One of the greatest things I ever learned from Sundance over at The Last Refuge is this:
the timelines always get them
I will keep this simple, so the “aha” is easy to see.
This is my prior article on the conspiracy against Brett Kavanaugh:
Here is a link to said prior post on the conspiracy against Brett Kavanaugh. You can come back to it – it’s not needed to understand the following, although it helps fill in details.
Now, here is an article about the obscure (in my opinion) Mark Judge book that uses a very interestingly “barely camouflaged” version of Brett Kavanaugh’s name as somebody likely to be assumed to be Dr. Ford’s assailant. The name was changed to “Bart O’Cavanaugh”, if I remember the spelling correctly. C or K.
Note that this is not normally an expensive book – but it’s hard to get now, and hence the inflated price.
I will confess making a joke that this “rare book” was “worth something for a reason”.
The book is listed here as being published in 2005.
2005, you say? Yes! 2005!
Question! Where does that fit on the Brett Kavanaugh career TIMELINE?
Glad you asked!
Here is a convenient Wall Street Journal article about – well – just look!
Allow me to call attention to this part of it:
At this point, if you haven’t, you can go back to that link above to my prior post.
And now, to spell it all out, here is a comment I did on this on The Treehouse.
This was in response to Cari Kelemen (ParteaGirl) saying that she thought this claim was political from the very beginning.
I have been reminded by fellow Treepers that Dr. Ford is at legal risk if she either testifies OR if the letter is entered as evidence. Aren’t these things making sense now? Doesn’t CHI-FI / SPY-FI and her rather unorthodox way of “whoops” accidentally making this known, which was “kinds sorta not legally binding”, make sense now?
Indeed, isn’t everything making sense now?