Trump has been put in for quite some time, so it was a surprise.”

        According to multiple sources, Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney and Director of Strategic Communications Mercedes Schlapp personally nuked the meeting. The sources told BLP that Trump does not even know that the Angel Moms are in Washington, D.C., and that his staff is actively working to make sure that Trump does not learn of their presence.”


        Liked by 2 people

        1. “According to multiple sources, Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney and Director of Strategic Communications Mercedes Schlapp personally nuked the meeting. The sources told BLP that Trump does not even know that the Angel Moms are in Washington, D.C., and that his staff is actively working to make sure that Trump does not learn of their presence.”


          If that’s true, then both Schlapp and Mulvaney need to be fired.

          The president must have all available information in order to make the best decision. He knows things that Schlapp and Mulvaney don’t.

          If Schlapp and Mulvaney set out to deprive the president of information, without knowing things the president knows but which Schlapp and Mulvaney don’t, that’s a recipe for disaster.

          Liked by 2 people

  10. “A Republican-Democrat spending bill being offered to President Trump will spark the “largest surge” of young border crossers that “the country has ever seen,” immigration experts warn.

    Pro-American immigration reformers and experts across the board are denouncing the spending package as a scheme to increase the illegal alien population, to provide a de facto amnesty to illegal aliens already living in the United States, and to expand the Catch and Release of border crossers.”

    $1.3 billion for 55 miles of steel bollard fencing
    An expansion of Catch and Release
    A potential doubling of the annual low-skilled foreign workers imported to the U.S.
    Less detention space for border crossers
    An amnesty pipeline for Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC) and their relatives
    Stipulations requiring local officials to approve all wall construction
    Chokeholds on immigration enforcement at the border and in the interior

    Federation for American Immigration Reform President Dan Stein specifically called out the de facto amnesty included in the spending deal that would provide all illegal aliens with close relations to newly resettled UACs be shielded from deportation.

    “In simple English, every new unaccompanied minor who arrives at our border will trigger an amnesty for multiple adult illegal aliens who are already in the country,” Stein said of the provision. “The illegal aliens who will be eligible for protection from removal include not just actual sponsors, but those who might be potential sponsors and every member of their households.”

    “If this bill is enacted, expect the largest surge of unaccompanied minors this country has ever seen,” Stein said, urging Trump to veto the deal.”



    1. “Officials with NumbersUSA, which fights on behalf of American workers in the immigration debate, said Trump was not given the full text of the spending deal that included the UAC de facto amnesty provision or the language that allows Homeland Security officials to double the number of H-2B foreign workers imported to the country every year to take U.S. blue collar jobs.

      .@POTUS The legislative text sent to Pres. Trump and he agreed to sign did not have the language rewarding child trafficking, granting immunity to large % of illegal aliens, and increasing H-2Bs. That was added on later and then rammed through the Senate. Bait and Switch!

      — NumbersUSA (@NumbersUSA) February 15, 2019”

      Liked by 1 person

  11. Daughnworks husband here a/k/a “another lurking lawyer”.

    Not to get hung up on process but it is very important here.

    The statutory authority exercised by Trump was passed by a Democrat-controlled Congress in 1976. Congress has power under the act to undo a state of emergency declaration with either a joint resolution and the President’s signature, or with a veto-proof majority vote. The legislation was signed by President Gerald Ford on September 14, 1976. Legislative history suggests it was enacted as an affirmative and specific check on what was seen as rampant overreach by the Executive Branch. The explicit incorporation of Congressional oversight into the act distinguishes it from an Executive Order, Obama’s favorite tool for avoidance of the legislative branch’s “check” on his power.

    As of January 2019, the United States is presently under 31 previously declared and continuing states of national emergency. Obama himself declared 17 NE’s during his tenure. The president’s declaration of a National Emergency is different from enforcement. The declaration simply gives him added powers within the statutory framework. The progressives cannot challenge the mere act of declaring a national emergency because it is clearly legal and has been used without challenge so many times. The president has been very careful to provide a clear, publicized factual basis for the declaration and there is simply no hope, short of outright partisan illegality by a judge, to say the declaration is subject to injunction.

    Thus, the only hope for the Insane Lefties is to claim a particular action, a transfer of funds or a redirection of assets, is outside his NE powers. This puts them in a reactionary position because each separate executive act likely will have its own factual predicate, parties involved and different jurisdiction. An immediate filing now is premature and subject to immediate dismissal as premature. I am not sure that the IL’s see this problem.

    Liked by 5 people

  12. NeverTrump Dana Loesch tweeted: “What if Democrats one day decide to say that climate change is a national emergency (they already have) but have the power to use executive action? Must be very, very careful here.”


    What if, Dana?

    Answer your own question, if your tongue isn’t paralyzed by your own fear of… something?

    That’s what you NeverTrump traitors and RINOs always do… i.e., NOTHING, for fear that the devilrats might do the same when they get the chance. Either that, or you’re just full out traitors and controlled opposition, working for the other side.

    HELLO, idiot!

    The devilrats will ALWAYS do brick-on-the-accelerator toward the cliff, NO MATTER WHAT you spineless, limp-wristed, Lilly-livered, corrupt, bribed, treasonous &^%@stards to OR don’t do.

    You continually handicap yourselves in hopes that the devilrats (who never EVER handicap themselves) will follow your pathetic, weakling example.

    It’s people just like YOU, Dana, that are the reason we always LOSE, constantly. You’re afraid of your own shadow, and you’re afraid of taking ANY controversial action (which means ANY action AT ALL) because “what if the Democrats do the same thing next time they’re in power?!?”.

    Here’s a newsflash, Lush: The devilrats would rip the beating heart out of your chest and feed it to a pig while you watched, if it advanced their agenda.

    They’re not getting any ideas from us, they’re 1,000% all-in for the anything goes approach. In case you haven’t noticed, they’ve been involved in an ongoing coup since the DAY President Trump won the election.

    You’re so worried about what the democrats MIGHT do, yet you don’t even notice what they’re actually doing, RIGHT NOW.

    Liked by 3 people

  13. There is a silver lining in this despicable bill.
    Congress has totally exposed themselves who they are what their values are and who the black hats are.

    No disputing now that McConnell is a black hat and he is owned and serves a master that is contrary to the best interest of the US and its people. McConnell telling POTUS there is no poison pill in the bill is a fat lie. He is not a good reflection on KY.

    The other Republicans got willingly snowed and gave away pork willy nilly without having the Presidents back. They are weak weasels and they need to be ousted. Do we have the names of these traitors…?
    What Congress is telling us US Citizens that flooding the country with illegals, drugs, ms13 gangs and killing people is ok with them because their blind hate for POTUS is more important than keeping citizens safe and making .

    All the Republicans who betrayed POTUS voting for the bill need to know what we think about them. I hope to God we are already calling and sending emails .

    I am glad in S OH we are already moving and I heard our county is Republican. They are Trump people. The people voted strait Republican as POTUS as us too. The Republicans should kiss POTUS (…) for that..

    We need to turn this Pelosi poison bill to our advantage and help POTUS with lifting and turning this around and support people who are 100% for POTUS agenda and for the US and the US people.
    We have to stop sending traitors to DC.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s